Low-profile, self-expandable stents are used to treat wide-neck aneurysms located on the smaller distal intracranial arteries. This study aimed to assess the usefulness of time-of-flight (TOF) and contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for follow-up after LEO Baby stent (LBS)-assisted coil embolization. Twenty-four aneurysms treated with LBS-assisted coil embolization were evaluated. Researchers reviewed TOF MRA and CE MRA images in terms of occlusion and stent patency. Aneurysm occlusion was graded according to Raymond–Roy classification as follows: total occlusion (grade 1), residual neck (grade 2), and residual aneurysm (grade 3). Stent patency was scored as follows: occlusion (1), stenosis (2), and normal (3). Interobserver and intermodality agreement values were determined by weighted kappa (κ) statistics. Intermodality and interobserver values of TOF MRA and CE MRA with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were perfect (κ = 1.00, p < 0.001) in terms of aneurysm occlusion. Rate of stent occlusion and stenosis in DSA, TOF, and MRA, respectively, were as follows: 0 and 12.5%, 16.6 and 70.8%, and 0 and 62.5%. Intermodality agreement values of TOF MRA and CE MRA with DSA were insignificant in terms of stent patency (κ = 0.065, p = 0.27; κ = 0.158, p = 0.15, respectively). Interobserver agreement was substantial in both TOF MRA (κ = 0.71, p < 0.001) and CE MRA (κ = 0.64, p = 0.001). Both TOF and CE MRA techniques have strong concordance with DSA for the detection of aneurysm occlusion status. CE MRA can be used as a first-line noninvasive imaging modality due to its superiority to TOF MRA with respect to the visualization of in-stent signals.

The current literature reports a wide range of diagnostic accuracy of non-contrast magnetic resonance coronary angiography (NC-MRCA) for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of NC-MRCA with that of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in patients with suspected CAD using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Two investigators independently extracted 36 published manuscripts between 2010 and 2019. Databases including Medline, Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched using pre-established keywords. Analysis of the data followed the PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses and primary analysis followed the Mantel-Hansel methodology. Correctness of classification for detecting coronary artery stenosis ≥50% (CAS) was measured using ICA as the gold standard. A total of five studies met inclusion criteria, with a total of 417 patients and 2883 coronary segments. The pooled per patient sensitivity and specificity of NC-MRCA for CAS in suspected patients was 90.3% (95% CI 85.6–95.1%) and 77.9% (95% CI 69.5–86.3%). Pooled per vessel assessment of NC- MRCA revealed a sensitivity of 83.7% (95%CI 79.7–87.8%) and specificity of 90.0% (95%CI 86.7–93.4%). Per-segment assessment of NC-MRCA showed a pooled sensitivity of 81.6% (95% CI 76.8–86.4) and specificity of 97.0% (95% CI 95.5–98.5). Mild to moderate heterogeneity was noted in most diagnostic parameters with larger heterogeneity noted in the per-segment analyses. There was less heterogeneity in sensitivity and NPV than specificity and PPV. According to this meta-analysis, non-contrast coronary MRA resulted in adequate screening in patients with suspected CAD with high sensitivity and specificity. This result was true for per-patient, per-vessel, and per-segment assessment.

Sarcoidosis,mediastinal Lymphadenopathy,thorax computed tomography