Bladder cancer is the ninth most common malignancy worldwide, with two clinically distinct forms: non-muscle-invasive disease, characterized by high recurrence and excellent long-term survival, and muscle-invasive disease, associated with poorer outcomes. Current surveillance-cystoscopy and urine cytology-offers high specificity but is invasive, costly, and insensitive to low-grade tumors, underscoring the need for reliable, non-invasive biomarkers. Liquid biopsy approaches in urine and blood have demonstrated promise for real-time assessment of tumor burden, molecular heterogeneity, and early recurrence. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assays detect tumor-derived genetic and epigenetic alterations, enabling dynamic monitoring of minimal residual disease and treatment response. Methylation-based tests and CpG-targeted sequencing in urine achieve high diagnostic accuracy, potentially reducing dependence on cystoscopy. Molecular classification of bladder tumors into luminal and basal subtypes has refined therapeutic strategies: FGFR inhibitors for luminal-papillary tumors, EGFR-targeted and chemotherapy approaches for basal/squamous cases, and immune-checkpoint inhibitors guided by immune-infiltration profiles. Integration of artificial intelligence with multi-omic liquid biopsy data further enhances predictive modeling for recurrence, treatment response, and minimal residual disease detection. Despite these advances, clinical implementation faces challenges including pre-analytical variability, lack of standardized assays, limited prospective validation, and unclear cost-effectiveness. Harmonized protocols, large multicenter trials, and health-economic evaluations are essential to translate liquid biopsy technologies into routine practice. Future integration with advanced imaging, tissue biopsy, and digital pathology-supported by multidisciplinary collaboration and formal guideline endorsement-holds the potential to personalize bladder cancer management, reduce invasive procedures, and improve patient outcomes.

Male infertility is a prevalent global health issue, with urological disorders representing some of the most common and correctable causes. Key conditions such as varicocele, obstructive azoospermia, erectile dysfunction and Peyronie’s disease impair fertility through distinct pathophysiological mechanisms, including disrupted spermatogenesis, reproductive tract obstruction and failed sperm delivery. The effective management of these conditions hinges on a systematic diagnostic evaluation, which integrates clinical history, physical examination, semen analysis and specialized imaging. Modern management follows a logical progression, beginning with foundational lifestyle modifications, advancing to targeted medical or surgical interventions, and culminating, when necessary, in assisted reproductive technologies. Treatment strategies are therefore highly targeted, ranging from medical management and surgical correction—such as varicocelectomy or microsurgical reconstruction—to sperm retrieval techniques. Furthermore, evidence-based lifestyle modifications and a multidisciplinary clinical approach are fundamental to optimizing reproductive outcomes for affected couples. A comprehensive understanding of these urological etiologies is therefore essential for guiding appropriate intervention and improving the prospects of achieving pregnancy.

Penile cancer, while rare, is a critical public health issue due to its profound impact on patients and the complexities of its management. The disease’s multifactorial etiology includes risk factors such as HPV infection, poor hygiene, smoking, genetic predispositions, and socioeconomic determinants. This article provides a comprehensive review and analysis of these diverse risk factors, aiming to enhance understanding of the disease’s underlying causes. By elucidating these factors, the article seeks to inform and improve prevention strategies, early detection methods, and therapeutic interventions. A nuanced grasp of the multifactorial nature of penile cancer can enable healthcare professionals to develop more effective approaches to reducing incidence rates and improving patient outcomes.

Background: Rezūm therapy, a minimally invasive surgical procedure for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), was very recently developed. Its characteristics and safety profile render its use in patients with multiple comorbidities attractive. In this study, we evaluated the outcomes of Rezūm therapy in patients with frailty, BPH, and an indwelling catheter. Methods: This single-center prospective study involved consecutive patients with frailty who underwent Rezūm therapy from June 2022 to December 2023. Patients with a prostate volume of 30–150 cm ³ , indwelling bladder catheter for ≥6 months, and diagnosis of frailty were included. Frailty was defined as the concomitant presence of a Clinical Frailty Score of ≥4, Charlson Comorbidity Index of ≥3, and Modified Frailty Index of ≥2. The primary end point was successful removal of the catheter and continued catheter independence 12 months after treatment. The International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urinary flow rate, and post-void residual volume were evaluated 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. Results: Seventy patients were included: catheter removal was successful in 66 of these patients (94%), all of whom completed 1 year of follow-up without recatheterization. Statistically significant ( p < 0.05) improvement was observed in the International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urinary flow rate, and post-void residual volume during follow-up. No intraprocedural complications occurred. At 30 days, 4 of the 66 patients (6%) experienced postprocedural complications of Clavien-Dindo grades II ( n = 2) and IIIa ( n = 1). Conclusions: Rezūm therapy was effectively and safely performed in patients with frailty, BPH, and an indwelling catheter. Further large comparative studies are needed.

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common multifactorial condition with significant physical, psychological and relational consequences. While historically associated with aging, its rising prevalence among younger men underscores the need for updated diagnostic and therapeutic frameworks. This narrative review synthesizes contemporary evidence on the pathophysiology, diagnostic workup and management of ED, with emphasis on guideline-directed care and emerging treatment modalities. A comprehensive literature search was conducted, with evidence synthesized from key clinical guidelines, landmark trials and recent peer-reviewed studies. Lifestyle optimization remains the foundational step, followed by first-line pharmacotherapy with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5is), which demonstrate high efficacy and safety across diverse patient populations. For patients with inadequate PDE5is response, second-line options include alprostadil (intracavernosal, with approximately 70% success rates or intraurethral), vacuum erection devices and penile prosthesis surgery, with patient and partner satisfaction exceeding 95% for the latter when performed in experienced centers. Psychosexual therapy is an integral adjunct, particularly in psychogenic or mixed etiologies. Regenerative approaches such as low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-SWT) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections are under investigation; current evidence supports their use only in experimental settings due to limited long-term data. A multidisciplinary, individualized strategy—incorporating pharmacologic, surgical and psychosocial interventions—remains the cornerstone of modern ED management. This review critically distinguishes well-established evidence from ongoing clinical debates and translates findings into practical guidance for daily practice. Ongoing technological advances may further refine diagnostic accuracy and treatment personalization, but high-quality studies are needed to establish the role of regenerative and digital tools.

(1) Background: To identify a particular setting of biopsy-naïve patients in which it would be reasonable to offer only cognitive targeted prostate biopsy (PBx) with a transrectal approach. (2) Methods: We designed an observational retrospective pilot study. Patients with a prostatic specific antigen (PSA) level > 10 ng/mL, either a normal or suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE), and a lesion with a PI-RADS score ≥ 4 in the postero-medial or postero-lateral peripheral zone were included. All patients underwent a transrectal PBx, including both systematic and targeted samples. The detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (Gleason Score ≥ 7) was chosen as the primary outcome. We described the detection rate of csPCa in systematic PBx, targeted PBx, and overall PBx. (3) A total of 92 patients were included. Prostate cancer was detected in 84 patients (91.30%) with combined biopsies. A csPCa was diagnosed in all positive cases (100%) with combined biopsies. Systematic PBxs were positive in 80 patients (86.96%), while targeted PBxs were positive in 84 men (91.30%). Targeted PBx alone would have allowed the diagnosis of csPCa in all positive cases; systematic PBx alone would have missed the diagnosis of 8/84 (9.52%) csPCa cases (4 negative patients and 4 not csPCa) (p = 0.011). (4) Conclusions: Cognitive targeted PBx with a transrectal approach could be offered alone to diagnose csPCa in biopsy-naïve patients with PSA ≥ 10 ng/mL, either normal or suspicious DRE, and a lesion with PI-RADS score ≥ 4 in the postero-medial or postero-lateral peripheral zone.