Mutual fund (MF) is one of the applicable and popular tools in investment market. The aim of this paper is to propose an approach for performance evaluation of mutual fund by considering internal structure and financial data uncertainty. To reach this goal, the robust network data envelopment analysis (RNDEA) is presented for extended two-stage structure. In the RNDEA method, leader–follower (non-cooperative game) and robust optimization approaches are applied in order to modeling network data envelopment analysis (NDEA) and dealing with uncertainty, respectively. The proposed RNDEA approach is implemented for performance assessment of 15 mutual funds. Illustrative results show that presented method is applicable and effective for performance evaluation and ranking of MFs in the presence of uncertain data. Also, the results reveal that the discriminatory power of robust NDEA approach is more than the discriminatory power of deterministic NDEA models.

Portfolio construction is one of the most critical problems in financial markets. In this paper, a new two-phase robust portfolio selection and optimization approach is proposed to deal with the uncertainty of the data, increasing the robustness of investment process against uncertainty, decreasing computational complexity, and comprehensive assessments of stocks from different financial aspects and criteria are provided. In the first phase of this approach, all candidate stocks’ efficiency is measured using a robust data envelopment analysis (RDEA) method. Then in the second phase, by applying robust mean-semi variance-liquidity (RMSVL) and robust mean-absolute deviation-liquidity (RMADL) models, the amount of investment in each qualified stock is determined. Finally, the proposed approach is implemented in a real case study of the Tehran stock exchange (TSE). Additionally, a sensitivity analysis of all robust models of this study is examined. Illustrative results show that the proposed approach is effective for portfolio selection and optimization in the presence of uncertain data.

This study presents a two-phase approach of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Goal Programming (GP) for portfolio selection, representing a pioneering attempt at combining these techniques within the context of portfolio selection. The approach expands on the conventional risk and return framework by incorporating additional financial factors and addressing data uncertainty, which allows for a thorough examination of portfolio outcomes while accommodating investor preferences and conservatism levels. The initial phase employs a super-efficiency DEA model to streamline asset selection by identifying suitable investment candidates based on efficiency scores, setting the stage for subsequent portfolio optimization. The second phase leverages the Extended GP (EGP) framework, which facilitates the comprehensive incorporation of investor preferences to determine the optimal weights of the efficient assets previously identified within the portfolio. Each goal is tailored to reflect specific financial factors spanning both technical and fundamental aspects. To tackle data uncertainty, robust optimization is applied. The research contributes to the robust GP (RGP) literature by analyzing new RGP variants, overcoming limitations of traditional and other uncertain GP models by incorporating uncertainty sets. Robust counterparts of the EGP models are accordingly developed using polyhedral and combined interval and polyhedral uncertainty sets, providing a flexible representation of uncertainty in financial markets. Empirical results, based on real data from the Tehran Stock Exchange comprising 779 assets, demonstrate the superiority of the proposed approach over traditional portfolio selection methods across various uncertainty settings. Additionally, a comprehensive sensitivity analysis investigates the impact of uncertainty levels on the robust EGP models. The proposed framework offers guidance to investors and fund managers through a pragmatic approach, enabling informed and robust portfolio decisions by considering efficiency, uncertainty, and extended financial factors.