Charles Spruck

Prof. Charles Spruck

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJia Z. Shen
Jia Z. Shen
ZQZhixin Qiu
Zhixin Qiu
QWQiulian Wu
Qiulian Wu
DFDarren Finlay
Darren Finlay
GGGuillermina Garcia
Guillermina Garcia
CSCharles Spruck
Charles Spruck

6 October 2021 in Cancer Discovery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZQZhixin Qiu
Zhixin Qiu
LZLinjie Zhao
Linjie Zhao
JSJIA SHEN
JIA SHEN
ZLZhengyu Liang
Zhengyu Liang
QWQiulian Wu
Qiulian Wu
JRJeremy N. Rich
Jeremy N. Rich
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most lethal primary brain cancer characterized by therapeutic resistance, which is promoted by GBM stem cells (GSC). Here, we interrogated gene expression and whole-genome CRISPR/Cas9 screening in a large panel of patient-derived GSCs, differentiated GBM cells (DGC), and neural stem cells (NSC) to identify master regulators of GSC stemness, revealing an essential transcription state with increased RNA polymerase II–mediated transcription. The YY1 and transcriptional CDK9 complex was essential for GSC survival and maintenance in vitro and in vivo. YY1 interacted with CDK9 to regulate transcription elongation in GSCs. Genetic or pharmacologic targeting of the YY1–CDK9 complex elicited RNA m6A modification–dependent interferon responses, reduced regulatory T-cell infiltration, and augmented efficacy of immune checkpoint therapy in GBM. Collectively, these results suggest that YY1–CDK9 transcription elongation complex defines a targetable cell state with active transcription, suppressed interferon responses, and immunotherapy resistance in GBM. Significance: Effective strategies to rewire immunosuppressive microenvironment and enhance immunotherapy response are still lacking in GBM. YY1-driven transcriptional elongation machinery represents a druggable target to activate interferon response and enhance anti–PD-1 response through regulating the m6A modification program, linking epigenetic regulation to immunomodulatory function in GBM. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 275

18 February 2022 in Molecular Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJia Z. Shen
Jia Z. Shen
ZQZhixin Qiu
Zhixin Qiu
QWQiulian Wu
Qiulian Wu
GZGuoxin Zhang
Guoxin Zhang
RHRebecca Harris
Rebecca Harris
CSCharles Spruck
Charles Spruck

31 March 2014 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YTYingMeei Tan
YingMeei Tan
DSDahui Sun
Dahui Sun
WJWeijian Jiang
Weijian Jiang
KKKathleen Klotz-Noack
Kathleen Klotz-Noack
AVAjay A. Vashisht
Ajay A. Vashisht
CSCharles Spruck
Charles Spruck
Cyclin E1 regulates the initiation of S-phase in cellular division. However, in many cancers, cyclin E1 is aberrantly overexpressed and this molecular phenotype correlates with increased tumor aggressiveness and poor patient survival. The molecular cause(s) of cyclin E1 abnormalities in cancers is poorly understood. Here, we show that cyclin E1 overexpression in cancer is promoted by dysregulation of the protein phosphatase PP2A-B55β. PP2A-B55β targets the N- and C-terminal phosphodegrons of cyclin E1 for dephosphorylation, thus protecting it from degradation mediated by the SCFFbxw7 ubiquitin ligase. Augmented B55β expression stabilizes cyclin E1 and promotes its overexpression in cancer-derived cell lines and breast tumors. Conversely, B55β ablation enforces the degradation of cyclin E1 and inhibits cancer cell proliferation in vitro and tumor formation in vivo. Therefore, PP2A-B55β promotes cyclin E1 overexpression by antagonizing its degradation and its inhibition could represent a therapeutic mechanism for abrogating cyclin E1 function in cancers. Cancer Res; 74(7); 2006–14. ©2014 AACR.

2 October 2024 in Biomolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJeffrey M Snowbarger
Jeffrey M Snowbarger
PKPraveen Koganti
Praveen Koganti
CSCharles Spruck
Charles Spruck
Repeating sequences of DNA, or repetitive elements (REs), are common features across both prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. Unlike many of their protein-coding counterparts, the functions of REs in host cells remained largely unknown and have often been overlooked. While there is still more to learn about their functions, REs are now recognized to play significant roles in both beneficial and pathological processes in their hosts at the cellular and organismal levels. Therefore, in this review, we discuss the various types of REs and review what is known about their evolution. In addition, we aim to classify general mechanisms by which REs promote processes that are variously beneficial and harmful to host cells/organisms. Finally, we address the emerging role of REs in cancer, aging, and neurological disorders and provide insights into how RE modulation could provide new therapeutic benefits for these specific conditions.

28 October 2011 in Cell Cycle
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CSCharles Spruck
Charles Spruck
Comment on: Lerner M, et al. Cell Cycle 2011; 10:2172-83.