James Michael Wakeling

Dr. James Michael Wakeling

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 July 2008 in Journal of Comparative Physiology B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EHEmma F. Hodson-Tole
Emma F. Hodson-Tole
JWJames Michael Wakeling
James Michael Wakeling

27 May 2011 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJames Michael Wakeling
James Michael Wakeling
OBOllie M. Blake
Ollie M. Blake
IWIris Wong
Iris Wong
MRManku Rana
Manku Rana
SLSabrina S. M. Lee
Sabrina S. M. Lee
During muscle contractions, the muscle fascicles may shorten at a rate different from the muscle-tendon unit, and the ratio of these velocities is its gearing. Appropriate gearing allows fascicles to reduce their shortening velocities and allows them to operate at effective shortening velocities across a range of movements. Gearing of the muscle fascicles within the muscle belly is the result of rotations of the fascicles and bulging of the belly. Variable gearing can also occur as a result of tendon length changes that can be caused by changes in the relative timing of muscle activity for different mechanical tasks. Recruitment patterns of slow and fast fibres are crucial for achieving optimal muscle performance, and coordination between muscles is related to whole limb performance. Poor coordination leads to inefficiencies and loss of power, and optimal coordination is required for high power outputs and high mechanical efficiencies from the limb. This paper summarizes key studies in these areas of neuromuscular mechanics and results from studies where we have tested these phenomena on a cycle ergometer are presented to highlight novel insights. The studies show how muscle structure and neural activation interact to generate smooth and effective motion of the body.

1 April 2009 in Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJames Michael Wakeling
James Michael Wakeling

1 December 2017 in Journal of Applied Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TDTaylor Dick
Taylor Dick
JWJames Michael Wakeling
James Michael Wakeling
When muscles contract, they bulge in thickness or in width to maintain a (nearly) constant volume. These dynamic shape changes are tightly linked to the internal constraints placed on individual muscle fibers and play a key functional role in modulating the mechanical performance of skeletal muscle by increasing its range of operating velocities. Yet to date we have a limited understanding of the nature and functional implications of in vivo dynamic muscle shape change under submaximal conditions. This study determined how the in vivo changes in medial gastrocnemius (MG) fascicle velocity, pennation angle, muscle thickness, and subsequent muscle gearing varied as a function of force and velocity. To do this, we obtained recordings of MG tendon length, fascicle length, pennation angle, and thickness using B-mode ultrasound and muscle activation using surface electromyography during cycling at a range of cadences and loads. We found that that increases in contractile force were accompanied by reduced bulging in muscle thickness, reduced increases in pennation angle, and faster fascicle shortening. Although the force and velocity of a muscle contraction are inversely related due to the force-velocity effect, this study has shown how dynamic muscle shape changes are influenced by force and not influenced by velocity.NEW & NOTEWORTHY During movement, skeletal muscles contract and bulge in thickness or width. These shape changes play a key role in modulating the performance of skeletal muscle by increasing its range of operating velocities. Yet to date the underlying mechanisms associated with muscle shape change remain largely unexplored. This study identified muscle force, and not velocity, as the mechanistic driving factor to allow for muscle gearing to vary depending on the contractile conditions during human cycling.

17 February 2012 in Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JWJames Michael Wakeling
James Michael Wakeling
SLSabrina S. M. Lee
Sabrina S. M. Lee
AAAllison S. Arnold
Allison S. Arnold
MMMaria de Boef Miara
Maria de Boef Miara
ABAndrew A. Biewener
Andrew A. Biewener

1 February 2010 in Journal of Experimental Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JWJames Michael Wakeling
James Michael Wakeling
OBO. M. Blake
O. M. Blake
HCH. K. Chan
H. K. Chan
SUMMARY: The purpose of this study was to determine which features of muscle mechanics and muscle coordination affect the power output from a limb during locomotion. Eight subjects were tested while cycling at maximum exertion for 25 min on a stationary dynamometer. Cadence and load were varied to span a range of power outputs and myoelectric activity was measured from 10 muscles in the leg. Cycle-by-cycle variations in muscle coordination, cadence and power output were observed and the EMG intensity across all muscles was used as an estimate of the metabolic cost for each cycle. Data for the cycles at greatest power output were separated into three groups: maximum power, 80% power but lower EMG intensity and 80% power and higher EMG intensity. Torque–angular velocity relations were determined for the ankle and knee joints. During cycling at maximum power output the ankle joint was not extending at the velocity necessary for maximum power output; thus, maximum limb power occurs when some of the individual muscles cannot be generating maximum power output. Increases in EMG intensity occurred with no increase in power output from the limb: these corresponded to decreases in the efficiency and changes in coordination. Increases in power were achieved that were not matched by equivalent increases in EMG intensity, but did occur with changes in coordination. It is proposed that the power output from the limb is limited by the coordination pattern of the muscles rather than the maximum power output from any one muscle itself.