Aims: Recent studies indicate that brain natriuretic peptide (BNP1–32) may be truncated into BNP3–32 by dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP4) and that BNP3–32 has reduced biological activities compared with BNP1–32. We investigated if DPP4 contributes to the cardiorenal alterations and to the attenuated response to BNP seen in heart failure. Methods and results: Haemodynamic and renal assessment was performed in 12 pigs at baseline, 4 weeks after pacing-induced heart failure, and during BNP infusion. They were randomized to either placebo or treatment with a DPP4 inhibitor, sitagliptin. After 4 weeks of pacing, heart rate was reduced compared with baseline in the sitagliptin group (60 ± 2 vs. 95 ± 16 b.p.m., P < 0.01), and an increase in stroke volume was observed in the sitagliptin group compared with placebo (+24 ± 6% vs. –17 ± 7%, P < 0.01). Glomerular filtration rate declined at week 4 compared with baseline in the placebo group (1.3 ± 0.4 vs. 2.3 ± 0.3 mL/kg/min, P < 0.01) but remained preserved in the sitagliptin group [1.8 ± 0.2 vs. 2.0 ± 0.3 mL/kg/min, P = NS (non-significant)]. In the sitagliptin group, BNP infusion improved end-systolic elastance (68 ± 5 vs. 31 ± 4 mmHg/kg/mL, P < 0.05), ventricular–arterial coupling, and mechanical efficiency. Compared with controls (n = 6), myocardial gene expression of BNP, interleukin-6, Na+–Ca2+ exchanger, and calmodulin was up-regulated in the placebo group, but not in the sitagliptin group. Conclusion: In pacing-induced heart failure, DPP4 inhibition preserves the glomerular filtration rate, modulates stroke volume and heart rate, and potentiates the positive inotropic effect of exogenous BNP at no energy expense.

Background. Current or recent use of abacavir for treating human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection has been associated with increased rates of myocardial infarction (MI). Given the role of platelet aggregation in thrombus formation in MI and the reversible nature of the abacavir association, we hypothesized that patients treated with abacavir would have increased platelet reactivity. Methods. In a prospective study in adult HIV-infected patients, we determined associations between antiretrovirals (ARVs), and in particular the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor abacavir, and platelet reactivity by measuring time-dependent platelet aggregation in response to agonists: adenosine diphosphate (ADP), thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP), collagen, and epinephrine. Results. Of 120 subjects, 40 were ARV-naive and 80 ARV-treated, 40 of whom were receiving abacavir. No consistent differences in platelet reactivity were observed between the ARV-naive and ARV-treated groups. In contrast, within the ARV-treated group, abacavir-treated subjects had consistently higher percentages of platelet aggregation upon exposure to ADP, collagen, and epinephrine (P = .037, P = .022, and P = .032, respectively) and had platelets that were more sensitive to aggregation upon exposure to TRAP (P = .025). Conclusions. The consistent increases in platelet reactivity observed in response to a range of agonists provides a plausible underlying mechanism to explain the reversible increased rates of MI observed in abacavir-treated patients.

Background—: Small coronary vessels supply small myocardial territories. The clinical significance of small-vessel stenoses is therefore questionable. Moreover, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of nonfunctionally significant lesions does not improve clinical outcome and might be associated with potential procedural or stent related risks. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided PCI in the treatment of small coronary vessel lesions as compared with an angio-guided PCI. Methods and Results—: From January 2004 to December 2008, all patients treated with PCI for stable or unstable angina in small native coronary vessels (reference vessel diameter and stent size <3 mm) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into angio-guided and an FFR-guided PCI groups. A total of 717 patients were enrolled (495 angio-guided, 222 FFR-guided). End points were death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), combined death or nonfatal MI, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and procedure costs. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as death, nonfatal MI, and TVR. Clinical follow-up was obtained in 97.5% (median follow-up: 3.3 [from 0.01–5] years) of the patients. Seventy-eight patients (35%) had a significant FFR (<0.80) and underwent PCI. Using a propensity score adjusted Cox analysis, patients treated with FFR-guided PCI had significantly lower combined death or nonfatal MI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.413; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.227–0.750; P =0.004), nonfatal MI (HR, 0.063; 95% CI, 0.009–0.462; P =0.007), TVR (HR, 0.517; 95% CI, 0.323–0.826; P =0.006), and MACE (HR, 0.458; 95% CI, 0.310–0.679; P <0.001). No difference was observed in mortality alone (HR, 0.684; 95% CI, 0.355–1.316; P =0.255). Procedure costs were also reduced in the FFR guided strategy (3253±102 Euros versus 4714±37 Euros, P <0.0001). Conclusions—: FFR-guided PCI of small coronary arteries is safe and results in better clinical outcomes when compared with an angio-guided PCI.

Vitamin D and cholesterol metabolism overlap significantly in the pathways that contribute to their biosynthesis. However, our understanding of their independent and co-regulation is limited. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death globally and atherosclerosis, the pathology associated with elevated cholesterol, is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease. It is therefore important to understand vitamin D metabolism as a contributory factor. From the literature, we compile evidence of how these systems interact, relating the understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved to the results from observational studies. We also present the first systems biology pathway map of the joint cholesterol and vitamin D metabolisms made available using the Systems Biology Graphical Notation (SBGN) Markup Language (SBGNML). It is shown that the relationship between vitamin D supplementation, total cholesterol, and LDL-C status, and between latitude, vitamin D, and cholesterol status are consistent with our knowledge of molecular mechanisms. We also highlight the results that cannot be explained with our current knowledge of molecular mechanisms: (i) vitamin D supplementation mitigates the side-effects of statin therapy; (ii) statin therapy does not impact upon vitamin D status; and critically (iii) vitamin D supplementation does not improve cardiovascular outcomes, despite improving cardiovascular risk factors. For (iii), we present a hypothesis, based on observations in the literature, that describes how vitamin D regulates the balance between cellular and plasma cholesterol. Answering these questions will create significant opportunities for advancement in our understanding of cardiovascular health.