Background: this pilot study aimed at determining whether the application of a novel new method of generating pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF), the Fracture Healing Patch (FHP), accelerates the healing of acute distal radius fractures (DRF) when compared to a sham treatment. Methods: 41 patients with DRFs treated with cast immobilization were included. Patients were allocated to a PEMF group (n = 20) or a control (sham) group (n = 21). All patients were assessed with regard to functional and radiological outcomes (X-rays and CT scans) at 2, 4, 6 and 12 weeks. Results: fractures treated with active PEMF demonstrated significantly higher extent of union at 4 weeks as assessed by CT (76% vs. 58%, p = 0.02). SF12 mean physical score was significantly higher in PEMF treated group (47 vs. 36, p = 0.005). Time to cast removal was significantly shorter in PEMF treated patients, 33 ± 5.9 days in PEMF vs. 39.8 ± 7.4 days in sham group (p = 0.002). Conclusion: early addition of PEMF treatment may accelerate bone healing which could lead to a shorter cast immobilization, thus allowing an earlier return to daily life activities and work. There were no complications related to the PEMF device (FHP).

Introduction: Mason Type 3 radial-head fractures are typically treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or radial-head arthroplasty (RHA). Prosthetic options include traditional monobloc implants and newer modular implants designed to match patient anatomy. While short- and medium-term outcomes of metallic RHA are generally favorable, this study aims to compare the long-term outcomes of patients treated with monobloc versus modular implants. Methods: The medical records of all the patients who underwent RHA at a level I trauma center between 2000 and 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who were available for follow-up were invited for reassessment, which included physical examination, questionnaires for the assessment of elbow pain and function, and follow-up radiographs. Results: Out of 35 patients who had RHA, 13 (37%) had a monobloc prosthesis and 22 (63%) had a modular prosthesis. Out of the patients that could be traced, 4 patients from the monobloc group and 10 patients from the modular group agreed to participate in the study. The mean follow-up time was 15 years in the monobloc group and 12.4 years in the modular group. Patients in the modular group demonstrated superior functional outcomes compared to the monobloc group, with statistically significant improvements in MEPS and DASH scores and a non-significant trend towards better ASES scores and VAS scores. Physical examination revealed a decline in function in the operated arm for both groups, with statistically significant differences favoring the modular group in elbow flexion and extension. Radiographic analysis showed varying degrees of implant loosening, with the modular group exhibiting less loosening compared to the monobloc group. Mild degenerative changes and heterotopic ossification were also observed, predominantly in the modular group. Conclusions: The results suggest that modular implants offer superior functional outcomes compared to monobloc implants. The modular group showed statistically significant improvements in elbow flexion and extension. These findings indicate that modular implants may be a more favorable option for enhancing patient outcomes. Further research with larger sample sizes is recommended to confirm these trends and to better understand the long-term benefits of modular implants.

Purpose: Although open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) by plating are the treatment of choice for diaphyseal fractures of the forearm, delayed union and non-union remain as existing complications. This study aimed to analyze predictive factors for the union time in diaphyseal fractures of the forearm. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on all adult patients with diaphyseal forearm fractures who underwent surgical treatment with plate fixation between 2007 and 2016 at a tertiary care referral center. The patients were divided into two groups based on their union times: ≤3 months or >3 months. They were then compared for demographics, fracture pattern and characteristics, associated injuries, type of fixation, and quality of postoperative reduction. Results: Eighty-six diaphyseal forearm bone fractures (radius, ulna, or both) were observed in 55 adults. Out of these fractures, 55 (65.1%) achieved union within ≤3 months, 26 (30.3%) took more than 3 months to achieve union, and 4 (4.6%) resulted in nonunion. The use of a locking plate in open reduction and internal fixation of diaphyseal forearm fractures significantly increased the likelihood of union within ≤3 months (p = 0.043). The parameter of gap width at the fracture site, as observed on postoperative X-rays, showed a qualitative and quantitative correlation with union time (p = 0.028). Conclusion: The use of a locking plate, combined with reducing the gap width at the fracture site after reduction during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of diaphyseal forearm fractures, is significantly correlated with an increased likelihood of achieving bone union within 3 months.

Background: The timing of operative debridement for open upper extremity fractures has not been consistently shown to impact infection rates. Nevertheless, current treatment protocols continue to advocate for prompt surgical debridement in the operating room. We hypothesized that delaying the surgical treatment of low-grade open forearm fractures beyond 24 h from presentation does not increase the likelihood of infection. Methods: The medical charts of patients who presented to a level one trauma center with Gustilo type 1 or 2 open forearm fractures between 2017 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment protocols for these low-grade open fractures included prompt wound irrigation in the emergency department and intravenous antibiotic treatment for 72 h, without emphasizing the timing of surgical intervention. Outcome measures included time to surgery, infection rate, and union rate. Results: The mean ± standard deviation age of the 62-patient cohort was 57 ± 20 years, and 30 (48%) were males. There were 9 proximal third, 16 midshaft, and 37 distal third fractures, of which 41 involved both bones. Forty-eight fractures were classified as Gustilo type 1 and fourteen as Gustilo type 2. Surgery was performed at a median interval of 47 h following presentation, with 43 (69%) patients undergoing surgery later than 24 h following presentation. There was one case (1.6%) of infection and three cases (4.8%) of non-union. Conclusions: Subject to small numbers, our findings suggest that in patients without risk factors, surgical treatment for low-grade open forearm fractures can be safely deferred without an apparent increase in infection rates. Accordingly, treatment protocols for these fractures may prioritize prompt and adequate antibiotic administration over the urgency of surgical intervention.