Background/Objectives: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common procedure for knee osteoarthritis. While conventional TKA (C-TKA) remains standard, robot-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) has been introduced to enhance implant positioning and clinical outcomes. However, its comparative benefits remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared RA-TKA with C-TKA, examining the influence of robotic system, surgeon experience, and follow-up duration. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RA-TKA with C-TKA were included. Outcomes were categorized into clinical, radiographic, and safety endpoints. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses explored factors influencing outcome variability, including robotic system, number of surgeons, and follow-up duration. Results: Twenty-five RCTs (5614 patients) were analyzed. RA-TKA showed modest improvements in clinical outcomes, such as KSS and VAS pain scores, but results varied across subgroups. RA-TKA demonstrated a significantly better flexion range of motion (ROM) in certain countries (e.g., Russia, MD = 10; 95%CI: 5.44, 14.56) and with specific robotic systems (e.g., NAVIO). No significant differences were found in OKS and HSS scores. Radiographic outcomes, including the HKA Angle, varied by robotic system, with NAVIO and YUANHUA showing better alignment than C-TKA. Complication rates were comparable, though RA-TKA had a higher risk of conversion to open surgery (10% vs. 2%). Meta-regression identified robotic system and surgeon experience as key predictors of outcome variability. Conclusions: RA-TKA offers advantages in implant alignment and postoperative pain reduction. However, benefits are inconsistent across settings, and some robotic systems may not provide improvements over C-TKA.

Background/Objectives: To compare the radiographic, perioperative, and patient-reported outcomes between anterior vertebral body tethering (VBT) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was performed through May 2025. Studies directly comparing anterior VBT and PSF in skeletally immature patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were included. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis and expressed as mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The NIH quality assessment tool was used to evaluate risk of bias. Results: Ten studies comprising 1168 patients (573 VBT, 595 PSF) were included. At 2 years, VBT showed a significantly greater main thoracic curve (MD = 5.03°; 95% CI: 1.87–8.20) and proximal thoracic curve (MD = 3.27°; 95% CI: 1.16–5.38), but no difference in lumbar or main curve Cobb angles. VBT was associated with significantly reduced thoracic kyphosis (MD = −2.68°), increased T1 tilt (MD = 1.50°), shorter operative time (MD = −99.23 min), less blood loss (MD = −405.44 mL), and shorter hospital stay (MD = −1.34 days). However, VBT had a significantly higher revision rate (OR = 5.54; 95% CI: 2.81–10.94). No significant differences were noted in SRS-22 domains, except for higher mental health scores in the VBT group (MD = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.07–1.06). Conclusions: Anterior VBT offers perioperative advantages and comparable radiographic correction to PSF in selected adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis, but at the cost of higher revision rates.

Background: Femoral neck fractures pose significant surgical challenges with high morbidity and mortality. Traditional freehand screw placement often yields variable outcomes. Recent robotic advancements offer a promising alternative with enhanced precision. Methods: This systematic review compares the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted versus freehand techniques. A comprehensive literature search across multiple databases up to July 2024 included studies comparing both techniques. Primary outcomes were the union rate and time, functional outcomes, operative time, intraoperative parameters, and complication rates. Meta-regression analyses identified treatment response determinants. Results: Twenty-four studies (1437 patients) were included. Robot-assisted screw placement significantly improved the union rate, reduced the union time, and showed superior functional outcomes. Additionally, it resulted in shorter operative times, less intraoperative blood loss, and fewer instances of fluoroscopy and guide pin insertion. The risk of femoral neck necrosis was notably lower with robotic assistance. Meta-regression highlighted the robot type, patient age, and sample size as significant factors. Conclusions: Despite the promise of robot-assisted screw placement, limitations exist. The evidence being mainly from China raises concerns about generalizability. The lack of long-term follow-up data hinders assessment of technique durability. Unreported surgeon expertise levels and learning curves affect result validity. High initial costs and steep learning curves of robotic systems also present barriers to widespread adoption.

Background: Native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges requiring adherence to complex clinical guidelines. The emergence of large language models (LLMs) offers new avenues for real-time clinical decision support, yet their utility in managing NVO has not been formally assessed. Methods: This study evaluated four LLMs—Consensus, Gemini, ChatGPT-4o Mini, and ChatGPT-4o—using 13 standardized questions derived from the 2015 IDSA guidelines. Each model generated 13 responses (n = 52), which were independently assessed by three orthopedic surgeons for accuracy (4-point scale) and comprehensiveness (five-point scale). Results: ChatGPT-4o produced the longest responses (428.0 ± 45.4 words), followed by ChatGPT-4o Mini (392.2 ± 97.4), Gemini (358.2 ± 60.5), and Consensus (213.2 ± 68.8). Accuracy ratings showed that ChatGPT-4o and Gemini achieved the highest proportion of “Excellent” responses (54% and 51%, respectively), while Consensus received only 20%. Comprehensiveness scores mirrored this trend, with ChatGPT-4o (3.95 ± 0.79) and Gemini (3.82 ± 0.68) significantly outperforming Consensus (2.87 ± 0.66). Domain-specific analysis revealed that ChatGPT-4o achieved a 100% “Excellent” accuracy rating in therapy-related questions. Statistical analysis confirmed significant inter-model differences (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Advanced LLMs—especially ChatGPT-4o and Gemini—demonstrated high accuracy and depth in interpreting clinical guidelines for NVO. These findings highlight their potential as effective tools in augmenting evidence-based decision-making and improving consistency in clinical care.

Purpose: This study evaluates whether the fracture level alters the outcomes of minimally invasive hybrid stabilization (MIHS) with double-threaded, uncemented polyaxial screws for unstable osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Methods: This prospective cohort study included 73 patients (71.23% females, mean age: 79.9 ± 8.8 years) with unstable OF 3–4 fractures treated by MIHS between Nov 2015-Jan 2018. Patient characteristics, operative data, clinical outcomes, complications, radiological outcomes, and midterm (24-month) follow-up regarding functionality, pain, and quality of life were analyzed. Results: Patients had thoracolumbar (71.23%), thoracic (10.97%), and lumbar (17.8%) fractures. Operative time was < 120 min in 73.97% of patients, with blood loss < 500 ml in 97.25% of cases. No in-hospital mortality was recorded. Spine-associated complications occurred in 15.07% of patients, while 36.98% of patients had urinary tract infections (n = 12), pneumonia (n = 5), and electrolyte disturbances (n = 9). The mean length of hospital stay was 13.38 ± 7.20 days. Clinically-relevant screw loosening occurred in 1.7% of screws, and secondary adjacent fractures were diagnosed in 5.48% of patients. The alpha-angle improved significantly postoperatively (mean change: 5.4°) and remained stable for 24 months. The beta-angle improved significantly from 16.3° ± 7.5 to 10.8° ± 5.6 postoperatively but increased slightly to 14.1° ± 6.2 at midterm follow-up. Although no differences were seen regarding baseline data, clinical outcomes, and complications, fracture level significantly altered the COMI score at 24 months with no effect on pain score or quality-of-life. Conclusion: MIHS using polyaxial screws is a safe treatment for single-level osteoporotic spinal fractures. Fracture level did not alter radiological reduction loss; however, it significantly altered patients’ function at 24 months.

Background/Objectives: Trochanteric femoral fractures pose significant surgical challenges, particularly in elderly patients. Intramedullary nailing (IMN) and plate fixation (PF) are the primary operative strategies, yet their comparative efficacy and safety remain debated. This meta-analysis synthesizes randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate clinical, functional, perioperative, and biomechanical outcomes of IMN versus PF specifically in trochanteric fractures. Methods: A systematic search of six databases was conducted up to 20 May 2024, to identify RCTs comparing IMN and PF in adult patients with trochanteric femoral fractures. Data extraction followed PRISMA guidelines, and outcomes were pooled using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses examined the influence of fracture stability, implant type, and patient age. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Results: Fourteen RCTs (n = 4603 patients) were included. No significant differences were found in reoperation rates, union time, implant cut-out, or mortality. IMN was associated with significantly reduced operative time (MD = −5.18 min), fluoroscopy time (MD = −32.92 s), and perioperative blood loss (MD = −111.68 mL). It also had a lower risk of deep infection. Functional outcomes and anatomical results were comparable. Subgroup analyses revealed fracture stability and nail type significantly modified operative time, and compression screws were associated with higher reoperation rates than IMN. Conclusions: For trochanteric femoral fractures, IMN and PF yield comparable results for most clinical outcomes, with IMN offering some advantages in surgical efficiency and perioperative morbidity, though functional outcomes were comparable. Implant selection and fracture stability influence outcomes, supporting individualized surgical decision making.