We investigated the effect of chronic grape seed extract (GSE) on blood pressure and aortic stiffness (AoS) among overweight and obese males. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (Q), total vascular conductance (TVC), and AoS were measured during two submaximal cycling exercises (40% and 60% VO_2max), after 7 consecutive days of GSE or placebo (PL) ingestion with one week washout period. Compared with PL, GSE supplementation significantly decreased MAP at rest (85 ± 3 mmHg vs. 82 ± 3 mmHg), 40% (102 ± 3 mmHg vs. 99 ± 3 mmHg), and 60% workloads (109 ± 3 mmHg vs. 107 ± 3 mmHg) (P = 0.001, ES = 0.2). AoS was significantly reduced (13.0 ± 1.9 AU vs. 10.2 ± 1.0 AU) at rest (P = 0.002, ES = 0.6). Q was decreased at rest and across all workloads, but there were no significant differences (7.5 ± 0.4 L/min vs. 7.1 ± 0.4 L/min; 20.4 ± 1.2 L/min vs. 19.6 ± 0.9 L/min; 26.3 ± 1.1 L/min vs. 25.5 ± 1.6 L/min, respectively). GSE had no effect on HR, TVC, and SV. Our study indicates that chronic supplementation with GSE reduces arterial pressure at rest and during exercise primarily via the substantial reduction in AoS. Thus, GSE can be a dietary supplement to treat augmented blood pressure responses in obese and overweight males at rest and during exercise.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04465110.

Recently, it has been reported that dietary supplementation with grape seed extract (GSE) ameliorates endothelial function and increase nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability. Thus, we investigated if elevated blood pressure and aortic stiffness (AoS) characterized in obese individuals are attenuated following acute GSE supplementation. Twenty men (obese=10; normal body weight (NBW)=10) participated in this study. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), total peripheral resistance (TPR), and AoS were compared 2 h after ingestion of GSE or placebo (PL) on different days, 1 wk apart. Compared with the PL, GSE supplementation significantly decreased SBP (NBW: 103±4 vs. 99±3 mmHg; obese: 118±3 vs. 112±5 mmHg) and MAP (NBW: 75±2 vs. 72±2 mmHg; obese: 86±3 vs. 84±3 mmHg) in both groups, while there were no differences in HR, SV, DBP, TPR, and AoS. GSE supplementation significantly decreased CO in only obese group. In NBW group, TPR tended to be decreased, but there was no significant difference. Our study suggests that acute supplementation with GSE reduced both SBP and MAP via a reduction in CO in obese individuals and decreased peripheral vasoconstriction in NBW group.

While postexercise hypotension is associated with histamine H₁ and H₂ receptor-mediated postexercise vasodilation, effects of histaminergic vasodilation on blood pressure (BP) in response to dynamic exercise are not known. Thus, in 20 recreationally active male participants (10 normotensive and 10 with high-normal BP) we examined the effects of histamine H₁ and H₂ receptor blockade on cardiac output (CO), mean atrial pressure (MAP), aortic stiffness (AoStiff), and total vascular conductance (TVC) at rest and during progressive cycling exercise. Compared with the normotensive group, MAP, CO, and AoStiff were higher in the high-normal group before and after the blockade at rest, while TVC was similar. At the 40% workload, the blockade significantly increased MAP in both groups, while no difference was found in the TVC. CO was higher in the high-normal group than the normotensive group in both conditions. At the 60% workload, the blockade substantially increased MAP and decreased TVC in the normotensive group, while there were no changes in the high-normal group. A similar CO response pattern was observed at the 60% workload. These findings suggest that the mechanism eliciting an exaggerated BP response to exercise in the high-normal group may be partially due to the inability of histamine receptors. Novelty Males with high-normal BP had an exaggerated BP response to exercise. The overactive BP response is known due to an increase in peripheral vasoconstriction. Increase in peripheral vasoconstriction is partially due to inability of histamine receptors.

Grape seed extract (GSE) or L-citrulline supplement has been known to increase nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability and enhance endothelial-mediated vasodilation. Accordingly, to examine the additive benefits of combination of the two supplementations on hemodynamic responses to dynamic exercise, young, healthy males were recruited for this study. Effects of 7 days of 1) GSE + L-citrulline, 2) GSE, 3) L-citrulline, and 4) placebo supplementation on systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), cardiac output, total vascular conductance (TVC), and oxygen (O₂) consumption were examined at rest and during cycling exercise. Compared with placebo, GSE, L-citrulline, and combined supplementations did not reduce SBP, DBP, and MAP, while cardiac output (placebo; 23.6 ± 1.3 L/min, GSE; 25.7 ± 1.1 L/min; L-citrulline, 25.2 ± 1.2 L/min; GSE + L-citrulline; 25.3 ± 0.9 L/min) and TVC (placebo; 234.7 ± 11.3 ml/min/mmHg, GSE; 258.3 ± 10.6 ml/min/mmHg; L-citrulline, 255.2 ± 10.6 ml/min/mmHg; GSE + L-citrulline; 260.4 ± 8.9 ml/min/mmHg) were increased at only the 80% workload (p < 0.05). Compared with placebo and L-citrulline, GSE and combined supplementations had a reduction in VO₂ across workloads (p < 0.05). However, there was no additive benefits on these variables. We conclude that supplementation with GSE, L-citrulline, and combined supplementations increased cardiac output due partially to decreased vascular resistance. Our findings suggest that GSE may act as an ergogenic aid that can improve O₂ delivery to exercising muscles.

We tested hypothesis that aerobic exercise with blood flow restriction (BFR) induced postexercise hypotension (PEH), and the reduction in blood pressure (BP) was due to peripheral vasodilation via the histamine receptors. Ten male subjects participated in this study. The subjects were randomly assigned to walk for 10 min at 6.4 km/h, 0% grade with or without BFR after taking histamine receptor blockade. Following exercise, BP was measured at 10 min interval for 60 min. Heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and total peripheral resistance (TPR) were evaluated. Our results indicated that MAP was significantly lowered immediately after exercise at 20 min, 30 min, and 40 min before the blockade as opposed to after the blockade. A significant reduction in diastolic BP (DBP) occurred. There were no significant differences in HR, SV, CO, and TPR between before the blockade and after the blockade. MAP was substantially decreased at 20 min, 30 min, and 40 min before the blockade compared to resting (−3.2 ± 2.2, −3.3 ± 2.8, and −2.9 ± 2.5, respectively) while increasing MAP after the blockade. The current study demonstrated that low-intensity aerobic exercise with BFR lowered MAP via histamine receptor-induced peripheral vasodilation. In conclusion, BFR exercise training using short periods and low intensity would be greatly beneficial as a potential treatment to lower BP.

Backgrounds: Evidence indicated that an increase in nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability via dietary supplementation decreased sympathetic output. Grape seed extract (GSE) supplement has been known to increase NO production and improve endothelial function in individuals with elevated and stage 1 hypertension (ES1H), but no studies have assessed the effects of this extract on autonomic balance. Accordingly, the aim of the study was to investigate the effect of 7 days of dietary GSE supplementation on cardiac autonomic and hemodynamic responses. Methods: Ten males were recruited in this study. Each subject received GSE or placebo supplementation with a 1‐week wash‐out period. In a double‐blinded, cross‐over design, hemodynamic responses (heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean atrial pressure (MAP)), heart rate variability (HRV), and cold pressor test (CPT) were compared before and after either GSE or placebo supplementation. Results: Our results indicated that GSE decreased resting DBP (75 ± 2 vs. 71 ± 3) and MAP (91 ± 2 vs. 88 ± 3) compared to the placebo (DBP:71 ± 3 vs. 74 ± 3; MAP: 89 ± 2 vs. 90 ± 2). However, MAP responses to CPT had no difference between post‐PL and post‐GSE supplementation when expressed as absolute increases (PL, Δ10.3 ± 1 mmHg, GSE, Δ9.1 ± 1 mmHg). There were no differences on the HR, SV, CO, SBP, and HRV between placebo and GSE treatments. Conclusions: Our study suggests that GSE can be used as a dietary nutraceutical capable of reducing blood pressure and the risk of ES1H development. The reduction of blood pressure occurs via peripheral vasodilation, not associated with cardiac autonomic reactivity.