The human–robot interaction (HRI) field goes beyond the mere technical aspects of developing robots, often investigating how humans perceive robots. Human perceptions and behavior are determined, in part, by expectations. Given the impact of expectations on behavior, it is important to understand what expectations individuals bring into HRI settings and how those expectations may affect their interactions with the robot over time. For many people, social robots are not a common part of their experiences, thus any expectations they have of social robots are likely shaped by other sources. As a result, individual expectations coming into HRI settings may be highly variable. Although there has been some recent interest in expectations within the field, there is an overall lack of empirical investigation into its impacts on HRI, especially in-person robot interactions. To this end, a within-subject in-person study ( $$N=31$$N = 31 ) was performed where participants were instructed to engage in open conversation with the social robot Pepper during two 2.5 min sessions. The robot was equipped with a custom dialogue system based on the GPT-3 large language model, allowing autonomous responses to verbal input. Participants’ affective changes towards the robot were assessed using three questionnaires, NARS, RAS, commonly used in HRI studies, and Closeness, based on the IOS scale. In addition to the three standard questionnaires, a custom question was administered to capture participants’ views on robot capabilities. All measures were collected three times, before the interaction with the robot, after the first interaction with the robot, and after the second interaction with the robot. Results revealed that participants to large degrees stayed with the expectations they had coming into the study, and in contrast to our hypothesis, none of the measured scales moved towards a common mean. Moreover, previous experience with robots was revealed to be a major factor of how participants experienced the robot in the study. These results could be interpreted as implying that expectations of robots are to large degrees decided before interactions with the robot, and that these expectations do not necessarily change as a result of the interaction. Results reveal a strong connection to how expectations are studied in social psychology and human-human interaction, underpinning its relevance for HRI research.

In just a few months, California has moved from extreme drought to dangerous flooding, thanks to atmospheric rivers: long, narrow ribbons of water vapor in the sky. Just a few hundred kilometers wide, atmospheric rivers stretch thousands of kilometers from the tropical oceans toward the poles, carrying up to 20 times as much water as the Mississippi River. That moisture gets tugged along by the windy paddle wheels of spinning storms ahead of its path. When the atmospheric rivers make landfall and the vapor condenses, they can release a staggering amount of rain and snow. Scientists are now working to unravel their physics so that they can provide better forecasts, both now and in a future, hotter world. For dry, midlatitude regions like California, any changes could have a profound impact.

The use of social robots in many sectors of society is predicted to progressively increase. Therefore, exploring how expectations play a role in and change users’ experiences when interacting with these robots over time is necessary. From an interpretative and insight-driven approach, our aim was to explore how humans experience in-person interactions with the social robot Pepper, which was equipped with the OpenAI GPT-3 language model. Qualitative data from 62 video recordings of the interactions with Pepper and post-test interviews were collected from 31 participants. An experiential reflexive thematic analysis was applied. The main findings include various levels of interaction quality, different interaction strategies, and elements influencing the users’ expectations and experiences, which were synthesized into a coherent framework. It appears that the participants adapted their interaction strategies based on their expectations and the perceived capability of the robot, which influenced their experiences. This reveals that positive user experience is not solely determined by interaction quality, showing the interplay among these aspects when interacting with a social robot. To conclude, our findings underscore the intricate nature of the role of user expectations and experiences in social human–robot interaction. The work adds complementary qualitative approaches to the Human–Robot Interaction community to provide additional insights on interacting with social robots.