Anderson-Fabry disease (FD) is a rare, progressive, multisystem storage disorder caused by the partial or total deficit of the lysosomal enzyme α-galactosidase A (α-Gal A). It is an X-linked, lysosomal enzymopathy due to mutations in the galactosidase alpha gene (GLA), encoding the α-Gal A. To date, more than 900 mutations in this gene have been described. In our laboratories, the study of genetic and enzymatic alterations related to FD was performed in about 17,000 subjects with a symptomatology referable to this disorder. The accumulation of globotriaosylsphingosine (LysoGb3) was determined in blood of positives. Exonic mutations in the GLA gene were detected in 471 patients (207 Probands and 264 relatives): 71.6% of mutations were associated with the classic phenotype, 19.8% were associated with the late-onset phenotype, and 8.6% of genetic variants were of unknown significance (GVUS). The accumulation of LysoGb3 was found in all male patients with a mutation responsible for classic or late-onset FD. LysoGb3 levels were consistent with the type of mutations and the symptomatology of patients. α-Gal A activity in these patients is absent or dramatically reduced. In recent years, confusion about the pathogenicity of some mutations led to an association between non-causative mutations and FD. Our study shows that the identification of FD patients is possible by associating clinical history, GLA gene analysis, α-Gal A assay, and blood accumulation of LysoGB3. In our experience, LysoGB3 can be considered a reliable marker, which is very useful to confirm the diagnosis of Fabry disease.

Two disease severity scoring systems, the Mainz Severity Score Index (MSSI) and Fabry Disease Severity Scoring System (DS3), have been validated for quantifying the disease burden of Fabry disease. We aimed to develop a dynamic mathematical model [the FASTEX (FAbry STabilization indEX)] to assess the clinical stability. A multidisciplinary panel of experts in Fabry disease first defined a novel score of severity [raw score (RS)] based on three domains with a small number items in each domain (nervous system domain: pain, cerebrovascular events; renal domain: proteinuria, glomerular filtration rate; cardiac domain: echocardiography parameters, electrocardiograph parameters and New York Heart Association class) and evaluated the clinical stability over time. The RS was tested in 28 patients (15 males, 13 females) with the classic form of Fabry disease. There was good statistical correlation between the newly established RS and a weighted score (WS), with DS3 and MSSI (R² = 0.914, 0.949, 0.910 and 0.938, respectively). In order to refine the RS further, a WS, which was expressed as a percentage value, was calculated. This was based on the relative clinical significance of each item within the domain with the panel agreeing on the attribution of a different weight of clinical damage to a specific organ system. To test the variation of the clinical burden over time, the RS was repeated after 1 year. The panel agreed on a cut-off of a 20% change from baseline as the clinical WS to define clinical stability. The FASTEX model showed good correlation with the clinical assessment and with clinical variation over time in all patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The pulvinar sign refers to exclusive T1WI hyperintensity of the lateral pulvinar. Long considered a common sign of Fabry disease, the pulvinar sign has been reported in many pathologic conditions. The exact incidence of the pulvinar sign has never been tested in representative cohorts of patients with Fabry disease. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of the pulvinar sign in Fabry disease by analyzing T1WI in a large Fabry disease cohort, determining whether relaxometry changes could be detected in this region independent of the pulvinar sign positivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed brain MR imaging of 133 patients with Fabry disease recruited through specialized care clinics. A subgroup of 26 patients underwent a scan including 2 FLASH sequences for relaxometry that were compared with MRI scans of 34 healthy controls. RESULTS: The pulvinar sign was detected in 4 of 133 patients with Fabry disease (3.0%). These 4 subjects were all adult men (4 of 53, 7.5% of the entire male population) with renal failure and under enzyme replacement therapy. When we tested for discrepancies between Fabry disease and healthy controls in quantitative susceptibility mapping and relaxometry maps, no significant difference emerged for any of the tested variables. CONCLUSIONS: The pulvinar sign has a significantly lower incidence in Fabry disease than previously described. This finding, coupled with a lack of significant differences in quantitative MR imaging, allows hypothesizing that selective involvement of the pulvinar is a rare neuroradiologic sign of Fabry disease.

The FAbry STabilization indEX (FASTEX) is an innovative index allowing the assessment of clinical stability over time in Fabry disease patients. This index was developed in a population of 28 male patients with the classical form of Fabry disease. The aim of the study was to test the accuracy of the FASTEX in evaluating Fabry disease stability in 132 male and female patients with classical and non-classical Fabry disease from nine Italian centres and it also aimed to define the sensitivity and specificity of this new tool. In particular, we aimed to investigate the correlation between the FASTEX and clinical judgement in a large-scale cohort of the study population. Statistical methods applied to this investigation included the calculation of accuracy, specificity and sensitivity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Cohen’s κ index related to the FASTEX and clinical judgement. The patient population included 58 males (43.9%). The mean age of the overall population was 46.3 ± 15. 1 years (range 31.2–61.4). The median interval between the two multidisciplinary evaluations used for FASTEX calculation was 398 days. Since no gold standard method is available to define the overall clinical condition of Fabry patients over time, the results of the FASTEX were compared with clinical judgements given by the physicians involved in this study. In this way, the FASTEX classified 121 of 132 (92%) patients correctly. In particular, the FASTEX correctly identified 93% (41/44) of clinically ‘unstable’ and 91% (80/88) of clinically ‘stable’ patients. The area under the curve of the ROC related to the FASTEX index cut-off (20) was equal to 0.967, very close to its theoretical maximum (1), which means that it is an excellent test for classifying patients as ‘stable’ or ‘unstable’ compared with clinical judgement. In addition, the FASTEX cut-off >20 provides the most acceptable balance between sensitivity and specificity. The Cohen’s κ index value obtained in our study was 0.82, showing a highly statistically significant P-value < 0.01 related to the agreement between the FASTEX and clinical judgement. The FASTEX is demonstrated here to be a specific and sensitive tool. When applied to a large cohort of Fabry patients, it was shown to be a valid instrument in helping physicians to discriminate objectively the clinical stability of individual Fabry patients.

Fabry disease (FD) is a rare lysosomal storage disorder that is characterized by renal, neurological, and cardiovascular dysfunction. Four treatments are currently available for patients with FD; three enzyme replacement therapies (ERTs; agalsidase alfa, agalsidase beta, and pegunigalsidase alfa) and one pharmacological chaperone (migalastat). This review focuses on the evidence for the benefits of ERTs and migalastat, and provides an overview of their impact on disease manifestations and quality of life (QoL). Agalsidase beta is associated with renal, neurological, and cardiovascular benefits, and may prevent renal disease progression. Agalsidase alfa provides stabilizing effects across all main organ systems, although minor sex-specific differences exist in patients with more advanced baseline disease. The benefits of agalsidase alfa and agalsidase beta are similar but depend on the extent of baseline disease. Some data indicate that agalsidase beta may be preferable over the longer term. Both agalsidase alfa and agalsidase beta are associated with improved gastrointestinal and pain symptoms, as well as improved QoL. Patients with advanced end-organ damage tend not to respond as optimally to ERTs as those who initiate ERTs before irreversible organ fibrosis develops, highlighting the need for early treatment initiation. Migalastat, which is only approved for patients with amenable missense gene variants, generally stabilizes renal parameters and provides cardiovascular benefits. Migalastat also improves diarrhea and pain, and stabilizes QoL (although ERT may be more effective for pain management), but the neurological effects of migalastat have not been studied. Real-world data raise concerns about effective in vivo amenability of some genetic variants. Future studies with direct treatment comparisons in patients with FD are needed.