Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is becoming an increasingly prevalent strategy in the clinical realm of cancer therapeutics. With more patients being administered ICB for a host of tumor types, the scope of adverse events associated with these drugs will likely grow. Here we report a case of aplastic anemia (AA) in a patient with metastatic melanoma secondary to dual ICB therapy. To our knowledge, this is only the second case of AA secondary to dual ICB in the literature, and the first to have a positive patient outcome. A 51-year old male with metastatic melanoma was started on dual immune checkpoint blockade, in the form ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) and nivolumab (1 mg/kg). Two weeks following the second cycle, he presented to the emergency department with profound polypipsia, polyuria and fatigue. The patient was diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis secondary to immune therapy induced type-1 diabetes and was admitted to the ICU. While in hospital the patient developed a symptomatic anemia and neutropenia. A bone marrow biopsy revealed a markedly hypocellular marrow with trinlineage hypoplasia with no evidence of myelodysplasia, neoplasm or excess blasts. Flow cytometry revealed an inverted CD4+:CD8+ ratio and an absence of hematogones. Taken together the presumed etiology was AA secondary to immunotherapy. The patient was subsequently started in IV methylprednisone 70 mg/day for 8 days, followed by a prednisone taper. This intervention rectified the bicytopenia and to date the patient has shown stable blood counts. With the use of ICBs becoming increasingly prevalent in the clinical arena, the number of patients presenting with immune-related adverse events will likely increase. The current case illustrates the need to be vigilant when managing cancer patients receiving ICB. The resolution of this patient’s AA with corticosteroids highlights the value of early detection and appropriate treatment of these rare immune-mediated adverse events.

Immunoparesis and polyclonal immunoglobulin recovery have been recently described as common indicators of immune dysfunction in patients with multiple myeloma. In the present study, we aimed to assess the impact of immunoparesis and polyclonal immunoglobulin recovery at day-100 post autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT) on clinical outcomes. A total of 302 patients were included for the analysis of immunoparesis, and 197 were evaluable for polyclonal immunoglobulin recovery evaluation. Immunoparesis was observed in 93.5% of cases, with 47% of cases having polyclonal immunoglobulin recovery at 12 months post auto-SCT. Median overall and progression-free survival were longer in the group of patients with complete or partial normalization of polyclonal immunoglobulins. Patients receiving consolidation had a lower level of polyclonal reconstitution. In conclusion, polyclonal immunoglobulin recovery by 12 months post-auto-SCT is associated with superior overall and progression free survival in patients with MM. Efforts to better enhance polyclonal recovery deserve further investigation.