Background: Adequate pain relief, early restoration of breathing, and rapid mobilization pose a clinical challenge in patients with blunt chest trauma. Virtual reality (VR) has the potential to achieve these 3 interrelated treatment objectives with enhanced self-efficacy and autonomy of patients and limited support by clinicians. Objective: This study aimed to assess the effectivity of breathing and physical exercises using VR on the pulmonary recovery of patients with blunt chest trauma at the ward. Methods: A pilot randomized controlled trial was performed. The control group received usual physiotherapy consisting of protocolized breathing exercises (8 times daily for 10 minutes) and physical exercises (2 times daily for 10 minutes). The VR group was instructed to perform these exercises using VR. The primary outcome was vital lung capacity at day 5 or earlier at discharge. Secondary outcomes were patient mobility (time standing, lying, and sitting), clinical outcomes (length of hospital stay, pulmonary complications, transfer to intensive care unit, and readmission within 30 days), pain, activities of daily living, patient-reported outcome measures (satisfaction and quality of recovery). Patient experiences and barriers and facilitators toward implementation were assessed through interviews. Results: The study was prematurely ended due to enrollment failure combined with poor protocol adherence to exercises in both groups. A total of 27 patients were included, of which 19 patients completed 3 or more days. Vital lung capacity at 5 days (or last measurement) was equal between groups with 1830 (SD 591) mL and 1857 (SD 435) mL in the control and VR groups, respectively. No marked differences were observed in secondary outcomes. Patient interviews showed positive attitudes toward the use of VR, describing that visualization of the exercises helped patients to perform the exercises correctly and to continue the exercises for a longer duration. Also, patients experienced the immersiveness of VR as an analgesic. However, patients did not experience added value over usual care and reported that better integration in treatment and the hectic hospital environment could improve the use of the VR exercises. Conclusions: The suitability of patients to use virtual reality therapy (VRx) in a hospital (trauma) ward setting is lower than generally expected. Effective application of VRx requires professional guidance and needs thorough alignment with clinical practice. For future research, we recommend to chart adherence to study protocol before designing a VR clinical trial. Patient-reported experiences need to be prioritized in evaluating VR acceptance, usability, and effectiveness. In line, we recommend performing a systematic analysis (eg, using the technology acceptance model) on the acceptance before pilot or main effectiveness studies. Finally, the eligibility of patients and exclusion of patients due to the inability to use VRx should be routinely reported. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05194176; https://tinyurl.com/2bzh4tzx

Smits I, et al. Hip Pelvis. 2023 Jun;35(2):133-141. https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2023.35.2.133

This study investigates the effectiveness of using Hospital Fit as part of usual care physiotherapy on the physical activity (PA) behavior of hospitalized patients compared to patients who received physiotherapy before implementation of Hospital Fit. In addition, a process evaluation is conducted. A prospective, multi-center, mixed-methods stepped wedge cluster randomized trial was performed at the cardiology and medical oncology departments of two Dutch university medical centers. Patients were included in the non-intervention or intervention phase. During the non-intervention phase, patients received usual care physiotherapy. During the intervention phase, Hospital Fit was additionally used. Mean time spent walking, standing, lying/sitting per day and the number of postural transitions from lying/sitting to standing/walking positions were measured using an accelerometer and analyzed using linear mixed models. A process evaluation was performed using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with patients and focus-group interviews with healthcare professionals. A total of 77 patients were included, and data from 63 patients were used for data analysis. During the intervention phase, the average time spent walking per day was 20 min (95% confidence interval: −2 to 41 min) higher than during the non-intervention phase (p = 0.075). No significant differences were found for mean time spent standing per day, mean time spent lying/sitting per day, or the number of postural transitions per day either. During the intervention phase, 87% of patients used Hospital Fit at least once, with a median daily use of 2.5 to 4.0 times. Patients and healthcare professionals believed that Hospital Fit improved patients’ PA behavior and recovery. Insufficient digital skills and technical issues were described as challenges. Although patients and healthcare professionals described Hospital Fit as an added value, no statistically significant effects were found.

Smits I, et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2025 Oct;17(5):747-753. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24418

BACKGROUND Adequate pain relief, early restoration of breathing, and rapid mobilization pose a clinical challenge in patients with blunt chest trauma. Virtual reality (VR) has the potential to achieve these 3 interrelated treatment objectives with enhanced self-efficacy and autonomy of patients and limited support by clinicians. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the effectivity of breathing and physical exercises using VR on the pulmonary recovery of patients with blunt chest trauma at the ward. METHODS A pilot randomized controlled trial was performed. The control group received usual physiotherapy consisting of protocolized breathing exercises (8 times daily for 10 minutes) and physical exercises (2 times daily for 10 minutes). The VR group was instructed to perform these exercises using VR. The primary outcome was vital lung capacity at day 5 or earlier at discharge. Secondary outcomes were patient mobility (time standing, lying, and sitting), clinical outcomes (length of hospital stay, pulmonary complications, transfer to intensive care unit, and readmission within 30 days), pain, activities of daily living, patient-reported outcome measures (satisfaction and quality of recovery). Patient experiences and barriers and facilitators toward implementation were assessed through interviews. RESULTS The study was prematurely ended due to enrollment failure combined with poor protocol adherence to exercises in both groups. A total of 27 patients were included, of which 19 patients completed 3 or more days. Vital lung capacity at 5 days (or last measurement) was equal between groups with 1830 (SD 591) mL and 1857 (SD 435) mL in the control and VR groups, respectively. No marked differences were observed in secondary outcomes. Patient interviews showed positive attitudes toward the use of VR, describing that visualization of the exercises helped patients to perform the exercises correctly and to continue the exercises for a longer duration. Also, patients experienced the immersiveness of VR as an analgesic. However, patients did not experience added value over usual care and reported that better integration in treatment and the hectic hospital environment could improve the use of the VR exercises. CONCLUSIONS The suitability of patients to use virtual reality therapy (VRx) in a hospital (trauma) ward setting is lower than generally expected. Effective application of VRx requires professional guidance and needs thorough alignment with clinical practice. For future research, we recommend to chart adherence to study protocol before designing a VR clinical trial. Patient-reported experiences need to be prioritized in evaluating VR acceptance, usability, and effectiveness. In line, we recommend performing a systematic analysis (eg, using the technology acceptance model) on the acceptance before pilot or main effectiveness studies. Finally, the eligibility of patients and exclusion of patients due to the inability to use VRx should be routinely reported. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05194176; https://tinyurl.com/2bzh4tzx