Background and Objectives: Breast cancer (BC) is a global health concern for women; the disease contributes to significant morbidity and mortality. A key element in the diagnosis of BC involves the histopathological diagnosis, which determines patient management and therapy. However, BC is a multifaceted disease, limiting access to early diagnosis and, therefore, treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming diagnostics in the medical field, especially in the detection of BC. Due to the increased availability of digital slides, it has facilitated the effective integration of AI in breast cancer diagnosis. Diagnosis poses a great challenge, even for experienced pathologists, due to the heterogeneity of this malignancy. Analysing microscopic slides by pathologists requires a considerable amount of time. Implementation of AI into routine workflows holds potential to improve diagnostic sensitivity and inter-observer concordance, and to increase efficiency by reducing the review time, thereby helping to alleviate the burden of diagnosing BC. Previous studies mainly address imaging modalities or oncology broadly, while a few specifically concentrates on the histopathological aspect of breast cancer. This review aims to explore the novel synthesis of AI advancements in digital pathology, including tumour classification, grading, lymph node staging, and biomarker evaluation, and discuss their potential incorporation into clinical workflows. We will also discuss the current barriers and prospects for future advancements. Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar using the mentioned keywords. Articles published in English until July 2025 were reviewed and synthesised narratively. Results: Recent studies demonstrate that AI models such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), YOLO, and RetinaNet achieve high accuracy in tumour detection, histological grading, lymph node metastasis localisation, and biomarker analysis. The reported performance values range from 75% to over 95% accuracy across various tasks, with gains in diagnostic sensitivity and inter-observer concordance, and reduced review time in assisted workflows. However, certain limitations, such as data variability, external validation in clinical practice, and ethical concerns, restrict the growth and optimal performance of AI and its clinical applicability. Conclusions: The future for AI looks promising, as it is rapidly evolving. By analysing evidence across multiple domains, this review evaluates both opportunities and persisting barriers, offering practical overviews for future clinical transition. AI cannot replace pathologists; however, it has the capabilities to enhance diagnostic precision, efficiency, and ultimately patient outcomes. It is only a matter of time before AI is adopted into healthcare.

The development of the Gleason grading system has proven to be an irreplaceable tool in prostate cancer diagnostics within urology. Despite the advancements and developments in diagnostics, there remains a discrepancy in the grading process among even the most experienced pathologists. AI algorithms have demonstrated potential in detecting cancer and assigning Gleason grades, offering a solution to the issue of significant variability among pathologists’ evaluations. Our paper explores the evolving role of AI in prostate cancer histopathology, with a key focus on outcomes and the reliability of various AI algorithms for Gleason pattern assessment. We conducted a non-systematic review of the published literature to examine the role of artificial intelligence in Gleason pattern diagnostics. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched to gather pertinent information about recent advancements in artificial intelligence and their impact on Gleason patterns. We found that AI algorithms are increasingly being used to identify Gleason patterns in prostate cancer, with recent studies showing promising advancements that surpass traditional diagnostic methods. These findings highlight AI’s potential to be integrated into clinical practice, enhancing pathologists’ workflows and improving patient outcomes. The inter-observer variability in Gleason grading has seen an improvement in efficiency with the implementation of AI. Pathologists using AI have reported successful outcomes, demonstrating its effectiveness as a supplementary tool. While some refinements are still needed before AI can be fully implemented in clinical practice, its positive impact is anticipated soon.

Background: Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostics for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) provide valuable information for classification and subtyping, which improve treatment options and patient care. RCC diagnoses are most commonly incidental due to a lack of specific characterizations of subtypes, often leading to overtreatment. Accurate diagnosis also allows for personalized patient management. Different diagnostic methods, such as histopathology, multi-omics, imaging, and perioperative diagnostics, show a lot of promise for AI. Objective: This literature review focuses on developments in RCC diagnostics and their outcomes, efficacy, and accuracy in classification. Method: We conducted a non-systematic review of the published literature to explore advancements in the diagnostics of RCC. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were reviewed to extract relevant information. The literature shows that AI can help distinguish RCC from other kidney lesions and track tumor growth. The integration of radiomic features with clinical metadata further enhances the results. This enables clinicians to implement personalized treatment plans. The application of artificial intelligence in perioperative diagnostics enhances decision-making, improves patient safety, mitigates intraoperative complications, and accelerates recovery. Alongside the advancements in AI-assisted diagnostics, there are problems that need to be addressed, including selection bias, demand for larger and diverse datasets, and reliable validation. Conclusions: Despite the challenges, using AI to help with RCC diagnosis could lead to better patient outcomes, a new standard of care for RCC patients, and more personalized cancer management for each patient.

Background and Objectives: Because of its consistently high stone-free rates (SFRs), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) continues to be the first-line treatment for renal stones larger than 20 mm. Standard 24 to 30 Fr access tracts, however, are linked to access-related morbidity, such as bleeding, pain, and extended hospital stays. These restrictions have led to progressive tract miniaturization and the development of mini-PCNL, ultra-mini PCNL, and micro-PCN techniques. Materials and Methods: We performed a narrative review of studies published through January 2026 using PubMed and Google Scholar. Search terms included percutaneous nephrolithotomy, mini-PCNL, ultra-mini PCNL, micro-PCNL, and vacuum-assisted PCNL. Original studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses reporting clinical outcomes, complications, and advancements were selected, whereas conference abstracts, non-English papers, and articles without accessible full text were excluded. Results: Across randomized trials, miniaturized PCNL generally preserves efficacy when patients are selected appropriately. Across randomized trials and meta-analyses, miniaturized PCNL achieved stone-free rates comparable to standard PCNL (typically ~80–90% for stones ≤20 mm and similar rates in selected stones >2 cm), while demonstrating lower hemoglobin decrease (mean difference approximately −0.6 to −1.0 g/dL), reduced transfusion rates, and shorter hospital stays, at the cost of longer operative time (mean difference ~8–12 min). On the other hand, operative time may increase, and smaller working channels can make visualization and fragment evacuation more demanding as stone burden rises. Raised intrarenal pressure is a recurring safety issue because it may increase infectious risk unless drainage is actively managed. Recent innovations aim to address these limitations, including vacuum-assisted access sheaths, pressure-controlled irrigation, improved laser and lithotripsy platforms, image-fusion guidance, navigation systems, and robotic assistance. Conclusions: PCNL now spans a spectrum of tract sizes rather than a single standard approach. When chosen appropriately and performed with attention to pressure control and fragment evacuation, miniaturized PCNL can reduce morbidity without sacrificing stone clearance. Future advancements in percutaneous stone surgery are more likely to rely on integrated technological solutions that improve accuracy, safety, and repeatability than on additional tract size reduction.

The ongoing growth of artificial intelligence (AI) involves virtually every aspect of oncologic care in medicine. Although AI is in its infancy, it has shown great promise in the diagnosis of oncologic urological conditions. This paper aims to explore the expanding role of artificial intelligence in the histopathological diagnosis in urological oncology. We conducted a focused review of the literature on AI in urological oncology, searching PubMed and Google Scholar for recent advancements in histopathological diagnosis using AI. Various keyword combinations were used to find relevant sources published before April 2nd, 2024. We approached this article by focusing on the impact of AI on common urological malignancies by incorporating the use of different AI algorithms. We targeted the capabilities of AI’s potential in aiding urologists and pathologists in histological cancer diagnosis. Promising results suggest AI can enhance diagnosis and personalized patient care, yet further refinements are needed before widespread hospital adoption. AI is transforming urological oncology by improving histopathological diagnosis and patient care. This review highlights AI’s advancements in diagnosing prostate, renal cell, and bladder cancer. It is anticipated that as AI becomes more integrated into clinical practice, it will have a greater influence on diagnosis and improve patient outcomes.

Endometriosis is a chronic, debilitating condition affecting approximately 10–15% of reproductive-aged women and it is often associated with significant diagnostic delays due to its heterogeneity and unreliable non-invasive tests. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers innovative methods for improving endometriosis diagnosis, prognosis and research via advanced pattern recognition and data analysis capabilities. The integration of AI in diagnostic workflow has the potential to improve efficiency, accuracy, and patient outcomes. This review summarises current developments of AI—including machine learning, deep learning, and natural language processing—in the diagnostic workflow of endometriosis. It analyses different fields of diagnostics ranging from AI-assisted imaging in detection of pouch of Douglas to multi-omics biomarkers assisting the clinical decision process. AI can enhance accuracy, reducing diagnostic delays and supporting personalised treatment planning. However, there are multiple limitations, such as small datasets, overfitting, and lack of external validation and variability. Further research and evaluation are required before it can be implemented into healthcare systems. AI holds promise as a non-invasive, scalable adjunct to current diagnostics, potentially reducing the economic and personal burden endometriosis carries.