Introduction, The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current evidence for the effectiveness of ginseng, Rutin and Moringa for treating erectile dysfunction. Methods, A broad search of the Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane and Web of Science databases was performed in complicance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The following criteria were required for articles to be included in the review: English language; observational studies (cohort studies, case control/comparative studies, single-arm studies); randomized controlled trials; non-randomized comparative studies; case series; number of participants: ≥5 for case series or ≥5 patients per group for comparative studies. The Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) assessment tool for RCTs was used to assess the risk of bias of included studies. Results, Seven full-text articles were included in this review. All studies were randomized controlled trials. No studies on Rutin and Moringa alone matched the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the RCTs was variable. In all studies, the group treated with ginseng reported an improvement of erectile function (EF) compared to the control groups. IIEF and IIEF-5 were used to evaluate erectile function in six studies and in four of them, the improvement of the scores in the group treated with ginseng over the control group reached the statistical significance. Conclusion, This review suggests a positive effect of ginseng on EF in men. The association of ginseng along with other nutritional components with potential beneficial effects on ED appears promising and deserves further investigation in large randomized controlled trials.

The management of erectile dysfunction (ED) shows several gray zones, especially in terms of patients’ satisfaction and adherence to the treatment. The main and first-line treatment for ED is drug therapy, mainly phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5is), but adherence to the therapy is not optimal due to the low patient satisfaction reported in several cases. To address this issue, different administration routes and PDE5i pharmacological formulations have been introduced in the pharmacological market. The pharmaceutical market has recently seen the introduction of a novel sildenafil oral suspension. This device offers access to all therapeutic regimens in one device, releasing 0.5 mL of suspension containing 12.5 mg of sildenafil with each pulse. This formulation enables tailored dosing based on clinical requirements and the demands of ED patients. Here, we aim to give a brief narrative review of the management of this new oral suspension in order to provide readers with some suggestions to use in everyday clinical practice, on the basis of recent evidence, by using an easy and rapid-to-consult question and answer form. Also included are the conclusions of a board meeting of experienced andrologists regarding the most recent developments in this area.

Background: The management of erectile dysfunction (ED) shows several grey zones and new treatments are required to reduce the percentage of patients discontinuing treatment. Here, we aim to evaluate the role of a natural mixture named Icarifil® (L-Citrulline, L-Carnitine, Eruca vesicaria, Panax ginseng, Tribulus terrestris, Turnera diffusa, Taurine, Vitamin E, Zinc) in the management of patients with ED. Methods: From September 2022 to March 2023, all patients attending 3 urological institutions due to ED were randomized to receive the following for 3 months: Icarifil® 1 sachet every 24 h (Group 1) or Icarifil® 1 sachet + tadalafil 5 mg 1 tablet every 24 h (Group 2) or tadalafil 5 mg 1 tablet daily (Group 3). All patients underwent urologic visits and dedicated questionnaires (IIEF-5, SEP-2, SEP-3) at enrollment and at the follow-up evaluation (3 months). Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) at the follow-up evaluation were used. The primary endpoint was the difference in the questionnaires at the follow-up visit compared to the one at enrollment among the study groups. Results: In the per-protocol analysis, 52 patients in Group 1, 55 in Group 2 and 57 in Group 3 were analyzed. At the follow-up evaluation, IIEF-5 scores improved in all the 3 groups between enrollment and the follow-up evaluation, but a statistically significant difference was reported between Group 2 (+7.4) and Group 1 (+4.1) or Group 3 (+5.1), (p < 0.001; p < 0.001). Moreover, 47 patients (94.0%) in Group 2 showed an improvement in the SEP questionnaires, when compared with the baseline, while 29 in Group 1 (56.9%) and 42 in Group 3 (82.3%) showed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.004; p = 0.003) among the groups. The PRO analysis reported better efficacy and patient satisfaction in Group 2 when compared with Group 1 or Group 3. Conclusions: In conclusion, Icarifil^® is able to improve penile erectile function in mild–moderate ED and significantly improve the clinical efficacy of daily used tadalafil 5 mg. Icarifil^® could represent an interesting alternative treatment in patients experiencing adverse effects or with contraindications for chronic treatment with PDE5-is.

The management of erectile dysfunction (ED) shows several grey zones, especially in terms of patient satisfaction and adherence to the treatment. The main and first-line treatment for ED is drug therapy, mainly phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE-5is) but the adherence to the therapy is not optimal due to the low patient satisfaction reported in several cases. To address this issue, different administration routes and PDE-5is pharmacological formulations have been introduced in the pharmacological market. The pharmaceutical market has recently seen the introduction of a novel sildenafil oral suspension. This device offers access to all therapeutic regimens in one device, releasing 0.5 mL of suspension containing 12.5 mg of sildenafil with each pulse. This formulation enables tailored dosing based on clinical requirements and the demands of ED patients. Here, we aim to give a brief narrative review of the management of this new oral suspension in order to provide the readers with some suggestions to use in everyday clinical practice, on the basis of the recent evidence, by using an easy and rapid-to-consult questions and answers form. Also included are the conclusions of a board meeting of experienced andrologists regarding the most recent developments in this area.