Genevieve Kozak

Dr. Genevieve Kozak

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2012 in Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVMachteld N. Verzijden
Machteld N. Verzijden
CCCarel Ten Cate
Carel Ten Cate
MSMaria Servedio
Maria Servedio
GKGenevieve Kozak
Genevieve Kozak
JBJenny W. Boughman
Jenny W. Boughman
ESErik I. Svensson
Erik I. Svensson

26 January 2011 in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GKGenevieve Kozak
Genevieve Kozak
MHMegan L. Head
Megan L. Head
JBJanette W. Boughman
Janette W. Boughman
During sexual imprinting, offspring learn parental phenotypes and then select mates who are similar to their parents. Imprinting has been thought to contribute to the process of speciation in only a few rare cases; this is despite imprinting's potential to generate assortative mating and solve the problem of recombination in ecological speciation. If offspring imprint on parental traits under divergent selection, these traits will then be involved in both adaptation and mate preference. Such ‘magic traits’ easily generate sexual isolation and facilitate speciation. In this study, we show that imprinting occurs in two ecologically divergent stickleback species (benthics and limnetics:Gasterosteusspp.). Cross-fostered females preferred mates of their foster father's species. Furthermore, imprinting is essential for sexual isolation between species; isolation was reduced when females were raised without fathers. Daughters imprinted on father odour and colour during a critical period early in development. These traits have diverged between the species owing to differences in ecology. Therefore, we provide the first evidence that imprinting links ecological adaptation to sexual isolation between species. Our results suggest that imprinting may facilitate the evolution of sexual isolation during ecological speciation, may be especially important in cases of rapid diversification, and thus play an integral role in the generation of biodiversity.

1 October 2019 in Current Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GKGenevieve Kozak
Genevieve Kozak
CWCrista B. Wadsworth
Crista B. Wadsworth
SKShoshanna C. Kahne
Shoshanna C. Kahne
SBSteven M. Bogdanowicz
Steven M. Bogdanowicz
RHRichard G. Harrison
Richard G. Harrison
EDErik B Dopman
Erik B Dopman

1 February 2009 in Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GKGenevieve Kozak
Genevieve Kozak
MRMelissa Reisland
Melissa Reisland
JBJanette W. Boughmann
Janette W. Boughmann

27 December 2014 in Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RLRebecca C. Levy
Rebecca C. Levy
GKGenevieve Kozak
Genevieve Kozak
CWCrista B. Wadsworth
Crista B. Wadsworth
BCBrad Coates
Brad Coates
EDErik B Dopman
Erik B Dopman

7 October 2009 in Behavioral Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GKGenevieve Kozak
Genevieve Kozak
JBJanette W. Boughman
Janette W. Boughman
Sexual isolation between species often depends on preferences for conspecific mates. Recent models suggest that whether conspecific preference is determined genetically or learned will affect the process of speciation: Learned conspecific preferences might make speciation more likely. However, we understand little about how often and for which taxa, conspecific preferences are learned. Some species learn conspecific preference by imprinting on conspecifics; others learn from experience with heterospecifics. Even when one sex learns conspecific preference, the other may not. We tested whether conspecific mate preference is learned through social experience in males and females from 2 three-spined stickleback species that show strong sexual isolation (benthics and limnetics: Gasterosteus spp.). We reared fish with either mostly conspecifics or mostly heterospecifics and measured how this experience affected conspecific preference. In both sexes, experience enhanced conspecific mate preference but the sexes differed in the outcome. Females learned to prefer their own species through experience with conspecifics; males learned to discriminate through experience with heterospecifics. We also found species differences in the effect of social experience related to differences in sociality. Our results suggest that learned conspecific mate preference may have facilitated rapid speciation in the post Pleistocene radiation of sticklebacks.