Vincenzo Di Matteo

Dr. Vincenzo Di Matteo


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2008
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
VMVincenzo Di Matteo
Vincenzo Di Matteo
GDG Digiovanni
G Digiovanni
MPM Pierucci
M Pierucci
EEE Esposito
E Esposito

6 May 2010 in CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Giuseppe Di GiovanniGiuseppe Di Giovanni
Giuseppe Di Giovanni
EEEnnio Esposito
Ennio Esposito
VMVincenzo Di Matteo
Vincenzo Di Matteo

1 June 2006 in Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VMVincenzo Di Matteo
Vincenzo Di Matteo
MPMassimo Pierucci
Massimo Pierucci
Giuseppe Di GiovanniGiuseppe Di Giovanni
Giuseppe Di Giovanni
ASAngelo Di Santo
Angelo Di Santo
APAndreina Poggi
Andreina Poggi
EEEnnio Esposito
Ennio Esposito

1 April 1999 in Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMichele Di Mascio
Michele Di Mascio
Giuseppe Di GiovanniGiuseppe Di Giovanni
Giuseppe Di Giovanni
VMVincenzo Di Matteo
Vincenzo Di Matteo
Emanuela EspositoEmanuela Esposito
Emanuela Esposito

23 February 2025 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VMVincenzo Di Matteo
Vincenzo Di Matteo
PMPierandrea Morandini
Pierandrea Morandini
VSVictor Savevski
Victor Savevski
GGGuido Grappiolo
Guido Grappiolo
MLMattia Loppini
Mattia Loppini
Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a significant and complex complication following total hip and knee arthroplasty. This study aims to design, validate, and assess a machine learning (ML) model for predicting the likelihood of PJI in individuals undergoing revision arthroplasty procedures. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent hip or knee revision arthroplasty between 1 January 2015 and 31 March 2021. Data were collected from preoperative clinical histories, laboratory results, and patient demographics. The final dataset was used to train multiple classification models for the preoperative prediction of PJI. Results: A total of 1360 patients were included, comprising 1141 cases in the aseptic group and 219 in the infected group. The best-performing model, a Linear Support Vector Machine (SVM), demonstrated reasonable predictive capability for PJI, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.770 ± 0.008 in the training set and 0.730 ± 0.078 in the testing set. Additionally, three key predictors of PJI were identified. Conclusions: The Linear SVM model, developed using preoperative clinical information, exhibited reasonable performance in predicting PJI. While further refinement and validation are necessary, integrating ML tools into the preoperative evaluation process has the potential to enhance personalized risk assessment, support informed decision-making, and optimize surgical preparation for patients undergoing prosthetic revision surgery.

11 August 2009
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
VMVincenzo Di Matteo
Vincenzo Di Matteo
MPMassimo Pierucci
Massimo Pierucci
Giuseppe Di GiovanniGiuseppe Di Giovanni
Giuseppe Di Giovanni
LDLuana Katia Dragani
Luana Katia Dragani
SMStefania Murzilli
Stefania Murzilli
EEEnnio Esposito
Ennio Esposito