Kalaiarasan Ellappan

Dr. Kalaiarasan Ellappan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2017 in Microbial Pathogenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KEKalaiarasan Ellappan
Kalaiarasan Ellappan
KTKottha Thirumalaswamy
Kottha Thirumalaswamy
BHBelgode Narasimha Harish
Belgode Narasimha Harish
VGVasuki Gnanasambandam
Vasuki Gnanasambandam
VSVeeresh Kumar Sali
Veeresh Kumar Sali
JJJames John
James John

1 March 2018 in Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KEKalaiarasan Ellappan
Kalaiarasan Ellappan
HNHarish Belgode Narasimha
Harish Belgode Narasimha
SKSaravana Kumar
Saravana Kumar

12 October 2011 in Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Tharmarajan RamprasathTharmarajan Ramprasath
Tharmarajan Ramprasath
PMPonniah Senthil Murugan
Ponniah Senthil Murugan
KEKalaiarasan Ellappan
Kalaiarasan Ellappan
PGPannerselvam Gomathi
Pannerselvam Gomathi
ARAndiappan Rathinavel
Andiappan Rathinavel
GSGovindan Sadasivam Selvam
Govindan Sadasivam Selvam

1 March 2014 in Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KEKalaiarasan Ellappan
Kalaiarasan Ellappan
TPThayumanavan Palvannan
Thayumanavan Palvannan

1 October 2017 in Journal of Laboratory Physicians
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRManohar Shoorashetty Rudresh
Manohar Shoorashetty Rudresh
GRGiriyapur Siddappa Ravi
Giriyapur Siddappa Ravi
LSLakshminarayanappa Sunitha
Lakshminarayanappa Sunitha
SHSadiya Noor Hajira
Sadiya Noor Hajira
KEKalaiarasan Ellappan
Kalaiarasan Ellappan
BHBelgode Narasimha Harish
Belgode Narasimha Harish
PURPOSE: Detection of carbapenemases among Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) is important for both clinicians and infection control practitioners. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommends Carba NP (CNP) as confirmatory test for carbapenemase production. The reagents required for CNP test are costly and hence the test cannot be performed on a routine basis. The present study evaluates modifications of CNP test for rapid detection of carbapenemases among GNB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The GNB were screened for carbapenemase production using CNP, CarbAcineto NP (CANP), and modified CNP (mCNP) test. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed on all the carbapenem-resistant bacteria for carbapenemase genes. The results of three phenotypic tests were compared with PCR. RESULTS: A total of 765 gram negative bacteria were screened for carbapenem resistance. Carbapenem resistance was found in 144 GNB. The metallo-β-lactamases were most common carbapenemases followed by OXA-48-like enzymes. The CANP test was most sensitive (80.6%) for carbapenemases detection. The mCNP test was 62.1% sensitive for detection of carbapenemases. The mCNP, CNP, and CANP tests were equally sensitive (95%) for detection of NDM enzymes among Enterobacteriaceae. The mCNP test had poor sensitivity for detection of OXA-48-like enzymes. CONCLUSION: The mCNP test was rapid, cost-effective, and easily adoptable on routine basis. The early detection of carbapenemases using mCNP test will help in preventing the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms in the hospital settings.

1 December 2020 in Tuberculosis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KEKalaiarasan Ellappan
Kalaiarasan Ellappan
KTKalpana Thangavelu
Kalpana Thangavelu
KKKrishnakumariamma Krishnapriya
Krishnakumariamma Krishnapriya
MMMuthaiah Muthuraj
Muthaiah Muthuraj
MJMaria Jose
Maria Jose
NJNoyal Mariya Joseph
Noyal Mariya Joseph