Patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) face a multifaceted disease burden which includes impaired health-related quality of life (HRQL) and potential stigmatization. We aimed to assess the burden of liver disease in patients with NAFLD and the relationship between experience of stigma and HRQL. Members of the Global NASH Council created a survey about disease burden in NAFLD. Participants completed a 35-item questionnaire to assess liver disease burden (LDB) (seven domains), the 36-item CLDQ-NASH (six domains) survey to assess HRQL and reported their experience with stigmatization and discrimination. A total of 2,117 patients with NAFLD from 24 countries completed the LDB survey (48% Middle East and North Africa, 18% Europe, 16% USA, 18% Asia) and 778 competed CLDQ-NASH. Of the study group, 9% reported stigma due to NAFLD and 26% due to obesity. Participants who reported stigmatization due to NAFLD had substantially lower CLDQ-NASH scores (all p <0.0001). In multivariate analyses, experience with stigmatization or discrimination due to NAFLD was the strongest independent predictor of lower HRQL scores (beta from -5% to -8% of score range size, p <0.02). Experience with stigmatization due to obesity was associated with lower Activity, Emotional Health, Fatigue, and Worry domain scores, and being uncomfortable with the term "fatty liver disease" with lower Emotional Health scores (all p <0.05). In addition to stigma, the greatest disease burden as assessed by LDB was related to patients' self-blame for their liver disease. Stigmatization of patients with NAFLD, whether it is caused by obesity or NAFLD, is strongly and independently associated with a substantial impairment of their HRQL. Self-blame is an important part of disease burden among patients with NAFLD. Patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), recently renamed metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), may experience impaired health-related quality of life and stigmatization. Using a specifically designed survey, we found that stigmatization of patients with NAFLD, whether it is caused by obesity or the liver disease per se, is strongly and independently associated with a substantial impairment of their quality of life. Physicians treating patients with NAFLD should be aware of the profound implications of stigma, the high prevalence of self-blame in the context of this disease burden, and that providers' perception may not adequately reflect patients' perspective and experience with the disease.

Background/Objectives: The Elecsys^® HCV Duo immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics International Ltd., Rotkreuz, Switzerland) detects both antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) and HCV core antigen (HCV-Ag) and has shown excellent diagnostic performance in blood donor samples. We aim to validate its use for diagnosing chronic HCV infection and assessing sustained virological response (SVR) post-direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in patients with or without HIV infection. Methods: Blood samples from 100 healthy controls, as well as 64 HCV mono-infection and 136 HCV-HIV coinfections, were collected before and 12–24 weeks after DAAs. The assay performance for determining active infection at baseline and SVR was compared with HCV RNA. Results: Overall, 156 (78.0%) of HCV-infected patients had HCV genotype 1, and the SVR rate was 96.5%. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUROC) for HCV diagnosis at baseline were 99.50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.82–99.97%), 100% (95%CI, 95.39–100%), and 0.998 (95%CI, 0.992–1.003), respectively. The corresponding results for HCV-Ag in determining SVR were 57.14% (95%CI, 20.24–88.19%), 97.41% (95%CI, 93.73–99.04%), and 0.773 (95%CI, 0.543–1.003), respectively. The assay also exhibited comparable sensitivity and specificity between HCV mono- and coinfection. Conclusions: Our study showed that the Elecsys^® HCV Duo immunoassay effectively diagnosed HCV infection, regardless of HIV status, making it suitable for managing high-risk populations in resource-limited settings.

INTRODUCTION: Data on the relationship between bacterial translocation, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), and mortality are scarce. This study aimed to assess the association between bacterial DNA (bactDNA) translocation, inflammatory response, ammonia levels, and severity of HE in patients with cirrhosis, as well as the role of bactDNA translocation in predicting mortality. METHODS: Cirrhotic patients without bacterial infection were prospectively enrolled between June 2022 and January 2023. Grading of HE was classified by the West Haven Criteria and Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score ≤ −5. RESULTS: Overall, 294 cirrhotic patients were enrolled, with 92 (31.3%) and 58 (19.7%) having covert and overt HE, respectively. BactDNA translocation was detected in 36.1% of patients (n = 106). Patients with overt HE had more bactDNA translocation and higher serum lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and ammonia levels than those without HE. Patients with detectable bactDNA had higher white cell counts and serum LBP and IL-6 levels than those without. By contrast, bactDNA, serum LBP, and soluble CD14 levels were comparable between patients with covert HE and those without HE. The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that bactDNA translocation (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22–5.11), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.09–1.16), age (HR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.000–1.002), and baseline IL-6 (HR = 1.001, 95% CI: 1.000–1.002) were independent factors associated with 6-month mortality. DISCUSSION: Apart from hyperammonemia, bactDNA translocation is a possible factor associated with overt HE in cirrhotic patients. BactDNA translocation and IL-6 are independent factors associated with 6-month mortality.

Background: Variceal bleeding is associated with poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Therefore, it is essential to identify indicators of high-risk varices (HRV) and provide prompt intervention. Aim: To validate and modify albumin-bilirubin and platelet scores to predict high-risk varices in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: We enrolled patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and esophagogastroduodenoscopy reports at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, between 2015 and 2022. The nearest demographic and clinical characteristics and laboratory values were reviewed retrospectively within 6 months before the esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Albumin-bilirubin and platelet counts were calculated from the albumin-bilirubin grade plus score from platelet count. We evaluated the new modified albumin-bilirubin and platelet (mALBI-PLT)‘s in predicting HRV by dividing participants into a training cohort (first half) and a validation cohort (second half). Results: Of 564 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, 277 were included. Most patients (232 [83.8%]) had Child-Turcotte-Pugh A cirrhosis, whereas 131 (47.3%), 85 (30.7%), and 60 (22.0%) had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages A, B, and C, respectively. Thirty-eight (15.6%) participants had HRV on esophagogastroduodenoscopy. On multivariate analysis, modified albumin-bilirubin grades 2b and 3 and platelet count ≤150,000/µL were significantly associated with HRV. With a cut-off value of 2, the mALBI-PLT showed comparable performance in both cohorts, yielding sensitivities of 93.8% and 95.5%, and negative predictive values (NPV) of 98.1% and 98.0%, respectively. In the entire cohort, the albumin-bilirubin and platelet scores, and mALBI-PLT score >2, demonstrated excellent sensitivities (97.4% and 94.7%), respectively, (with NPV of 98.7% and 98.0%), in predicting HRV. Conclusion: Modified albumin-bilirubin grade and platelet at cut-off 150,000/µL exhibited significant association with high-risk varices in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Moreover, hepatocellular carcinoma patients with modified albumin-bilirubin grade 1 or 2a, together with platelets > 150,000/µL, may be able to avoid oesophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Background: Serum mac-2-binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) is a new biomarker for liver fibrosis. However, its performance in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), particularly in obese patients, remains to be explored. Methods: This study evaluated the role of M2BPGi in predicting liver fibrosis in 205 patients with MASLD using magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) as a reference. The performance of M2BPGi was compared to vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), FIB-4, APRI, and NFS. The PNPLA3, TM6SF2, and HSD17B13 polymorphisms were assessed by allelic discrimination assays. Results: The area under the ROC curves for VCTE, M2BPGi FIB-4, APRI, and NFS in differentiating significant fibrosis were 0.95 (95% CI; 0.91–0.98), 0.85 (0.79–0.92), 0.81 (0.74–0.89), 0.79 (0.71–0.87), and 0.80 (0.72–0.87) (all p < 0.001), respectively. The optimal cut-off values of M2BPGi in predicting significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 0.82, 0.95, and 1.23 cut-off index (COI); yielding satisfactory sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy. The performance of M2BPGi was consistent among subgroups according to BMI, while the AUROCs of FIB-4, APRI, and NFS were remarkably decreased in patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m². Patients with the PNPLA3 GG genotype had significantly higher M2BPGi than those with the CC/CG genotypes. In multivariate analysis, the independent factors associated with significant liver fibrosis were VCTE, M2BPGi, and PNPLA3 rs738409. Conclusions: Our data demonstrated that serum M2BPGi accurately assessed liver fibrosis across different BMI, indicating that this biomarker could apply to non-obese and obese patients with MASLD in clinical settings.

Background: Heterologous prime-boost vaccination potentially augments the immune response against SARS-CoV-2 in liver transplant (LT) recipients. We investigated immunogenicity induced by different primary prime-boost vaccination protocols and the subsequent response to the booster vaccine among LT recipients. Methods: LT recipients, who received primary immunisation with ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1 or ChAdOx1/BNT162b2, were administered the third dose of mRNA-1273 three months following the primary vaccination. Blood samples were collected before and after primary vaccination and post-booster. The levels of receptor binding domain antibody (anti-RBD) and neutralising antibody (sVNT) and spike-specific T-cell responses were assessed. Results: Among the 89 LT recipients, patients receiving ChAdOx1/BNT162b2 had significantly higher anti-RBD titres, sVNT, and cellular response after primary vaccination than those receiving ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1 (p < 0.05). The antibody response decreased 12 weeks after the primary vaccination. After the booster, humoral and cellular responses significantly improved, with comparable seroconversion rates between the heterologous and homologous groups. Positive sVNT against the wild type occurred in >90% of LT patients, with only 12.3% positive against the Omicron variant. Conclusions: ChAdOx1/BNT162b2 evoked a significantly higher immunological response than ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1 in LT recipients. The booster strategy substantially induced robust immunity against wild type in most patients but was less effective against the Omicron strain.