Cristobal Jesus Morales Portillo

Dr. Cristobal Jesus Morales Portillo


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2017 in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDParesh Dandona
Paresh Dandona
CMChantal Mathieu
Chantal Mathieu
MPMoshe Phillip
Moshe Phillip
LHLars Hansen
Lars Hansen
SGSteven C Griffen
Steven C Griffen
WBWilliam Biggs
William Biggs

13 February 2019 in Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAthena Philis‐Tsimikas
Athena Philis‐Tsimikas
LBLiana K. Billings
Liana K. Billings
RBRobert Busch
Robert Busch
Cristobal Jesus Morales PortilloCristobal Jesus Morales Portillo
Cristobal Jesus Morales Portillo
RSRakesh Sahay
Rakesh Sahay
SHStewart Harris
Stewart Harris
Aim: To investigate the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) versus insulin glargine 100 units/mL (IGlar U100) as add‐on to sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitor therapy. Materials and methods: In this 26‐week, phase IIIb, open‐label, parallel‐group, treat‐to‐target trial, conducted at 74 sites in 11 countries, insulin‐naïve people aged ≥18 years with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 53–97 mmol/mol (7.0–11.0%), body mass index 20–40 kg/m 2 and inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) on SGLT2 inhibitor ± oral antidiabetic drugs were randomized 1:1 to once‐daily IDegLira or IGlar U100, both as add‐on to existing therapy. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26. Results: A total of 210 participants were randomized to each treatment arm. Mean HbA1c reductions were 21 mmol/mol (1.9%‐points) with IDegLira and 18 mmol/mol (1.7%‐points) with IGlar U100; confirming non‐inferiority ( P < 0.0001) and superiority of IDegLira (difference in HbA1c change –3.90 mmol/mol; 95% confidence interval [CI] –5.45; –2.35 (−0.36%‐points; 95% CI –0.50, –0.21)). Superiority for IDegLira over IGlar U100 was also confirmed for: body weight (difference −1.92 kg; 95% CI –2.64, –1.19); severe or blood‐glucose‐confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia (rate ratio 0.42; 95% CI 0.23, 0.75); total daily insulin dose (difference −15.37 U; 95% CI –19.60, −11.13). The overall treatment‐emergent adverse event rate was higher with IDegLira as a result of higher increased lipase and nausea rates. Conclusions: The favourable safety and efficacy profile of IDegLira in people with uncontrolled T2D on SGLT2 inhibitors, and lower weight gain and hypoglycaemia risk versus IGlar U100, suggest that clinicians should consider IDegLira initiation in this population.

18 July 2017 in Diabetes Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FGFernando Gomez-Peralta
Fernando Gomez-Peralta
CACristina Abreu
Cristina Abreu
Albert LecubeAlbert Lecube
Albert Lecube
DIEGO BELLIDO GUERRERODIEGO BELLIDO GUERRERO
DIEGO BELLIDO GUERRERO
ASAlfonso Soto
Alfonso Soto
GUGuillermo Umpierrez
Guillermo Umpierrez
Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are an attractive novel therapeutic option for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. They block the reabsorption of filtered glucose in kidneys, mainly in proximal renal tubules, resulting in increased urinary glucose excretion and correction of the diabetes-related hyperglycemia. Beyond improving glucose control, SGLT2 inhibitors offer potential benefits by reducing body weight and blood pressure. On the basis of the efficacy demonstrated in clinical trials, SGLT2 inhibitors are recommended as second- or third-line agents for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes. Beneficial effects on kidney disease progression, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, and hospitalization for heart failure have also been demonstrated with one SGLT2 inhibitor (empagliflozin). Potential adverse events resulting from their mechanism of action or related to concomitant therapies are reviewed. A treatment algorithm for the adjustment of concomitant therapies after initiating SGLT2 inhibitors is also proposed.

12 August 2019 in Diabetes Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JRJulio Rosenstock
Julio Rosenstock
CSChristopher H. Sorli
Christopher H. Sorli
MTMichael E. Trautmann
Michael E. Trautmann
Cristobal Jesus Morales PortilloCristobal Jesus Morales Portillo
Cristobal Jesus Morales Portillo
UWUlrich Wendisch
Ulrich Wendisch
KYKun-Ho Yoon
Kun-Ho Yoon
OBJECTIVE To explore the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-weekly efpeglenatide, a long-acting glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), in early type 2 diabetes (T2D) (drug naive or on metformin monotherapy). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS EXCEED 203 was a 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-ranging study of efpeglenatide once weekly referenced to open-label liraglutide 1.8 mg (exploratory analysis). Participants, ∼90% on metformin monotherapy, were randomized to one of five efpeglenatide doses (0.3, 1, 2, 3, or 4 mg q.w.; n = 181), placebo (n = 37), or liraglutide (≤1.8 mg daily; n = 36). The primary efficacy end point was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 13. RESULTS From a baseline HbA1c of 7.7–8.0% (61.0–63.9 mmol/mol), all efpeglenatide doses ≥1 mg significantly reduced HbA1c versus placebo (placebo-adjusted least squares [LS] mean changes 0.6–1.2%, P < 0.05 for all) to a final HbA1c of 6.3–6.8% (45.4–50.6 mmol/mol); masked efpeglenatide 4 mg was noninferior to open-label liraglutide. Greater proportions treated with efpeglenatide ≥1 mg than placebo achieved HbA1c <7% (61–72% vs. 24%, P < 0.05 for all), and greater reductions in body weight were observed with efpeglenatide 3 and 4 mg versus placebo (placebo-adjusted LS mean differences −1.4 and −2.0 kg, respectively, P < 0.05 for both). Rates of nausea and vomiting were consistent with other GLP-1 RAs and rapidly subsided after the initial 2 weeks. No neutralizing antibodies were detected with efpeglenatide. CONCLUSIONS Efpeglenatide once weekly led to significant reductions in HbA1c and weight, with a safety profile consistent with the GLP-1 RA class in patients with early T2D mostly on metformin monotherapy.

1 May 2017 in Endocrinología, Diabetes y Nutrición
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CACarlos Arana
Carlos Arana
AMAna María Moreno-Fernández
Ana María Moreno-Fernández
GGGerardo Gómez-Moreno
Gerardo Gómez-Moreno
Cristobal Jesus Morales PortilloCristobal Jesus Morales Portillo
Cristobal Jesus Morales Portillo
ISIsabel Serrano-Olmedo
Isabel Serrano-Olmedo
THTomás Martín Hernández
Tomás Martín Hernández

12 May 2019 in Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAna Chico
Ana Chico
EAEva Aguilera
Eva Aguilera
F. Javier Ampudia-BlascoF. Javier Ampudia-Blasco
F. Javier Ampudia-Blasco
VBVirgina Bellido
Virgina Bellido
RCRoque Cardona-Hernández
Roque Cardona-Hernández
CGCintia González-Blanco
Cintia González-Blanco
The flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system FreeStyle Libre® is a device that measures interstitial glucose in a very simple way and indicates direction and speed of glucose change. This allows persons with diabetes to prevent hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic events. Scientific evidence indicates that the system can improve glycemic control and quality of life. To obtain the maximum benefit, it is necessary to properly handle glucose values and trends. Due to the generalization of the system use, the purpose of the document is to provide recommendations for the optimal use of the device, not only in the management of glucose values and trends but also in the prevention of hypoglycemia, actuation in exercise, special situations, and retrospective analysis of the glucose data, among others.