Burn injuries can have long-lasting effects not only on a person’s bodily integrity but also on their psychosocial well-being. Since medical advancements have increased survival from burn injuries, improving psychosocial health has become a pivotal goal for burn rehabilitation. Besides health-related quality of life, life satisfaction has become an important parameter for evaluating long-term outcomes after burns. We reviewed life satisfaction after burns among adult burn patients to evaluate the current assessment methods and gain insight into recovery patterns. PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Library were searched systematically for studies in the English language covering life satisfaction after burns, resulting in the inclusion of 18 studies. The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) was the most commonly used assessment tool. Others included the Life Satisfaction Index-A (LSI-A) and a non-standardized tool. Most studies’ recovery patterns showed a decreased life satisfaction post-burn injury. There was strong agreement that inhalation injury, body dysfunction, an extended hospital stay, and psychological illness before the injury are possible determinants of post-burn life satisfaction and have shown a negative correlation. There seems to be a consistent use of assessment tools, which opens up the possibility of a further comparative investigation to better understand factors that influence life satisfaction after a burn so that this knowledge can be used to improve patients’ recovery.

Exercise training for burn patients has become a major part of rehabilitation programs within the last decades. One of the main reasons for prolonged and long-term increased morbidity and mortality in this population is a persistent catabolic state with subsequent loss of lean body mass (LBM). A combination of resistance and aerobic exercises as well as stretching has shown to improve physical function by enhancing cardiopulmonary fitness, LBM, and strength and thus leading to ameliorated long-term outcomes of patients recovering from burns. In this literature review, we show an outline of the implementation of exercise training over the last decades into standardized care for patients with burns.

Background: Weight extremes are linked to morbidity, yet their impact on burn outcomes remains underinvestigated. Prior studies suggest an ‘obesity paradox’, showing survival benefits and better functional outcomes in obese patients. Methods: This study used the global real-world database TriNetX to assess the association between body mass index (BMI) and clinical outcomes in adult burn patients, categorized using WHO definitions. After 1:1 propensity score matching for demographics, burn severity, and smoke inhalation injury, clinical outcomes were analyzed over a six-month period following burn injury. Outcomes included mortality, sepsis, pneumonia, acute kidney injury (AKI), cardiovascular events, graft complications, skin infections, and psychological impairment. Results: After matching, 9736 patients were included in the underweight versus normal weight comparison, 72,274 in overweight versus normal weight, 71,195 in obesity versus normal weight, and 9732 in underweight versus obesity. Underweight patients were associated with higher mortality and increased risks of sepsis, pneumonia, cardiovascular events, and psychological impairment. Overweight and obese patients showed higher survival rates and overall better clinical outcome associations. Conclusions: These findings are consistent with the previously described ‘obesity paradox’ in burn care and identify underweight burn patients as a distinct high-risk subgroup.