The phosphoinositide 3 kinase (PI3K)-protein kinase B (PKB/AKT)-mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) axis is a key signal transduction system that links oncogenes and multiple receptor classes which are involved in many essential cellular functions. Aberrant PI3K signalling is one of the most commonly mutated pathways in cancer. Consequently, more than 40 compounds targeting key components of this signalling network have been tested in clinical trials among various types of cancer. As the oncogenic activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway often occurs alongside mutations in other signalling networks, combination therapy should be considered. In this review, we highlight recent advances in the knowledge of the PI3K pathway and discuss the current state and future challenges of targeting this pathway in clinical practice.
Identifying novel circulating biomarkers predictive of response and informative about the mechanisms of resistance, is the new challenge for breast cancer (BC) management. The integration of omics information will gradually revolutionize the clinical approach. Liquid biopsy is being incorporated into the diagnostic and decision-making process for the treatment of BC, in particular with the analysis of circulating tumor DNA, although with some relevant limitations, including costs. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentomics and its integrity index may become a cheaper, noninvasive biomarker that could provide significant additional information for monitoring response to systemic treatments in BC. The purpose of our review is to focus on the available research on cfDNA integrity and its features as a biomarker of diagnosis, prognosis and response to treatments in BC, highlighting new perspectives and critical issues for future applications.
Approximately 6% of metastatic breast cancers arise de novo. While systemic therapy (ST) remains the treatment backbone as for patients with metachronous metastases, locoregional treatment (LRT) of the primary tumor remains a controversial method. The removal of the primary has an established role for palliative purposes, but it is unclear if it could also determine a survival benefit. Retrospective evidence and pre-clinical studies seem to support the removal of the primary as an effective approach to improve survival. On the other hand, most randomized evidence suggests avoiding LRT. Both retrospective and prospective studies suffer several limitations, ranging from selection bias and outdated ST to a small sample of patients. In this review we discuss available data and try to identify subgroups of patients which could benefit the most from LRT of the primary, to facilitate clinical practice decisions, and to hypothesize future studies design on this topic.
Background: Patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) generally receive hormonal therapy (HT) combined with CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). Despite this treatment, resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6i emerge and the majority of these patients experience disease progression (PD). This highlight the necessity to uncover the resistance mechanism to CDK4/6i through the identification of specific biomarkers. The primary objective is to assess the accuracy and feasibility of a novel multi-gene target panel NGS assay on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to detect molecular alterations of AKT1, ERBB2, ESR1, KRAS, PIK3CA, and TP53 genes in women with BC undergoing HT plus CDK4/6i treatment. Secondarily, the study aims to explore the relationship between genomic profiling and clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: Plasma samples were collected from 16 patients diagnosed with advanced/locally advanced HR+/HER2- BC at 2 time points: T0 (baseline) and at T1 (3 months after CDK4/6i treatment). Starting from 2 mL of plasma, ctDNA was isolated and libraries were set up using the Plasma-SeqSensei (PQS)® Breast Cancer IVD Kit, sequenced on Nextseq 550 and analyzed using the Plasma-SeqSensei™ IVD Software®. Results: Among the five patients who presented PD, three had PIK3CA mutations and, of these, two showed a higher mutant allele frequency (MAF) at T1. In three patients with stable disease and in eight patients with partial response, the MAF of the detected alterations decreased dramatically or disappeared during CDK4/6i treatment. Conclusions: Based on our findings, the liquid biopsy analysis using the PQS panel seems to be both feasible and accurate, demonstrating a strong sensitivity in detecting mutations. This exploratory analysis of the clinical outcome associated to the mutational status of patients highlights the potential of molecular analysis on liquid biopsy for disease monitoring, although further validation with a larger patient cohort is necessary to confirm these preliminary observations.
The research on non-invasive circulating biomarkers to guide clinical decision is in wide expansion, including the earliest disease settings. Several new intensification/de-intensification strategies are approaching clinical practice, personalizing the treatment for each patient. Moreover, liquid biopsy is revealing its potential with multiple techniques and studies available on circulating biomarkers in the preoperative phase. Inflammatory circulating cells, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and other biological biomarkers are improving the armamentarium for treatment selection. Defining the escalation and de-escalation of treatments is a mainstay of personalized medicine in early breast cancer. In this review, we delineate the studies investigating the possible application of these non-invasive tools to give a more enlightened approach to escalating/de-escalating strategies in early breast cancer.
Background/Objectives: Pharmacological prevention is an evidence-based strategy to reduce the incidence of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in high-risk women. Despite strong data from randomized trials, clinical uptake remains low. This review aims to summarize the efficacy, safety, and clinical implementation of pharmacoprevention and explore novel approaches to improve uptake. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted on pharmacologic agents used for breast cancer risk reduction, including selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs). The review also examines risk assessment models, guideline recommendations, barriers to implementation, and emerging strategies such as low-dose therapies and digital decision aids. Results: Tamoxifen, raloxifene, and AIs significantly reduce the incidence of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in high-risk populations. However, adverse effects and poor awareness limit their use. Personalized risk models and newer approaches, including low-dose tamoxifen, digital health tools, and emerging agents such as SERDs and GLP-1 receptor agonists, may improve acceptability and adherence. Conclusions: Pharmacoprevention offers substantial benefits in appropriately selected women. Future efforts should focus on new drugs, precision risk stratification, individualized decision-making, and overcoming barriers to implementation to maximize the impact of preventive strategies in breast cancer control.