The Oncomine™ Dx Target Test based on next-generation sequencing has been approved for the screening of oncogenic mutations in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients. We assessed the tissue sample factors that affect the success rate of Oncomine™ Dx Target Test companion diagnostics and the feasibility of using biopsy specimens for Oncomine™ Dx Target Test companion diagnostics in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Ninety-nine biopsy samples were subjected to genetic testing using the Oncomine™ Dx Target Test companion diagnostics to detect v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homologue B1 mutations (Cohort 1), and 136 biopsy samples were examined using Oncomine™ Dx Target Test companion diagnostics for the detection of multiple oncogenic mutations (Cohort 2) between July 2018 and April 2020. We retrospectively collected clinical and pathological data, including tissue size and tumour cell content. The success rate was 77% (76/99) in Cohort 1 and 93% (127/136) in Cohort 2. In Cohort 1, the success rate was significantly associated with the tumour cell content: the success rate was 63% for samples with a tumour cell content of <20%, whereas it was 83% for samples with a tumour cell content of 20% or higher (P = 0.0446). The tissue size also affected the success rate: a success rate of 57% was obtained for tissue sizes <4 mm², whereas a success rate of 95% was obtained for tissue sizes of 4 mm² or larger (P < 0.0001). In Cohort 2, the success rate was 100% when tumour specimens with a tissue size of 4 mm² or larger were used. Tissue size and tumour cell content were significantly associated with the success rate of Oncomine™ Dx Target Test companion diagnostics.

The success rate of next-generation sequencing (NGS) with specimens obtained through endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) among patients with lung cancer as well as the related clinical factors remain unclear. We aimed to determine the optimal number of punctures and core tissues during EBUS-TBNA for NGS in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as well as the association of chest computed tomography (CT) and EBUS findings with successful NGS. We retrospectively reviewed 156 consecutive patients with NSCLC who underwent EBUS-TBNA for NGS (Oncomine^TM Dx Target Test). Using the receiver operating characteristic curve, we calculated the optimal numbers of punctures and core tissues for NGS and evaluated CT and EBUS findings suggestive of necrosis and vascular pattern within the lesion. The success rate of NGS was 83.3%. The cut-off value for the number of core tissues was 4, and the sensitivity and specificity of successful NGS were 73.8% and 61.5%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the number of core tissues (≥4) was the sole predictor of successful NGS. CT and EBUS findings were not associated with successful NGS. Bronchoscopists should obtain sufficient core tissues for successful NGS using EBUS-TBNA specimens.

Osimertinib (OSI), a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the standard treatment for patients with naive EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Nevertheless, information on how the mutation subtype affects disease progression after the failure of OSI treatment is scarce. We retrospectively reviewed patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received OSI as a first-line treatment between April 2015 and December 2021. This study included 229 patients. The objective response rate was 71%, with intracranial and extracranial response rates of 71% and 90%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 23.3 mo (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.6–26.7), and the median overall survival was 33.7 mo (95% CI: 31.3–58.6). Multivariate analysis revealed that the EGFR exon 21 L858R point mutation (L858R) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.04–2.34, p = 0.0328) and liver metastasis (HR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.53–4.49, p = 0.0004) were significant predictors of progression-free survival in OSI treatment. The concomitant disease progression involving the central nervous system metastasis was significantly more common in patients with L858R (p = 0.048), whereas concomitant disease progression involving primary lesions was significantly more common in patients with exon 19 deletion mutation (p = 0.01). In addition, the probability of disease progression over time was higher for L858R compared with that for exon 19 deletion mutation, in patients with central nervous system metastasis (log-rank test, p = 0.027). The mutation subtype had an impact not only on the clinical outcome of the first-line OSI treatment but also on progression patterns after OSI treatment in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.

Lorlatinib (LOR) or pemetrexed-based chemotherapy (PEM) is the standard treatment after failure of a second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, such as alectinib, in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. Nevertheless, there have been few data on the clinical outcomes of these treatments after alectinib failure. We retrospectively analyzed patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC who received LOR (LOR group) or PEM (PEM group) as post-treatment after alectinib failure between December 2012 and August 2020. Among 90 patients who experienced disease progression during alectinib treatment, 38 of them received either PEM (n = 22) or LOR (n = 16) as subsequent treatment. The objective response rate and the median progression-free survival were similar in the PEM and LOR groups (objective response rate: 45% versus 44%, p = 0.92; median progression-free survival: 6.9 mo versus 6.2 mo, p = 0.83, respectively). Disease progression during treatment occurred in 22 patients with PEM and 14 patients with LOR. The central nervous system (CNS) was the most common site of progression in both groups. In patients without CNS metastasis at baseline, the cumulative incidence rate of CNS progression was lower over time in the LOR group compared with the PEM group (p = 0.045), whereas in patients with CNS metastasis at baseline, there were no significant differences in cumulative incidence rate of CNS progression between both groups (p = 0.43). Clinical outcomes of PEM and LOR after failure of alectinib were similar in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.

Introduction: Extensive small cell lung cancer (ES‐SCLC) are currently managed using first‐line chemotherapy options, including atezolizumab (Atezo) plus etoposide and carboplatin (CE) or durvalumab (Durva) plus etoposide with either cisplatin (PE) or carboplatin (CE). However, a definitive distinction in therapeutic effects between Atezo and Durva in these regimens remains unestablished.Methods: We analyzed data from 100 patients diagnosed with ES‐SCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as first‐line chemotherapy. Among them, 70 were administered Atezo + CE, 12 received Durva + PE, and 18 received Durva + CE. We assessed the efficacy of the two ICIs across various factors.Results: The progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) did not significantly differ between Atezo + CE and Durva + CE/PE as first‐line chemotherapy treatments for SCLC. We observed no significant differences in age, sex, performance status (PS), liver metastasis, bone metastasis, or platinum‐based agent usage between the treatment cohorts. However, a marked improvement in PFS and OS was observed in the solitary patient with brain metastasis treated with Atezo + CE.Conclusion: The primary distinction between these treatments was observed in the management of patients with brain metastasis. The literature lacks comparative studies on the effects of first‐line ICI treatment on the central nervous system, rendering our findings significant in clinical practice. Despite the retrospective nature of this study and the potential for various biases, we recommend the preferential use of Atezo + CE in patients with brain metastasis to potentially enhance prognosis.