To explore barriers and facilitators to campus food pantry utilization among international students attending a public university in the southeastern US and to report suggested solutions to address food and nutrition insecurity. A qualitative study was used as a part of a larger explanatory mixed-method design. International students who reported using the campus food pantry were eligible to participate in semistructured interviews, which were analyzed thematically. Thirty international graduate students participated. Barriers and facilitators to campus food pantry utilization largely centered on the quality and variety of culturally appropriate foods, pantry advertisement and operational strategies, individual accessibility barriers, and perceptions of stigma. Extending service hours, improving advertisements and the food supply, and addressing stigma were recommended. Attention to campus food pantry food supply improvements, accessibility concerns, and stigma reduction activities could help to improve food and nutrition security among international students.

Understanding impacts of the COVID-19 pan­demic among households with children is neces­sary to design appropriate public health responses that protect food and nutrition security. The objec­tive of this research was to understand predictors of food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic among households with at least one child (<18 years), including whether foods reported as out-of-stock were associated with the likelihood of food insecurity. An online survey using validated measures and open-ended questions was distrib­uted to a convenience sample in five states—Louisiana, Montana, North Carolina, Oregon, and West Virginia—during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic (April through September of 2020). Predictors of food insecurity (race/ethnicity, age, marital status, education, federal nutrition assistance program participation, number of adults and children in the household, rurality, and missing foods when shopping) among households with children during the COVID-19 pandemic were modeled using logistic regression (p < 0.05, a priori). To further illuminate household experiences during this time, two researchers independently coded open-ended survey question data using inductive and deductive approaches to construct themes. Households with children had increased odds of experiencing food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic if they had the following characteristics: Hispanic ethnicity; age between 25 and 44 years; additional adult household members; economic hardship; SNAP/WIC participation; being widowed, divorced, or separated; and report­ing foods not available when shopping. Partici­pants described mainly negative changes to dietary patterns and practices as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. They also described food security chal­lenges and ideas for improving food security. Con­sistent with other data collected and analyzed dur­ing the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, this study contributes findings that emphasize the need for enhanced public health responses and emer­gency preparedness measures that protect food and nutrition security. Because of the increased short- and long-term consequences including exposure to adverse circumstances, impaired learning, risks to mental health, and poor health outcomes, ensuring an adequate food supply is especially important for households with children.

Background: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) supports Americans with lower income to purchase dietary products at authorized retailers. This research aimed to evaluate SNAP-authorized retailers’ public commitments in support of nutrition security and to examine differences between traditional grocers and nontraditional (e.g., convenience, drug, dollar) SNAP-authorized retailers’ public commitments.Methods: Prominent United States (U.S.) SNAP-authorized retailers nationally and in two U.S. states (California and Virginia) were identified based on number of store locations (n = 61). Public information available in grey literature were reviewed and scored using the Business Impact Assessment for Obesity and population-level nutrition (BIA-Obesity) tool. SNAP-authorized retailers were classified as traditional (e.g., grocery) or nontraditional (e.g., non-grocery) retailers. Total BIA-Obesity from 0 to 615, representing low to optimal support) and category scores were calculated for corporate strategy, relationships with external organizations, product formulation, nutrition labeling, product and brand promotion, and product accessibility. Descriptive statistics were used to describe BIA-Obesity scores overall and by category. Mann–Whitney U was used to test for potential differences in median BIA-Obesity total scores between traditional and nontraditional SNAP-authorized retailers (a priori,p < 0.05).Results: Average total BIA-Obesity scores for SNAP-authorized retailers ranged from 0 to 112 (16.5 ± 23.3). Total BIA-Obesity scores for traditional SNAP-authorized retailers (32.7 ± 33.6; median 25) were higher than nontraditional SNAP-authorized retailer scores (11.2 ± 16; median 5) (p = 0.008). For BIA-Obesity categories, average scores were highest for the category relationships with external organizations (8.3 ± 10.3) and lowest for promotion practices (0.6 ± 2.1).Conclusions: Results of this research underscore a dearth of available evidence and substantial opportunity for improvement regarding SNAP-authorized retailer strategies to support nutrition security among Americans with lower income.

Background: Food insecurity and water insecurity are increasingly recognized as interconnected social determinants of health; however, their co-occurrence remains underexplored in U.S. populations. SNAP households with children experience a high prevalence of both food and water insecurity. This study estimated the prevalence of food insecurity and water insecurity and examined their co-occurrence among SNAP households with children in the Southern U.S. Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted among 683 SNAP participants residing in households with children. Food insecurity was assessed using the 10-item USDA Adult Food Security Survey Module, and water insecurity was measured using the Household Water Insecurity Experiences (HWISE) scale. Descriptive statistics estimated prevalence, and regression analyses assessed associations. Results: Food insecurity (75.1%) and water insecurity (53.9%) were highly prevalent among surveyed SNAP households with children. Nearly half of households (48.6%) experienced both conditions, while 19.6% were secure in both. Food insecurity alone was reported by 26.5% of households, and water insecurity alone by 5.3%. Higher food insecurity scores were associated with increased odds of water insecurity (AOR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.26–1.40, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Food insecurity and water insecurity frequently co-occur among SNAP households with children. Integrated public health strategies addressing both food and water access are needed to reduce disparities and improve household well-being.

Food insecurity is defined as an economic and social condition of limited or uncertain access to adequate food (USDA 2023). Food insecurity continues to be a persistent global issue. The most recen...