Gareth J. Treharne

Prof. Gareth J. Treharne

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 March 2019 in Journal of Homosexuality
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KTKyle Kar Hou Tan
Kyle Kar Hou Tan
GTGareth J. Treharne
Gareth J. Treharne
SESonja J Ellis
Sonja J Ellis
JSJohanna M. Schmidt
Johanna M. Schmidt
JVJaimie F. Veale
Jaimie F. Veale
Past studies that compare cisgender to transgender (or trans) and gender diverse people have found a higher prevalence of mental health problems among the latter groups. This article uses Testa’s gender minority stress framework, which is an expansion of minority stress theory, to assess minority stressors that are specific to the experiences of trans and gender diverse people. The concept of cisnormativity, an ideology that positions cisgender identities as a norm, is used in relation to the gender minority stress framework to describe the marginalizing nature of social environments for trans and gender diverse people. This article provides a critical review that integrates and expands on past theoretical perspectives on gender minority stressors and protective factors. Specifically, this article demonstrates the relevance of cultural and ethnic backgrounds to complement the application of intersectionality in research on health disparities experienced by trans and gender diverse people.

4 April 2008 in Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VPV. F. Panoulas
V. F. Panoulas
GMG. S. Metsios
G. S. Metsios
APA. V. Pace
A. V. Pace
HJH. John
H. John
GTGareth J. Treharne
Gareth J. Treharne
GKG. D. Kitas
G. D. Kitas
RA associates with an increased burden of cardiovascular disease, which is at least partially attributed to classical risk factors such as hypertension (HT) and dyslipidaemia. HT is highly prevalent, and seems to be under-diagnosed and under-treated among patients with RA. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms that may lead to increased blood pressure in such patients, paying particular attention to commonly used drugs for the treatment of RA. We also suggest screening strategies and management algorithms for HT, specific to the RA population, although it is clear that these need to be formally assessed in prospective randomized controlled trials designed specifically for the purpose, which, unfortunately, are currently lacking.

28 November 2007 in Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GMG. S. Metsios
G. S. Metsios
Antonios Stavropoulos KalinoglouAntonios Stavropoulos Kalinoglou
Antonios Stavropoulos Kalinoglou
JZJ. J. C. S. Veldhuijzen van Zanten
J. J. C. S. Veldhuijzen van Zanten
GTGareth J. Treharne
Gareth J. Treharne
VPV. F. Panoulas
V. F. Panoulas
GKG. D. Kitas
G. D. Kitas
This systematic review investigates the effectiveness of exercise interventions in improving disease-related characteristics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It also provides suggestions for exercise programmes suitable for improving the cardiovascular profile of RA patients and proposes areas for future research in the field. Six databases (Medline, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Google Scholar, EMBASE and PEDro) were searched to identify publications from 1974 to December 2006 regarding RA and exercise interventions. The quality of the studies included was determined by using the Jadad scale. Initial searches identified 1342 articles from which 40 met the inclusion criteria. No studies were found investigating exercise interventions in relation to cardiovascular disease in RA. There is strong evidence suggesting that exercise from low to high intensity of various modes is effective in improving disease-related characteristics and functional ability in RA patients. Future studies are required to investigate the effects of exercise in improving the cardiovascular status of this patient population.

27 March 2007 in Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EHE. D. Hale
E. D. Hale
GTGareth J. Treharne
Gareth J. Treharne
GKG. D. Kitas
G. D. Kitas
As Hill et al. point out in their powerful paper [1], there is often a difference between objective clinical and radiographic evidence of musculoskeletal disease activity or severity and the experience of pain, other symptoms and functional ability reported by the patient. For the patient, the greatest impact of the disease lies in the effect it has on their ability to continue with a ‘normal’ daily life and this will necessarily be their focus of interest. It is, however, increasingly important for us as researchers and healthcare professionals to understand how the perceptions, experience and impact of having a musculoskeletal condition might influence a patient's interpretation and response to it, so that we, in turn, can respond more appropriately.

1 May 2005 in Journal of Health Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GTGareth J. Treharne
Gareth J. Treharne
GKGeorge D. Kitas
George D. Kitas
ALAntonia C. Lyons
Antonia C. Lyons
DBDavid A. Booth
David A. Booth
This study examined the multivariate relationships of psychosocial factors with well-being in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Fifty-five patients with early RA (< six months), 52 with intermediate RA (one-seven years) and 47 with established RA (> seven years) completed questionnaires on psychosocial factors and psychological and physical well-being. Illness perceptions related to worse depression and life satisfaction (especially in early RA) and to longer morning stiffness (especially in intermediate RA). Optimism related to lower pain in early and intermediate RA. Social support related to lower fatigue in established RA. Indications for interventions targeted by disease duration are discussed.

1 March 2006 in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KDK M J Douglas
K M J Douglas
APA V Pace
A V Pace
GTGareth J. Treharne
Gareth J. Treharne
ASA Saratzis
A Saratzis
PNP Nightingale
P Nightingale
GKG D Kitas
G D Kitas
Background: Cardiovascular mortality is increased in rheumatoid arthritis. Possible reasons include an increased incidence of ischaemic heart disease or worse outcome after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Objectives: To assess the outcome of ACS in rheumatoid arthritis compared with case matched controls in the context of underlying cardiac risk factors, clinical presentation, and subsequent management. Methods: 40 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ACS identified from coronary care admission registers between 1990 and 2000 were case matched as closely as possible for age, sex, classical cardiovascular risk factors, type and severity of ACS, and admission date (±3 months) with 40 controls. A standardised proforma was used for detailed case note review. Results: Age, sex, other cardiovascular risk factors, and type and severity of presenting ACS were not significantly different between cases and controls. Recurrent cardiac events were commoner in rheumatoid arthritis (23/40, 57.5%) than controls (12/40, 30%) (p = 0.013); there were 16/40 deaths in rheumatoid arthritis (40%) v 6/40 (15%) in controls (p = 0.012). Recurrent events occurred earlier in rheumatoid arthritis (log rank survival, p = 0.05). Presentation with chest pain occurred in all controls compared with 33/40 rheumatoid patients (82%) (p = 0.006); collapse occurred in one control (2.5%) v 7/40 rheumatoid patients (17.5%) (p = 0.025). Treatment during the ACS was not significantly different in the two groups. Conclusions: Recurrent ischaemic events and death occur more often after ACS in rheumatoid arthritis. Atypical presentation is commoner in rheumatoid arthritis. There is an urgent need to develop identification and intervention strategies for ACS specific to this high risk group.