Background: Laryngeal cancer affects quality of life (QoL), speech, and swallowing. Total laryngectomy (TL) causes severe impairments, while partial laryngectomy (PL) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) preserve the organ but yield variable outcomes. This study assesses QoL, speech rehabilitation, swallowing, and social reintegration across these treatments. Methods: This prospective observational cohort study was conducted at the ENT Clinic, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timișoara; recruitment was conducted between October 2019 and January 2024. Seventy-five patients diagnosed with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) were initially enrolled but only 15 patients (20%) completed the 12-month follow-up, with an attrition rate of 80%. Tumor stages ranged from T1 to T4a, with TL patients having a higher proportion of advanced-stage disease (Stage III–IV: 76%) compared to PL (45%) and CRT (50%). Validated instruments, including the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Head and Neck Cancer (EORTC QLQ-H&N35), the Voice Handicap Index-30 (VHI-30), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS), were used to assess QoL, voice function, swallowing function, and psychological impact. Results: At 12 months, the global QoL score from the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 was lowest in TL patients (49.8 ± 10.9), significantly lower than both PL (61.2 ± 9.6, p = 0.002) and CRT (64.1 ± 7.8, p < 0.001). Post hoc Bonferroni analysis confirmed significant pairwise differences between TL vs. PL (p = 0.002) and TL vs. CRT (p < 0.001), while the difference between PL and CRT was non-significant (p = 0.14). TL patients had higher speech-related disability (VHI: 88.3 ± 12.6) and dysphagia prevalence (DOSS: 4.0 ± 1.2), with 16% remaining enteral feeding-dependent. Anxiety (HADS-A: 7.5 ± 2.9) and depression (HADS-D: 9.0 ± 3.2) were highest in TL patients, with 36% meeting clinical depression criteria at 12 months. Multivariable regression identified TL (OR = 3.92, 95% CI: 2.14–5.79, p < 0.001) and advanced tumor stage (OR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.79–4.21, p = 0.002) as strong predictors of poor QoL. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed no significant OS differences (p = 0.12), but CRT patients had lower DFS (78%) compared to TL (82%) and PL (85%) (p = 0.048). Conclusions: TL patients experience the most significant impairments in QoL, speech, and social reintegration despite rehabilitation. CRT patients show higher recurrence rates but better QoL, while PL offers the best balance of function and survival. These findings highlight the need for long-term survivorship support tailored to treatment type.

Laryngeal cancer significantly affects not only survival but also core functions such as speech, swallowing, and breathing. These impairments often result in substantial psychological distress and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This review aims to synthesize current evidence regarding the psychological impact, quality of life outcomes, and system-level challenges faced by laryngeal cancer patients while identifying strategies for integrated survivorship care. Anxiety and depressive symptoms are highly prevalent among laryngeal cancer patients, particularly those undergoing total laryngectomy or chemoradiotherapy. HRQoL outcomes vary significantly depending on treatment modality, with long-term deficits noted in domains such as voice, swallowing, and emotional well-being. Access to psychological support and rehabilitation remains inconsistent, hindered by institutional, socioeconomic, and cultural barriers. Structured survivorship models, psychological screening, and patient-centered rehabilitation have demonstrated benefits but are not universally implemented. Comprehensive care for laryngeal cancer must extend beyond tumor control to address persistent functional and psychological sequelae. A multidisciplinary, anticipatory, and personalized approach—centered on integrated rehabilitation and mental health support—is essential to optimize survivorship outcomes and improve long-term quality of life.

Patients diagnosed with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion ((L-SIL) or atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) are subjected to additional investigations, such as colposcopy and biopsy, to rule out cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ (CIN 2+). Especially in young patients, lesions tend to regress spontaneously, and many human papilloma virus (HPV) infections are transient. Dual-staining p16/Ki-67 has been proposed for the triage of patients with ASC-US or L-SIL, but no prospective study addressing only this subgroup of patients has been conducted so far. We performed a prospective study including all eligible patients referred for a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Timișoara University City Hospital. HPV genotyping and dual-staining for p16/Ki-67 were performed prior to LEEP, at 6 and 12 months after LEEP. A total of 60 patients were included in the study and completed the follow-up evaluation. We analyzed the sensitivity and specificity for biopsy-confirmed CIN2+ using the 95% confidence interval (CI) of high-risk human papilloma virus (HR-HPV), dual-staining p16/Ki-67, colposcopy, and combinations of the tests on all patients and separately for the ASC-US and L-SIL groups. Dual-staining p16/Ki-67 alone or in combination with HR-HPV and/or colposcopy showed a higher specificity that HR-HPV and/or colposcopy for the diagnosis of biopsy confirmed CIN2+ in patients under 30 years. Colposcopy + p16/Ki-67 and HR-HPV + colposcopy + p16/Ki-67 showed the highest specificity in our study.