Synthetic biology has developed sophisticated cellular biosensors to detect and respond to human disease. However, biosensors have not yet been engineered to detect specific extracellular DNA sequences and mutations. Here, we engineered naturally competent Acinetobacter baylyi to detect donor DNA from the genomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) cells, organoids, and tumors. We characterized the functionality of the biosensors in vitro with coculture assays and then validated them in vivo with sensor bacteria delivered to mice harboring colorectal tumors. We observed horizontal gene transfer from the tumor to the sensor bacteria in our mouse model of CRC. This cellular assay for targeted, CRISPR-discriminated horizontal gene transfer (CATCH) enables the biodetection of specific cell-free DNA.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common and deadly disease. Unfortunately, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) fail to elicit effective anti-tumour responses in the vast majority of CRC patients. Patients that are most likely to respond are those with DNA mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI) disease. However, reliable predictors of ICI response are lacking, even within the dMMR/MSI subtype. This, together with identification of novel mechanisms to increase response rates and prevent resistance, are ongoing and vitally important unmet needs. To address the current challenges with translation of early research findings into effective therapeutic strategies, this review summarises the present state of preclinical testing used to inform the development of immuno-regulatory treatment strategies for CRC. The shortfalls and advantages of commonly utilised mouse models of CRC, including chemically induced, transplant and transgenic approaches are highlighted. Appropriate use of existing models, incorporation of patient-derived data and development of cutting-edge models that recapitulate important features of human disease will be key to accelerating clinically relevant research in this area.

Probiotics and live bacterial therapeutics are garnering increased attention for use in human health and have the potential to revolutionise the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. However, a pervasive feature of bacteria that must be considered in the design of safe and effective probiotics and live bacterial therapeutics is their capacity for rapid evolution, both at the individual (epi)genetic level and in terms of population dynamics. Here we summarise gastrointestinal-specific evolution of bacteria, focussing on genetic and population levels of adaptation to factors such as carbon source availability, environmental stressors, and interactions with the native microbiome. We also address regulatory and safety considerations for the development of probiotics and live biotherapeutics from an evolutionary perspective, with a discussion of methods that utilise evolution to improve probiotic safety and efficacy via directed evolution, in comparison to another popular approach, genetic engineering.

The last decade has seen a rapid increase in studies utilising a genetically modified probiotic, Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN), as a chassis for cancer treatment and detection. This approach relies on the ability of EcN to home to and selectively colonise tumours over normal tissue, a characteristic common to some bacteria that is thought to result from the low-oxygen, nutrient-rich and immune-privileged niche the tumour provides. Pre-clinical studies have used genetically modified EcN to deliver therapeutic payloads that show efficacy in reducing tumour burden as a result of high-tumour and low off-target colonisation. Most recently, the EcN chassis has been expanded into an effective tumour-detection tool. These advances provide strong justification for the movement of genetically modified EcN into clinical oncology trials. What is currently unknown in the field is a deep mechanistic understanding of how EcN distributes to and localises within tumours. This review summarises the existing EcN literature, with the inclusion of research undertaken with other tumour-homing and pathogenic bacteria, to provide insights into possible mechanisms of EcN tumour homing for future validation. Understanding exactly how and why EcN colonises neoplastic tissue will inform the design and testing of the next generation of EcN chassis strains to address biosafety and containment concerns and optimise the detection and treatment of cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Perhexiline, a prophylactic anti-anginal drug, has been reported to have anti-tumour effects both in vitro and in vivo. Perhexiline as used clinically is a 50:50 racemic mixture ((R)-P) of (−) and (+) enantiomers. It is not known if the enantiomers differ in terms of their effects on cancer. In this study, we examined the cytotoxic capacity of perhexiline and its enantiomers ((−)-P and (+)-P) on CRC cell lines, grown as monolayers or spheroids, and patient-derived organoids. Treatment of CRC cell lines with (R)-P, (−)-P or (+)-P reduced cell viability, with IC₅₀ values of ~4 µM. Treatment was associated with an increase in annexin V staining and caspase 3/7 activation, indicating apoptosis induction. Caspase 3/7 activation and loss of structural integrity were also observed in CRC cell lines grown as spheroids. Drug treatment at clinically relevant concentrations significantly reduced the viability of patient-derived CRC organoids. Given these in vitro findings, perhexiline, as a racemic mixture or its enantiomers, warrants further investigation as a repurposed drug for use in the management of CRC.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastrointestinal tumours is considered a poor prognostic factor, with a median overall survival of six to nine months in the absence of intervention. The advent of patient-derived organoid cultures (PDOs) has provided a breakthrough in personalised medicine, allowing researchers and clinicians to model the complexity and heterogeneity of individual tumours in vitro. PDOs hold great promise in this field, as variations in the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis due to differences in the method of delivery of chemotherapeutics, drug selection, exposure duration, and tumour pathology make it impractical to use a single, standardised treatment regimen. We aim to summarise the methodologies and limitations of studies encapsulating organoids derived from peritoneal metastases to encourage design considerations that may improve future clinical relevance, standardise protocols, and address translational challenges in personalising treatment strategies.