Jonathan Dinman

Prof. Jonathan Dinman

Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

40Years (1987-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2014 in Current Opinion in Structural Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NBNenad Ban
Nenad Ban
RBRoland Beckmann
Roland Beckmann
JCJamie Hd Cate
Jamie Hd Cate
Jonathan DinmanJonathan Dinman
Jonathan Dinman
FDFrançois Dragon
François Dragon
MYMarat Yusupov
Marat Yusupov

1 January 1991 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jonathan DinmanJonathan Dinman
Jonathan Dinman
TIT Icho
T Icho
RWR B Wickner
R B Wickner
The L-A double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) virus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae has two open reading frames (ORFs). ORF1 encodes the 80-kDa major coat protein (gag). ORF2, which is expressed only as a 180-kDa fusion protein with ORF1, encodes a single-stranded RNA-binding domain and has the consensus sequence for RNA-dependent RNA polymerases of (+)-strand and double-stranded RNA viruses (pol). We show that the 180-kDa protein is formed by -1 ribosomal frame-shifting by a mechanism indistinguishable from that of retro-viruses. Analysis of the "slippery site" suggests that a low probability of unpairing of the aminoacyl-tRNA from the 0-frame codon at the ribosomal A site reduces the efficiency of frameshifting more than the reluctance of a given tRNA to have its wobble base mispaired. Frameshifting of L-A requires a pseudoknot structure just downstream of the shift site. The efficiency of the L-A frameshift site is 1.8%, similar to the observed molar ratio in viral particles of the 180-kDa fusion protein to the major coat protein.

1 November 2011 in Molecular Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KJKaren Jack
Karen Jack
CBCristian Bellodi
Cristian Bellodi
DLDori M. Landry
Dori M. Landry
RNRachel O. Niederer
Rachel O. Niederer
AMArturas Meskauskas
Arturas Meskauskas
Jonathan DinmanJonathan Dinman
Jonathan Dinman

2 April 2018 in Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TDThomas E. Dever
Thomas E. Dever
Jonathan DinmanJonathan Dinman
Jonathan Dinman
RGRachel Green
Rachel Green
In this review, we highlight the current understanding of translation elongation and recoding in eukaryotes. In addition to providing an overview of the process, recent advances in our understanding of the role of the factor eIF5A in both translation elongation and termination are discussed. We also highlight mechanisms of translation recoding with a focus on ribosomal frameshifting during elongation. We see that the balance between the basic steps in elongation and the less common recoding events is determined by the kinetics of the different processes as well as by specific sequence determinants.

24 November 2014 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ADAli Dashti
Ali Dashti
PSPeter Schwander
Peter Schwander
RLRobert Langlois
Robert Langlois
RFRussell Fung
Russell Fung
WLWen Li
Wen Li
AOAbbas Ourmazd
Abbas Ourmazd
Significance: Many functions in the cell are performed by Brownian machines, macromolecular assemblies that use energy from the thermal environment for many of the conformational changes involved in their work cycles. Here we present a new approach capable of mapping the continuous motions of such nanomachines along their trajectories in the free-energy landscape and demonstrate this capability in the context of experimental cryogenic electron microscope snapshots of the ribosome, the nanomachine responsible for protein synthesis in all living organisms. We believe our approach constitutes a universal platform for the analysis of free-energy landscapes and conformational motions of molecular nanomachines and their dependencies on temperature, buffer conditions, and regulatory factors.

19 June 2012 in WIREs RNA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jonathan DinmanJonathan Dinman
Jonathan Dinman
While ribosomes must maintain translational reading frame in order to translate primary genetic information into polypeptides, cis‐acting signals located in mRNAs represent higher order information content that can be used to fine‐tune gene expression. Classes of signals have been identified that direct a fraction of elongating ribosomes to shift reading frame by one base in the 5′ (−1) or 3′ (+1) direction. This is called programmed ribosomal frameshifting (PRF). Although mechanisms of PRF differ, a common feature is induction of ribosome pausing, which alters kinetic partitioning rates between in‐frame and out‐of‐frame codons at specific ‘slippery’ sequences. Many viruses use PRF to ensure synthesis of the correct ratios of virus‐encoded proteins required for proper viral particle assembly and maturation, thus identifying PRF as an attractive target for antiviral therapeutics. In contrast, recent studies indicate that PRF signals may primarily function as mRNA destabilizing elements in cellular mRNAs. These studies suggest that PRF may be used to fine‐tune gene expression through mRNA decay pathways. The possible regulation of PRF by noncoding RNAs is also discussed. WIREs RNA 2012 doi: 10.1002/wrna.1126This article is categorized under: RNA Structure and Dynamics > Influence of RNA Structure in Biological Systems RNA Evolution and Genomics > Computational Analyses of RNA Translation > Translation Regulation