Prion–like domains (PrLDs), a unique type of low–complexity domain (LCD) or intrinsically disordered region (IDR), have been shown to mediate protein liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS). Recent research has increasingly focused on how prion–like proteins (PrLPs) regulate plant growth, development, and stress responses. This review provides a comprehensive overview of plant PrLPs. We analyze the structural features of PrLPs and the mechanisms by which PrLPs undergo LLPS. Through gene ontology (GO) analysis, we highlight the diverse molecular functions of PrLPs and explore how PrLPs influence plant development and stress responses via phase separation. Finally, we address unresolved questions about PrLP regulatory mechanisms, offering prospects for future research.

Phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P₂) is known to be an instrumental anionic phospholipid in governing pollen germination and pollen tube growth. However, the precise functions and regulatory mechanisms of PI(4,5)P₂ in pollen polarity establishment and germination remain poorly understood. Our previous studies demonstrated the pivotal involvement of Arabidopsis formin homology 5 (AtFH5)‐dependent vesicle trafficking in polarity establishment of pollen. Here, we observed that PI(4,5)P₂ accumulated and oscillated at the prospective germination site, a process closely associated with the rotational movement of AtFH5‐labeled vesicles. Disruption of the mobility of AtFH5‐labeled vesicles, either through AtFH5 mutation or pharmacological treatment, significantly perturbed the accumulation of PI(4,5)P₂ at the plasma membrane. Subcellular localization and genetic analysis revealed that two phosphatidylinositol 4‐phosphate 5‐kinases, AtPIP5K1 and AtPIP5K4, are essential for PI(4,5)P₂ oscillation at the germination site prior to pollen germination. Furthermore, we found that the dynamics of AtPIP5K4 depended on the mobility of AtFH5‐labeled vesicles and reduced PI(4,5)P₂ in turn disturbed the attachment of AtFH5‐labeled secretory vesicles to the plasma membrane. In conclusion, these findings collectively highlight the reciprocal regulation of AtFH5‐labeled secretory vesicles and PI(4,5)P₂ oscillations at the plasma membrane, providing critical insights into the molecular mechanism underlying polarity establishment during pollen germination.

Actin cytoskeleton drives the targeted transport of cell wall components to sustain the tip growth of pollen tubes for double fertilization; however, the underlying mechanism remains largely unknown. Arabidopsis formin 5 (AtFH5), an actin-nucleating protein, localizes at secretory vesicles and mediates actin polymerization-based vesicle trafficking in pollen. Here, we demonstrate that AtFH5 determines the recruitment and transport of cell wall components in AtFH5-labeled vesicles during the tip growth of pollen tubes. Through a screen of interacting proteins of AtFH5, we identify many cell wall–related proteins, with arabinogalactan protein 23 (AGP23) occupying the highest frequency. AtFH5 interacts with AGP23 via its N-terminal extracellular domain (ECD) and jointly regulate the pollen germination and tube growth process. Further observations reveal that AGP23 co-localizes with AtFH5 at moving vesicles, germination sites, and pollen tube tips, suggesting that AGP23 is delivered by AtFH5-labeled vesicles. Deletion of the ECD of AtFH5 interrupts the dynamic localization and cell-wall connection of AGP23 in pollen grains and tubes. Cytological and genetic evidence shows that AGP23 and AtFH5 work in the same pathway to modulate cell wall composition. Together, our data uncover a role of formin in directing the sorting and deposition of cell wall components via secretory vesicle trafficking during pollen germination and tube growth.

Mitogen-activated protein kinases 3 and 6 (MPK3/MPK6) are central to pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) in Arabidopsis, yet the involvement of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs, >200 nt) in these pathways is poorly understood. Here, transcriptomic analyses were performed to compare lncRNA and protein-coding gene (PCG) expression profiles in wild-type (WT) and MPK3/MPK6-deficient (MPK6SR) Arabidopsis plants. These plants were inoculated with either Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000, which elicits both PTI and ETI, or its type III secretion-deficient mutant, Pst DC3000 hrcC⁻, which induces only PTI. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis of 18 samples identified 1388 known and 70 novel lncRNAs, among which differentially expressed lncRNAs (DElncRNAs) involved in disease resistance were further identified. Using integrative analyses, including weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), prediction of lncRNA cis-regulatory targets for PCGs, and validation via reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), three core lncRNA-mediated regulatory modules were identified: (i) MPK3/MPK6-dependent PTI and ETI, where lncRNAs amplify signals; (ii) MPK3/MPK6-dependent PTI, where lncRNAs fine-tune basal immunity; and (iii) MPK3/MPK6-independent PTI and ETI, where lncRNAs serve as a backup regulatory network. These modules form a multi-layered immune regulatory network via cis- and trans-regulation and further enable the identification of lncRNA-PCG pairs involved in both regulatory modes. This work enhances the understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying plant innate immunity.