Background: Population-level surveillance of the prevalence and trends of basic self-care limitations will help to identify the magnitude of physical disablement in the rapidly growing older American demographic. We sought to evaluate the prevalence and trends of activities of daily living (ADL) limitations in the United States. Methods: The analytic sample included 30,418 Americans aged ≥50 years from the 2006–2018 waves of the Health and Retirement Study. ADLs were self-reported. Weighted prevalence estimates were presented, and trends analyses were performed. Results: Although overall ADL disability prevalence was 16.5% (95% confidence interval: 15.8–17.2) in 2018, there were no changes in limitations during the study period (p = 0.52). Older adults had a greater ADL disability prevalence than middle-aged adults (p < 0.001). While older persons experienced a declining trend of ADL limitations (p < 0.001), middle-aged persons had an increasing trend (p < 0.001). Males had a lower ADL limitation prevalence than females (p < 0.001). Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black had a higher ADL disability prevalence than non-Hispanic White (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This investigation revealed that while the estimated prevalence of ADL limitations in the United States was substantial, changes in such limitations were not observed. Our findings can help guide ADL screening, target sub-populations with an elevated ADL limitation prevalence, and inform interventions.

Background: Handgrip strength (HGS) is strongly recommended for use in clinical settings because it is a convenient assessment of muscle strength and a robust prognostic indicator of health. However, it may lack use in clinical settings, and may not be well understood by healthcare providers and patients. We sought to determine the healthcare provider and patient perceptions of HGS in an internal medicine resident clinic. Methods: Healthcare providers were presented with didactic sessions for HGS and engaged in routine follow-up meetings. HGS was measured on eligible older adult patients during an approximately 9-month phased study period. Both healthcare providers and patients were asked to complete a questionnaire with 10-point Likert scale response items regarding their experiences with HGS. Results were presented as descriptive. Results: Overall, patients had a positive perception of HGS, as they understood HGS instructions (score: 9.8 ± 0.7), their results (score: 9.5 ± 1.3), and found value in HGS for their health (score: 8.4 ± 2.3). However, healthcare providers were generally neutral about HGS, such that at study end HGS was viewed as moderately valuable for their practice (score: 6.0 ± 2.1) and patients (score: 6.0 ± 2.1). Conclusions: Overall, patients had a positive perception of HGS, but healthcare providers were neutral. Our findings should be used to guide HGS for possible implementation and quality management in appropriate healthcare settings.