This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.

Prof. Moshe Givoni
Head, Transport Research Unit, The Department of Geography and the Human Environment, Tel-Aviv University, P.O.B 39040, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel

Basic Info


Research Keywords & Expertise

0 Rail Transport
0 Air transport
0 Policy Packaging
0 Integrated Transport
0 Air-Rail Integration

Fingerprints

Policy Packaging
Integrated Transport

Honors and Awards

The user has no records in this section


Career Timeline

The user has no records in this section.


Short Biography

The user biography is not available.
Following
Followers
Co Authors
The list of users this user is following is empty.
Following: 0 users

Feed

Journal article
Published: 28 September 2020 in Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
Reads 0
Downloads 0

This study establishes a quantitative relationship between formative mobility, motility and eudemonic well-being. The behavioral framework is proposed as an aid for measuring motility, understanding its driving forces and its derived eudemonic well-being. Formative mobility consists of past mobility experiences, aquired mobility resources and socio-economic characteristics. Motility is assessed through components of personal access, skills and cognitive appropriation and cover: neighborhood mobility qualities, residential access qualities, mobility skills, travel self-confidence, openness to new people and places. Eudemonic well-being is measured using the three aspects of the Self-Determination Theory: autonomy, relatedness and competencies. A tailor made questionnaire was designed to collect the data. The proposed behavioral framework is validated with a structural-equation model estimated based on a sample of 822 women in Israel. The results show: i) past mobility experiences and aquired travel resources are positively correlated with current perceived motility, ii) mobility skills, travel self-confidence, openness to new people and places are associated with autonomy and environmental mastery, ii) openness to people and places is linked to a higher degree of self-acceptance, iii) mobility skills are positively related to higher personal growth and purpose, iv) access, mobility skills and openness to new people and places is linked to positive relations with others (relatedness).

ACS Style

Rebecca Shliselberg; Moshe Givoni; Sigal Kaplan. A behavioral framework for measuring motility: Linking past mobility experiences, motility and eudemonic well-being. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2020, 141, 69 -85.

AMA Style

Rebecca Shliselberg, Moshe Givoni, Sigal Kaplan. A behavioral framework for measuring motility: Linking past mobility experiences, motility and eudemonic well-being. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2020; 141 ():69-85.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rebecca Shliselberg; Moshe Givoni; Sigal Kaplan. 2020. "A behavioral framework for measuring motility: Linking past mobility experiences, motility and eudemonic well-being." Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 141, no. : 69-85.

Review
Published: 20 March 2020 in Sustainability
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Urban mobility is facing an increased long-term uncertainty and complexity generated by accelerated technological development. These challenges require radical advancement in planning processes and methods, which could enable breaking out of path dependencies and unlocking alternative, sustainable futures. In order to provide a landscape overview of foresight-focused methods used in the domain of urban mobility, we conduct a systematic literature review. An analytical framework for review is based on planning knowledge taxonomy, including dialectic between knowing how/what and knowing to what end and doing. Such framework formulation is aiming to assess methodological capacity for widening system boundary and holism (object-focus) as well as integration and imagination (process-focus). Results show that the overall trend of methodological development is emphasizing development in object or process-focus domain, but rarely both. In addition to this assessment, we conclude that methodological development should further reflect the moral and democratic dimension concerning public deliberation. Such development should aim to create spaces for shared discussion, reflection, and formation of alternative futures, while allowing spaces for agonistic contestation and conflicting opinions through radical, experimental, and experiential approaches.

ACS Style

Helena Sustar; Miloš N. Mladenović; Moshe Givoni. The Landscape of Envisioning and Speculative Design Methods for Sustainable Mobility Futures. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2447 .

AMA Style

Helena Sustar, Miloš N. Mladenović, Moshe Givoni. The Landscape of Envisioning and Speculative Design Methods for Sustainable Mobility Futures. Sustainability. 2020; 12 (6):2447.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Helena Sustar; Miloš N. Mladenović; Moshe Givoni. 2020. "The Landscape of Envisioning and Speculative Design Methods for Sustainable Mobility Futures." Sustainability 12, no. 6: 2447.

Research article
Published: 06 March 2019 in Regional Science Policy & Practice
Reads 0
Downloads 0

This is a conceptual paper that argues that bus services in the form of a new product, named the High‐Speed Bus (HSB) could be an attractive alternative to investment in High‐Speed Rail (HSR) on some corridors. A proposal by the Israeli government to build an HSR connecting Tel Aviv in the center of the country with the city of Eilat in the South is used as a case study to examine the HSB concept. Comparison between the HSR and HSB alternatives is made in general terms and with respect to investment, direct transport impacts and non‐transport impacts. Not aiming to provide a full evaluation, the comparison demonstrates unequivocally that developing bus services could be a viable and superior alternative to the HSR in many circumstances.

ACS Style

Moshe Givoni. The high‐speed bus (HSB) as an alternative to the high‐speed rail (HSR): A conceptual approach examined through a case study. Regional Science Policy & Practice 2019, 12, 507 -518.

AMA Style

Moshe Givoni. The high‐speed bus (HSB) as an alternative to the high‐speed rail (HSR): A conceptual approach examined through a case study. Regional Science Policy & Practice. 2019; 12 (3):507-518.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moshe Givoni. 2019. "The high‐speed bus (HSB) as an alternative to the high‐speed rail (HSR): A conceptual approach examined through a case study." Regional Science Policy & Practice 12, no. 3: 507-518.

Journal article
Published: 04 October 2018 in Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Rural and peripheral areas with low population density and long travel distances challenge the supply of public transport service. The objective of this paper is to analyze which type of public transport service best fit the periphery and compare alternative services based on a set of quantities and qualitative measures with emphasize on equity considerations. We applied for the first time the Potential Mobility Index (PMI) developed by Martens (2016) to analyze the equity implications of the alternatives. We applied it in a new and unique way with two measures of travel time: in-vehicle travel time and door to door travel time. The research applies the methodology to a case study of Israel’s peripheral cities. Two different alternative services were analyzed: high-speed rail to the Northern and Southern peripheral cities, and a fix schedule regional BRT shuttle service with a timed transfer to rail hubs near the periphery. The accessibility measures show that the rail service to the periphery provides high accessibility, however, the demand analysis suggests that the demand would be low to justify high-speed rail service. The analysis of the in-vehicle time PMI shows an advantage to the high-speed rail alternative, however, the door to door calculation of PMI shows that the BRT service gives better PMI scores to all the peripheral cities that we examined and can be effective in providing a high quality of service to the periphery. The results provide some insights for research and service planning in rural areas and found some generalization to equity aspects in the periphery dilemma.

ACS Style

Nir Sharav; Moshe Givoni; Yoram Shiftan. What transit service does the periphery need? A case study of Israel’s rural country. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2018, 125, 320 -333.

AMA Style

Nir Sharav, Moshe Givoni, Yoram Shiftan. What transit service does the periphery need? A case study of Israel’s rural country. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2018; 125 ():320-333.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nir Sharav; Moshe Givoni; Yoram Shiftan. 2018. "What transit service does the periphery need? A case study of Israel’s rural country." Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 125, no. : 320-333.

Journal article
Published: 02 July 2018 in TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis
Reads 0
Downloads 0
ACS Style

Torsten Fleischer; Jens Schippl; Moshe Givoni. Interview with Prof. Moshe Givoni. TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis 2018, 27, 68 -71.

AMA Style

Torsten Fleischer, Jens Schippl, Moshe Givoni. Interview with Prof. Moshe Givoni. TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis. 2018; 27 (2):68-71.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Torsten Fleischer; Jens Schippl; Moshe Givoni. 2018. "Interview with Prof. Moshe Givoni." TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis 27, no. 2: 68-71.

Journal article
Published: 02 July 2018 in TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis
Reads 0
Downloads 0
ACS Style

Torsten Fleischer; Jens Schippl; Moshe Givoni. Interview with Prof. Moshe Givoni. TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis 2018, 27, 68 -71.

AMA Style

Torsten Fleischer, Jens Schippl, Moshe Givoni. Interview with Prof. Moshe Givoni. TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis. 2018; 27 (2):68-71.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Torsten Fleischer; Jens Schippl; Moshe Givoni. 2018. "Interview with Prof. Moshe Givoni." TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis 27, no. 2: 68-71.

Journal article
Published: 30 May 2018 in Energies
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Recently, there has been wider acknowledgement that sustainable urban mobility will not be triggered by one ‘silver bullet’ policy, or by piling up various policies, but requires a deliberate package of policies. Until recently, studies on policy instrument (or measure) interaction have been primarily ex-ante studies, estimating interactions in the future. However, from an evidence-based policy-making perspective, ex-ante evaluations need to use knowledge gained through ex-post evaluations, a crucial link in the policy cycle. To contribute to the strengthening of this poor link, this paper provides an ex-post analysis of instrument interaction in four northwest European, medium-sized cities: Bruges, Ghent, Jena & Erfurt. By exposing the relationships between the range of mobility policies implemented in relation to modal shift achieved, we offer insight into the crucial difference between ‘piling up policies’ and deliberate policy packages. As such, the paper offers evidence to inform ex-ante analysis for urban mobility policy-making and contributes to policy learning as part of effective governance.

ACS Style

Marc Dijk; Moshe Givoni; Karen Diederiks. Piling up or Packaging Policies? An Ex-Post Analysis of Modal Shift in Four Cities. Energies 2018, 11, 1400 .

AMA Style

Marc Dijk, Moshe Givoni, Karen Diederiks. Piling up or Packaging Policies? An Ex-Post Analysis of Modal Shift in Four Cities. Energies. 2018; 11 (6):1400.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marc Dijk; Moshe Givoni; Karen Diederiks. 2018. "Piling up or Packaging Policies? An Ex-Post Analysis of Modal Shift in Four Cities." Energies 11, no. 6: 1400.

Journal article
Published: 06 February 2018 in Sustainability
Reads 0
Downloads 0

One of the main evolving trends in the transport system is the assimilation of Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs) and other sophisticated hi-technology innovations into it. Those processes and practices are increasingly referred to as the “Smart Mobility” paradigm. In this paradigm, ‘smart’ and ‘sustainable’ are often considered synonymous, or at least complementary to each other. This research aims to examine the extent to which ‘smart’ and ‘sustainable’ are aligned with each other by conducting a survey amongst the main actors within smart mobility. These actors are referred to as transport innovators or entrepreneurs. The survey of n = 117 entrepreneurs shows that there is a mismatch between interpretation and understanding of what is ‘smart’ and what is ‘sustainable’. It is clear that the concern of those transport entrepreneurs is primarily with commercial considerations and that their appreciation of what it takes to advance towards a more sustainable transport system is lacking. The belief amongst those entrepreneurs, it emerges, is that technological developments alone, specifically with respect to autonomous and connected vehicles, can lead to sustainable transport. This should be a real concern if those same actors are the ones who lead and pave the way forward for transport planning.

ACS Style

Kfir Noy; Moshe Givoni. Is ‘Smart Mobility’ Sustainable? Examining the Views and Beliefs of Transport’s Technological Entrepreneurs. Sustainability 2018, 10, 422 .

AMA Style

Kfir Noy, Moshe Givoni. Is ‘Smart Mobility’ Sustainable? Examining the Views and Beliefs of Transport’s Technological Entrepreneurs. Sustainability. 2018; 10 (2):422.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kfir Noy; Moshe Givoni. 2018. "Is ‘Smart Mobility’ Sustainable? Examining the Views and Beliefs of Transport’s Technological Entrepreneurs." Sustainability 10, no. 2: 422.

Journal article
Published: 06 February 2018 in Sustainability
Reads 0
Downloads 0

The role of governments in the regulation of potentially beneficial low carbon practices, such as car sharing, has proved difficult, as there are many different actors involved and as existing practices can be undermined. The mobility sector provides clear evidence of these dilemmas, as a wide range of users need to be engaged in the discourse over the innovations, and as existing governance structures may be unsuitable for addressing both the opportunities and limitations of innovation. This paper focuses on the sustainability implications of shared mobility and the need for new approaches to governance. A qualitative study of car sharing in London is used to examine the ideas, incentives, and institutions of the key actors involved in this sharing sector. The elements of change and continuity in the emerging sharing economy indicate the different possibilities for enhancing sustainable mobility. Any search for an alternative governance regime should take account of the ideational factors that would require an understanding of the different incentives needed to accommodate the full range of actors involved with the sharing economy.

ACS Style

Nihan Akyelken; David Banister; Moshe Givoni. The Sustainability of Shared Mobility in London: The Dilemma for Governance. Sustainability 2018, 10, 420 .

AMA Style

Nihan Akyelken, David Banister, Moshe Givoni. The Sustainability of Shared Mobility in London: The Dilemma for Governance. Sustainability. 2018; 10 (2):420.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nihan Akyelken; David Banister; Moshe Givoni. 2018. "The Sustainability of Shared Mobility in London: The Dilemma for Governance." Sustainability 10, no. 2: 420.

Research article
Published: 25 December 2017 in Journal of Planning Education and Research
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Contemporary transport infrastructure planning typically rests upon the core belief that physical mobility has inherent advantages and that more of it will always yield better socioeconomic outcomes. Such an embrace of maximum growth yields a misguided calculus for planning transport infrastructure. Rather than seeking to meet the demand for future mobility by reflexively expanding the quantity of infrastructure, there is a need to consider alternatives that can support a sustainable future. By applying the “half-life” concept to transport infrastructure, this article explores alternatives to extending its use over time that can open up new possibilities for generating and extending its value to society.

ACS Style

Moshe Givoni; Anthony Perl. Rethinking Transport Infrastructure Planning to Extend Its Value over Time. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2017, 40, 82 -91.

AMA Style

Moshe Givoni, Anthony Perl. Rethinking Transport Infrastructure Planning to Extend Its Value over Time. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2017; 40 (1):82-91.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moshe Givoni; Anthony Perl. 2017. "Rethinking Transport Infrastructure Planning to Extend Its Value over Time." Journal of Planning Education and Research 40, no. 1: 82-91.

Journal article
Published: 16 February 2017 in Transportation Letters
Reads 0
Downloads 0
ACS Style

Moshe Givoni; Xueming Chen. Airline and railway disintegration in China: the case of Shanghai Hongqiao Integrated Transport Hub. Transportation Letters 2017, 9, 202 -214.

AMA Style

Moshe Givoni, Xueming Chen. Airline and railway disintegration in China: the case of Shanghai Hongqiao Integrated Transport Hub. Transportation Letters. 2017; 9 (4):202-214.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moshe Givoni; Xueming Chen. 2017. "Airline and railway disintegration in China: the case of Shanghai Hongqiao Integrated Transport Hub." Transportation Letters 9, no. 4: 202-214.

Editorial
Published: 29 September 2016 in Transport Reviews
Reads 0
Downloads 0
ACS Style

Moshe Givoni. Why review? Transport Reviews 2016, 37, 1 -3.

AMA Style

Moshe Givoni. Why review? Transport Reviews. 2016; 37 (1):1-3.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moshe Givoni. 2016. "Why review?" Transport Reviews 37, no. 1: 1-3.

Articles
Published: 20 June 2016 in Planning Theory & Practice
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Transport demand models have a long history of being a major tool in transport policy making. However, whether they are truly used in decision-making processes, and if so, whether the knowledge they provide is actually understood, is questionable. The potential contribution they can make and the importance of such models is not disputed; however, evidence shows that many issues arise with their actual use that severely limits their potential contribution. Based on case study methodology and analysis of the use of models in the transport policy processes in two countries, the UK and Israel, this paper aims to provide empirical evidence of the issues contributing to limiting the potential contribution of models and to make recommendations for better utilisation of the knowledge they can produce. The main conclusion reached is that transport models must be made simpler if they are to contribute more than they currently do to decision-making in transport policy and planning.

ACS Style

Moshe Givoni; Eda Beyazit; Yoram Shiftan. The use of state-of-the-art transport models by policymakers – beauty in simplicity? Planning Theory & Practice 2016, 17, 1 -20.

AMA Style

Moshe Givoni, Eda Beyazit, Yoram Shiftan. The use of state-of-the-art transport models by policymakers – beauty in simplicity? Planning Theory & Practice. 2016; 17 (3):1-20.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moshe Givoni; Eda Beyazit; Yoram Shiftan. 2016. "The use of state-of-the-art transport models by policymakers – beauty in simplicity?" Planning Theory & Practice 17, no. 3: 1-20.

Journal article
Published: 01 December 2015 in Journal of Transport Geography
Reads 0
Downloads 0
ACS Style

Moshe Givoni. Transport and transport geography in Israel: In-between “local” and “international”. Journal of Transport Geography 2015, 49, 112 -113.

AMA Style

Moshe Givoni. Transport and transport geography in Israel: In-between “local” and “international”. Journal of Transport Geography. 2015; 49 ():112-113.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moshe Givoni. 2015. "Transport and transport geography in Israel: In-between “local” and “international”." Journal of Transport Geography 49, no. : 112-113.

Journal article
Published: 21 November 2015 in European Journal of Futures Research
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Certain developed countries have experienced the ‘peak car’ phenomenon. While this remains to be confirmed longitudinally, it looks certain that future mobility in Europe and elsewhere will be shaped by a particular technological development: driverless or autonomous transport. The ‘autonomous car’ ignites the imagination, yet the research and debate on this topic largely focus on the ‘autonomous’ and not adequately on the ‘car’ element. Like any new technological development, autonomous transport presents ample opportunities to better our mobility system, but similarly it carries risks and can lead into a future mobility that exacerbates, rather than relieves, current deficiencies of our mobility systems, including its high carbon and high cost characteristics. Now it is high time to explore these, before we lock ourselves into the autonomous car future. Using Low Carbon Mobility (LCM) as a guiding framework to assess mobility patterns and based on an extensive literature review, this paper aims to explore where there is a gap between the likely and desirable outcomes when developing the autonomous car and suggest how we might reduce it. Moreover, enhancing on global empirical evidence and forecasts about the opportunities and threats emerging from ICT deployment in transport and initial evidence on the development of the autonomous car, the paper concludes that a desirable outcome will only come if technological development will be accompanied by a social change. A change where public and sharing will be seen as superior to private and individual transport, could make the autonomous car a blessing.

ACS Style

Nikolas Thomopoulos; Moshe Givoni. The autonomous car—a blessing or a curse for the future of low carbon mobility? An exploration of likely vs. desirable outcomes. European Journal of Futures Research 2015, 3, 1 -14.

AMA Style

Nikolas Thomopoulos, Moshe Givoni. The autonomous car—a blessing or a curse for the future of low carbon mobility? An exploration of likely vs. desirable outcomes. European Journal of Futures Research. 2015; 3 (1):1-14.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nikolas Thomopoulos; Moshe Givoni. 2015. "The autonomous car—a blessing or a curse for the future of low carbon mobility? An exploration of likely vs. desirable outcomes." European Journal of Futures Research 3, no. 1: 1-14.

Editorial
Published: 25 February 2014 in Transport Reviews
Reads 0
Downloads 0
ACS Style

Moshe Givoni. What to Review? Transport Reviews 2014, 34, 125 -127.

AMA Style

Moshe Givoni. What to Review? Transport Reviews. 2014; 34 (2):125-127.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moshe Givoni. 2014. "What to Review?" Transport Reviews 34, no. 2: 125-127.

Journal article
Published: 01 February 2014 in Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
Reads 0
Downloads 0
ACS Style

Andreas Justen; Nils Fearnley; Moshe Givoni; James Macmillen. A process for designing policy packaging: Ideals and realities. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2014, 60, 9 -18.

AMA Style

Andreas Justen, Nils Fearnley, Moshe Givoni, James Macmillen. A process for designing policy packaging: Ideals and realities. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2014; 60 ():9-18.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Andreas Justen; Nils Fearnley; Moshe Givoni; James Macmillen. 2014. "A process for designing policy packaging: Ideals and realities." Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 60, no. : 9-18.

Review
Published: 27 November 2013 in Transport Reviews
Reads 0
Downloads 0

To date, relatively little is known about the nature of the demand for high-speed rail (HSR) soon after inauguration of the services, despite close to 50-year experience of HSR operation and 17 166 km of HSR network around the world. This is a real lacuna given the scale of HSR construction around the world, the amount of resources committed to it, the desired accessibility, economic and environmental effects associated with HSR development and the relatively poor track record of forecasting demand for HSR services. Focusing on mode substitution and induced demand effects, this review aims to fill the gap in knowledge about the ex-post demand for HSR services in order to facilitate a learning process for the planning of the future HSR network. Although there is not much evidence on the demand for HSR services and existing evidence is largely influenced by route-specific characteristics, a methodological limitation that must be acknowledged, the evidence presented allows a better characterisation of HSR as a mode of transport. The review shows that the demand for HSR a few years after inauguration is about 10–20% induced demand and the rest is attributed to mode substitution. In terms of mode substitution, in most cases the majority of HSR passengers have used the conventional rail before. Substitution from aircraft, car and coach is generally more modest.

ACS Style

Moshe Givoni; Frédéric Dobruszkes. A Review of Ex-Post Evidence for Mode Substitution and Induced Demand Following the Introduction of High-Speed Rail. Transport Reviews 2013, 33, 720 -742.

AMA Style

Moshe Givoni, Frédéric Dobruszkes. A Review of Ex-Post Evidence for Mode Substitution and Induced Demand Following the Introduction of High-Speed Rail. Transport Reviews. 2013; 33 (6):720-742.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moshe Givoni; Frédéric Dobruszkes. 2013. "A Review of Ex-Post Evidence for Mode Substitution and Induced Demand Following the Introduction of High-Speed Rail." Transport Reviews 33, no. 6: 720-742.

Original articles
Published: 01 January 2013 in Transport Reviews
Reads 0
Downloads 0

It is increasingly evident that harnessing the potential synergetic relationships that exist between certain policy measures can significantly increase the effectiveness and efficiency of policy interventions. However, while normative sentiments of “integrated policy” and “joined-up government” are well-established, minimal academic attention has, thus far, been paid to considerations of how such relationships might be strategically advanced in promoting effective policy interventions. Framed in relation to transport policy, this paper, thus, tentatively proposes a heuristic framework that seeks to engage with the major conceptual and procedural concerns involved in bona fide “policy packaging”. Wary of naive prescription, the framework is not intended to function as a universal blueprint for policy-making. Rather, we aim to critically examine a number of salient principles that appear to have generic policy relevance across institutional contexts and jurisdictional scales. Fundamentally, the paper argues that while policy packaging can certainly support effective and efficient policy-making—not least through enhancing interventions' implementation and the ex ante mitigation of unintended effects—the packaging process requires a deep and holistic appreciation of policy subsystems, together with a structured approach, if its benefits are to be genuinely realized.

ACS Style

Moshe Givoni; James Macmillen; David Banister; Eran Feitelson. From Policy Measures to Policy Packages. Transport Reviews 2013, 33, 1 -20.

AMA Style

Moshe Givoni, James Macmillen, David Banister, Eran Feitelson. From Policy Measures to Policy Packages. Transport Reviews. 2013; 33 (1):1-20.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moshe Givoni; James Macmillen; David Banister; Eran Feitelson. 2013. "From Policy Measures to Policy Packages." Transport Reviews 33, no. 1: 1-20.