BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is an adverse effect of antiresorptive treatment. This study estimated incidence proportions and incidence rates of ONJ in cancer patients with bone metastases from solid tumors treated for the prevention of skeletal‐related events in routine clinical practice.METHODS: This cohort study in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden in 2011‐2018 included 3 treatment cohorts: a denosumab inception cohort (DEIC), a zoledronic acid inception cohort (ZAIC), and a denosumab‐switch cohort (DESC). The authors estimated 1‐ to 5‐year incidence proportions and incidence rates of ONJ overall, by cancer site (breast, prostate, or other solid tumor), and by country. ONJ diagnoses were confirmed by adjudication.RESULTS: There were 1340 patients in the DEIC, 1352 in the ZAIC, and 408 in the DESC. The median ages of the 3 cohorts were 70, 69, and 70 years, respectively; the proportions of men were 72.6%, 53.8%, and 48.3%, respectively; and the median follow‐up was 19.8, 12.9, and 13.3 months, respectively. The 5‐year incidence proportions of ONJ were 5.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4%‐7.3%) in the DEIC, 1.4% (95% CI, 0.8%‐2.3%) in the ZAIC, and 6.6% (95% CI, 4.2%‐10.0%) in the DESC. The corresponding ONJ incidence rates per 100 person‐years were 3.0 (95% CI, 2.3‐3.7), 1.0 (95% CI, 0.6‐1.5), and 4.3 (95% CI, 2.8‐6.3). Incidence proportions and incidence rates were highest in patients with prostate cancer and in Denmark.CONCLUSIONS: This study provides estimates of the risk of medically confirmed ONJ among patients initiating denosumab or zoledronic acid in routine clinical practice in 3 Scandinavian countries. The results varied by cancer site and by country.LAY SUMMARY: Denosumab and zoledronic acid reduce the risk of bone fractures, pain, and surgery in patients with advanced cancers involving bone. Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ)—death of a jawbone—is a known side effect of treatment with denosumab or zoledronic acid. The authors examined almost 2900 denosumab‐ or zoledronic acid–treated patients with cancer in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. Over the course of 5 years, ONJ developed in 5.7% of the patients whose initial treatment was denosumab, in 1.4% of the patients whose initial treatment was zoledronic acid, and in 6.6% of the patients who switched from zoledronic acid to denosumab.

Estimate the effect of Radium-223 (Ra-223) on the incidence of bone fractures, prostate cancer death, and all-cause death compared with other standard treatments for metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Using a cohort design, we estimated the effect of Ra-223 on the risk of bone fractures, all-cause and prostate cancer-specific mortality across different lines of treatment for mCRPC using Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (2013-2018). The comparator group comprised other standard treatments for mCRPC. We used 36-month risk differences and hazard ratios (HRs) as effect estimates. The number of eligible individuals was 635, 453, 262, and 84 for the first-, second-, third-, and fourth-line cohorts, respectively. When compared Ra-223 to other standard treatments, the difference in the 36-month risk of fracture was 6% (95% confidence interval [CI], -7% to 18%) in the first-line cohort (n = 635) and 8% (95% CI, -7% to 18%) in the second-line cohort (n = 453). The number of fractures in the third-/fourth-line cohorts was too small for an adjusted comparison. The difference in 36-month mortality was higher in the first-line cohort 13% (95% CI, -3% to 31%), but lower in the second- and third-/fourth-line cohorts-8% (95% CI, -23% to 7%) and -14% (95% CI, -21% to 16%) respectively. Most deaths were due to prostate cancer. Results suggest that the difference in the risk of fractures is small, if any. A difference in the risk of mortality may be present in first-line treatment, but a decreased risk of mortality was observed in second and later lines of treatment. The results on mortality need to be considered in the context of potential unmeasured or residual confounding.

The SWENOTECA-MIR prospective multicenter study aims to assess the clinical value of miR-371a-3p as a novel marker in metastatic germ cell tumor patients undergoing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), to predict the presence of viable residual tumor. A total of 114 patients (86 nonseminomas, 28 seminomas) who underwent surgery for presumed metastatic disease pre-chemotherapy (primary RPLND), and post-chemotherapy RPLND were included. The expression of miR-371a-3p was evaluated using RT-digital droplet PCR before and after RPLND. Pre- and post-operative miR-371a-3p levels were statistically compared, and optimism-corrected performance calculations compared with conventional serum tumor markers. Associations were evaluated by logistic regression. Patients who underwent primary RPLND were categorized into seminoma and nonseminoma groups. Among the seminoma patients (n = 24) undergoing primary RPLND, all had normal conventional markers. Six patients received adjuvant treatment before surgery. miR-371a-3p exhibited a sensitivity of 74%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100% and NPV of 21% for viable tumor. The levels of miR-371a-3p significantly decreased after surgery. In the nonseminoma group (n = 18) treated with primary RPLND, 22% had elevated conventional markers, and 3 had received prior adjuvant treatment. miR-371a-3p showed a sensitivity of 34%, specificity of 88%, PPV of 67% and NPV of 62% for the primary nonseminoma patients. No association was observed between stage or prior adjuvant treatment, and the outcome of the miR-test. In the post-chemotherapy group (n = 72), the miR-371a-3p sensitivity was 9%, reducing to 0 when excluding patients with seminoma (n = 4). Teratomas and benign histology were essentially negative. Our study highlights miR-371a-3p as a fairly sensitive and highly specific marker for pre-chemotherapy seminomas, outperforming conventional markers. However, in pre-chemotherapy non-seminomas as well as in post-chemotherapy patients, we observed low sensitivity and no significant differences in miR-371a-3p levels before and after surgery, suggesting limited utility for miR-371a-3p in this context.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the treatment safety of thermal ablation compared to surgical treatment of T1a tumors (small renal masses) at a high-volume center. We conducted an observational single-center study based on data collected form the National Swedish Kidney Cancer Register (NSKCR) between 2015 and 2021. In total, 444 treatments of T1a tumors were included. Patients underwent surgery (partial or total nephrectomy) or ablative treatment—radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or microwave ablation (MWA). Patient characteristics were retrieved from patient records, and tumor complexity was estimated from pre-interventional CT scans. The odds ratio (OR) of suffering from a severe surgical complication following ablative treatment was estimated using a logistic regression model adjusted for age, BMI, ASA physical status classification, smoking status and RENAL nephrometry score. The frequency of severe surgical complications was 6.3% (16/256 treatments) after surgical intervention and 2.1% (4/188 treatments) following ablative treatment. Our primary hypothesis that ablative treatment is associated with a lower risk of severe surgical complications is supported by the results (OR 0.39; 0.19–0.79; p = 0.013). When adjusting for age, smoking status, ASA score, BMI score and RENAL nephrometry score, we see an even greater difference between the two groups (OR 0.34; 0.17–0.68; p = 0.002). Our study was limited by the differences in patient and tumor characteristics between the two compared groups and the study design. If oncological outcomes are found to be comparable, ablative treatment should be considered as a first-line treatment for all small renal masses.

Introduction: Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is an immune-mediated condition associated with fibroinflammatory lesions that can occur at almost any anatomical site. It often presents as a multiorgan disease that may mimic malignancy, infection, or other immune-mediated conditions. Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) type 1 is the most prominent manifestation of IgG4-RD in the digestive tract, with common extra-pancreatic inflammation. We present the first patient with AIP and involvement of the testicles and nasal cavity. Patient and methods: A case of a patient with AIP type 1 and other organ involvement (bile ducts, testicles, nasal polyps, and lungs) is described. Additionally, a systematic review of AIP type 1 with testicular and nasal involvement was conducted. Results: The systematic review found two cases of AIP type 1 with testicular involvement and 143 cases with AIP type 1 with nasal cavity involvement. None of them had both testicular and nasal involvement. Conclusions: This is the first case of AIP type 1 with other organ involvement, including testicular and nasal involvement, to be described. The number of patients with nasal and testicular involvement described in the literature is low. Creating awareness of this rare clinical condition is necessary, especially due to the very effective available treatment with corticosteroids and rituximab.