Background/Aims: Immune responses are involved in arterial hypertension. An observational cross-sectional case control study was conducted to estimate the association between Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) expression and interleukin (IL)-17A serum levels in patients with controlled and non-controlled hypertension. Methods: We have enrolled 105 non-complicated otherwise healthy hypertensive patients: 53 with well-controlled blood pressure and 52 non-controlled. TLR4 peripheral monocytes expression and serum IL-17A levels were determined by flow cytometry and ELISA, respectively. Results: Non-controlled patients exhibited higher TLR4 expression than well-controlled (25.60 vs. 21.99, P=0.011). TLR4 expression was lower in well-controlled patients who were prescribed beta blockers (18.9 vs. 22.6, P=0.005) and IL-17A concentration was higher in patients using diuretics in either group (1.41 vs. 2.01 pg/ml, P<0.001; well-controlled 1.3 vs. 1.8 pg/ml, P= 0.023; non-controlled 1.6 vs. 2.3 pg/ml, P=0.001). Correlation between IL-17A concentration and hypertension duration was observed in non-controlled patients (Spearman correlation coefficient . ρ=0.566, P<0.001) whereas in well-controlled patients a correlation was found between hypertension duration and TLR4 expression (ρ=0.322, P=0.020). Conclusions: Arterial hypertension stimulates the immune response regardless of blood pressure regulation status. Prolonged hypertension influences peripheral monocyte TLR4 expression and IL-17A serum levels. Anti-hypertensive drugs have different immunomodulatory effects: diuretics are associated with higher IL-17A concentration and beta-blockers with lower TLR4 expression.

Little is known about how the change from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab in a real-life setting in inflammatory bowel disease patients on stable maintenance therapy affects clinical outcomes. We compared the data on vedolizumab serum trough concentration, efficacy, and safety prior to and six months after the switch from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab. In total, 24 patients, 13 with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 11 with Crohn’s disease (CD), were included. Mean serum trough concentration of intravenous vedolizumab was significantly lower than mean serum trough concentration of subcutaneous vedolizumab (p = 0.002). There was no significant difference between C-reactive protein levels, fecal calprotectin levels or clinical scores (Harvey–Bradshaw index or Partial Mayo score) prior to transition to subcutaneous vedolizumab and after 6 months. In four (16.7%) patients, two CD and two UC, therapy was discontinued during the follow-up period with a median of 5 months (minimum–maximum: 4–6). In all patients, therapy was discontinued due to loss of response. In total, 13 adverse events were reported by 11 patients, and the most common adverse event was COVID-19. No serious adverse events were reported. In conclusion, subcutaneous vedolizumab has shown to be effective and safe in patients on previously established maintenance therapy with intravenous vedolizumab.

Background: One of the major challenges in improving sepsis care is early prediction of sepsis complications. The endocannabinoid system has been intensely studied in recent years; however, little is known about its role in sepsis in humans. This study aimed to assess the prognostic role of endocannabinoids, anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), as early predictors of mortality, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) requirement, and length of stay (LOS) in patients with sepsis. Materials and Methods: In total, 106 patients with confirmed sepsis were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into groups according to mortality outcome (survival, N =53; nonsurvival, N =53), IMV requirement (IMV group, N =26; non-IMV group, N =80), and LOS (LOS <10 days, N =59; LOS ≥10 days, N =47). Patients' clinical status was assessed along with laboratory biomarkers as well as AEA and 2-AG concentration measurements early on admission to emergency units. AEA and 2-AG levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using an ELISA processor, EtiMax 3000 (DiaSorin, Saluggia, Italy). The predictive value of AEA and 2-AG for the studied sepsis outcomes and complications was analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Two endocannabinoids showed no significant difference between survivors and nonsurvivors, although an AEA concentration <7.16 μg/L predicted mortality outcome with a sensitivity of 57% (95% confidence interval [CI] 42–71) and specificity of 80% (95% CI 66–91). AEA concentrations ≤17.84 μg/L predicted LOS ≥10 days with sensitivity of 98% (95% CI 89–100) and specificity of 34% (95% CI 22–47). When analyzing IMV requirement, levels of AEA and 2-AG were significantly lower within the IMV group compared with the non-IMV group (5.94 μg/L [2.04–9.44] and 6.70 μg/L [3.50–27.04], p =0.043, and 5.68 μg/L [2.30–8.60] and 9.58 μg/L [4.83–40.05], p =0.002, respectively). The 2-AG showed the best performance for IMV requirement prediction, with both sensitivity and specificity of 69% ( p <0.001). Endocannabinoid AEA was an independent risk factor of LOS ≥10 days (odds ratio [OR] 23.59; 95% CI 3.03–183.83; p =0.003) and IMV requirement in sepsis (OR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67–0.93; p =0.004). Conclusion: Low AEA concentration is a prognostic factor of hospital LOS longer than 10 days. Lower AEA and 2-AG concentrations obtained at the time of admission to the hospital are predictors of IMV requirement.

Background: Cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, causing endothelial dysfunction (ED) and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), contribute to an increased risk of heart failure (HF). The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the occurrence of LVDD and ED with CV risk assessed by the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation2 (SCORE2) algorithm and HF. Methods: In the period from November 2019 to May 2022, a cross-sectional study that included 178 middle-aged adults was conducted. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was used to assess left ventricular (LV) diastolic and systolic function. ED was assessed using the plasma values of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and was determined using the ELISA method. Results: The majority of subjects with LVDD grades 2 and 3 had high/very high SCORE2, developed HF and all were taking medication (p < 0.001). They also had significantly lowest plasma ADMA values (p < 0.001). We found that the reduction of ADMA concentration is influenced by certain groups of drugs, or more significantly, by their combinations (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In our study, we confirmed a positive correlation between LVDD, HF and SCORE2 severity. The results showed a negative correlation between the biomarkers of ED, LVDD severity, HF, and SCORE2, which we believe is due to medication effects.