Francisco Mery Munoz

Dr. Francisco Mery Munoz

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2021 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FMFrancisco Mery Munoz
Francisco Mery Munoz
FAFrancisco Aranda
Francisco Aranda
CMCarolina Méndez-Orellana
Carolina Méndez-Orellana
ICIván Caro
Iván Caro
JPJosé Pesenti
José Pesenti
IGIsabelle M. Germano
Isabelle M. Germano

1 May 2021 in Revista médica de Chile
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMCarolina Méndez-Orellana
Carolina Méndez-Orellana
LALeonardo Arraño-Carrasco
Leonardo Arraño-Carrasco
BCBárbara Cortés-Rivera
Bárbara Cortés-Rivera
KSKarina Sandoval-León
Karina Sandoval-León
JLJosé Lorenzoni-Santos
José Lorenzoni-Santos
FMFrancisco Mery Munoz
Francisco Mery Munoz
La RMf presenta algunos desafíos para ser un método confiable en la práctica clínica. Uno de estos es el efecto de la lesión en la señal hemodinámica BOLD ( Blood-Oxygen-Level-Dependent-imaging ) en áreas elocuentes3 , 4 . La activación cerebro-cerebelar cruzada (CCC) es un patrón de activación reportado en tareas de fluidez verbal (FV) en voluntarios sanos y pacientes con tumores cerebrales 5 , 6 . Esta activación es considerada como una herramienta diagnóstica que contribuye a determinar la lateralización del lenguaje, enfocándose en la activación cerebelar contralateral a la activación supratentorial, cuya señal BOLD no se ve interferida por la lesión tumoral7 .

1 August 2021 in Data in Brief
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FMFrancisco Mery Munoz
Francisco Mery Munoz
CMCarolina Méndez-Orellana
Carolina Méndez-Orellana
JTJavier Torres
Javier Torres
FAFrancisco Aranda
Francisco Aranda
ICIván Caro
Iván Caro
IGIsabelle Germano
Isabelle Germano
Aneurysm clipping requires the proficiency of several skills, yet the traditional way of practicing them has been recently challenged. The use of simulators could be an alternative educational tool. The aim of this data analysis is to provide further evaluation of a reusable low-cost 3D printed training model we developed for aneurysm clipping [1]. The simulator was designed to replicate the bone structure, arteries and targeted aneurysms. Thirty-two neurosurgery residents performed a craniotomy and aneurysm clipping using the model and then filled out a survey. The survey was designed in two parts: a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire and three questions requiring written responses [1]. Two dimensions of the model were evaluated by the questionnaire: the face validity, assessed by 5 questions about the realism of the model, and the content validity, assessed by 6 questions regarding the usefulness of the model during the different steps of the training procedure. The three questions requiring written responses referred to the strengths and weaknesses of the simulator and a global yes/no question as to whether or not they would repeat the experience. Demographic data, experience level and survey responses of the residents were grouped in a dataset [2].

24 September 2024 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DSDaniel Solomons
Daniel Solomons
Maria Rodriguez-FernandezMaria Rodriguez-Fernandez
Maria Rodriguez-Fernandez
FMFrancisco Mery Munoz
Francisco Mery Munoz
LALeonardo Arraño-Carrasco
Leonardo Arraño-Carrasco
FCFrancisco Sahli Costabal
Francisco Sahli Costabal
COCarolina Patricia Mendez Orellana
Carolina Patricia Mendez Orellana
Background/Objectives: Functional MRI (fMRI) is widely used to assess language lateralization, but its application in patients with brain tumors can be hindered by cognitive impairments, compensatory neuroplasticity, and artifacts due to patient movement or severe aphasia. Gray matter volume (GMV) analysis via voxel-based morphometry (VBM) in language-related brain regions may offer a stable complementary approach. This study investigates the relationship between GMV and fMRI-derived language lateralization in healthy individuals and patients with left-hemisphere brain tumors, aiming to enhance accuracy in complex cases. Methods: The MRI data from 22 healthy participants and 28 individuals with left-hemisphere brain tumors were analyzed. Structural T1-weighted and functional images were obtained during three language tasks. Language lateralization was assessed based on activation in predefined regions of interest (ROIs), categorized as typical (left) or atypical (right or bilateral). The GMV in these ROIs was measured using VBM. Linear regressions explored GMV-lateralization associations, and logistic regressions predicted the lateralization based on the GMV. Results: In the healthy participants, typical left-hemispheric language dominance correlated with higher GMV in the left pars opercularis of the inferior frontal gyrus. The brain tumor participants with atypical lateralization showed increased GMV in six right-hemisphere ROIs. The GMV in the language ROIs predicted the fMRI language lateralization, with AUCs from 80.1% to 94.2% in the healthy participants and 78.3% to 92.6% in the tumor patients. Conclusions: GMV analysis in language-related ROIs effectively complements fMRI for assessing language dominance, particularly when fMRI is challenging. It correlates with language lateralization in both healthy individuals and brain tumor patients, highlighting its potential in preoperative language mapping. Further research with larger samples is needed to refine its clinical utility.