Splicing is the most frequently altered biological process by mutations within gene regions. Information for splicing is recognized by several factors that bind pre-mRNA sequence and, through coordinated interaction, yield mature transcripts. Some in silico methods have been developed to predict if a mutation leads to aberrant splicing patterns. We previously created SpliceAid tool that is able to minimize false positive predictions because it adopts strictly experimental RNA target motifs bound by splicing proteins in humans. In order to improve prediction accuracy and better understand the splicing outcome, the tissue specificity of each splicing regulatory factor has to be taken into account. Here, we have developed SpliceAid 2 by adding the expression data related to the splicing factors extracted from the main proteomic and transcriptomic databases, true 5′ and 3′ splice sites, polypyrimidine tracts, and branch point sequences. The new version collects 2,220 target sites of 62 human splicing proteins and their expression data in 320 tissues per cell. SpliceAid 2 can be useful to foresee the splicing pattern alteration, to guide the identification of the molecular effect due to the mutations and to understand the tissue-specific alternative splicing. SpliceAid 2 is freely accessible at www.introni.it/spliceaid.html. Hum Mutat 33:81–85, 2012.

A comprehensive knowledge of all the factors involved in splicing, both proteins and RNAs, and of their interaction network is crucial for reaching a better understanding of this process and its functions. A large part of relevant information is buried in the literature or collected in various different databases. By hand-curated screenings of literature and databases, we retrieved experimentally validated data on 71 human RNA-binding splicing regulatory proteins and organized them into a database called ‘SpliceAid-F’ (http://www.caspur.it/SpliceAidF/). For each splicing factor (SF), the database reports its functional domains, its protein and chemical interactors and its expression data. Furthermore, we collected experimentally validated RNA–SF interactions, including relevant information on the RNA-binding sites, such as the genes where these sites lie, their genomic coordinates, the splicing effects, the experimental procedures used, as well as the corresponding bibliographic references. We also collected information from experiments showing no RNA–SF binding, at least in the assayed conditions. In total, SpliceAid-F contains 4227 interactions, 2590 RNA-binding sites and 1141 ‘no-binding’ sites, including information on cellular contexts and conditions where binding was tested. The data collected in SpliceAid-F can provide significant information to explain an observed splicing pattern as well as the effect of mutations in functional regulatory elements.

Summary: The correct post-transcriptional RNA processing is finely regulated by RNA-binding proteins. Unfortunately, there is little experimental information on target RNA sequences of RNA-binding proteins and moreover such experimentally derived target sequences are annotated in a compact form by the score matrices that overestimate the number of possible recognized sequences. We carried out an exhaustive hand curated literature search to create a database, SpliceAid, collecting all the experimentally assessed target RNA sequences that are bound by splicing proteins in humans. We built a web resource, database driven, to easy query SpliceAid and give back the results by an accurate and dynamic graphic representation. Availability: SpliceAid database is freely accessible at http://www.introni.it/splicing.html Contact:f.piva@univpm.it

High mortality and low survival rates for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) mainly result from the delay in diagnosis and treatment. Therefore there is an urgent need to identify early PDAC biomarkers and new therapeutic targets. In this study, we applied a commonly used systems biology approach, the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), on lncRNA expression data. Eleven lncRNAs, namely A2M-AS1, DLEU2, LINC01133, LINC00675, MIR155HG, SLC25A25-AS1, LINC01857, LOC642852 (LINC00205), ITGB2-AS1, TSPOAP1-AS1 and PSMB8-AS1 have been identified and validated on an independent PDAC expression dataset. Furthermore, we characterised them by functional and pathway enrichment analysis and identified which lncRNAs showed differential expression, differential promoter methylation levels and copy number alterations between normal and PDAC samples. Finally, we also performed a survival analysis and identified A2M-AS1, LINC01133, LINC00205 and TSPOAP1-AS1 as prognostic biomarkers for PDAC. Interestingly, although only a few cancer-associated lncRNAs have been functionally characterized, LINC00675 and LINC01133 lncRNAs have been already demonstrated to be involved in PDAC development and progression. Therefore, our results provide new potential diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for PDAC that deserve to be further investigated. Moreover, these lncRNAs may improve the understanding about molecular pathogenesis of PDAC.