Luis Rafael Ramos-Pascua

Dr. Luis Rafael Ramos-Pascua

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

1 November 2013 in Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LRLuis Rafael Ramos-Pascua
Luis Rafael Ramos-Pascua
OGO.A. Guerra-Álvarez
O.A. Guerra-Álvarez
SSS. Sánchez-Herráez
S. Sánchez-Herráez
FIF.M. Izquierdo-García
F.M. Izquierdo-García
JMJose-Angel Maderuelo-Fernandez
Jose-Angel Maderuelo-Fernandez

1 August 2017 in Radiography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LRLuis Rafael Ramos-Pascua
Luis Rafael Ramos-Pascua
JSJosé Ángel Santos-Sánchez
José Ángel Santos-Sánchez
JWJ.D. Samper Wamba
J.D. Samper Wamba
ACA. Alvarez Castro
A. Alvarez Castro
JAJ. Rodriguez Altonaga
J. Rodriguez Altonaga

1 January 2012 in Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LRLuis Rafael Ramos-Pascua
Luis Rafael Ramos-Pascua
SSS. Sánchez-Herráez
S. Sánchez-Herráez
JAJ.A. Alonso-Barrio
J.A. Alonso-Barrio
AAA. Alonso-León
A. Alonso-León

1 January 2016 in Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LRLuis Rafael Ramos-Pascua
Luis Rafael Ramos-Pascua
JCJosé A. Carro-Fernández
José A. Carro-Fernández
JSJosé A. Santos-Sánchez
José A. Santos-Sánchez
PRPaula Casas Ramos
Paula Casas Ramos
LDLuis J. Díez-Romero
Luis J. Díez-Romero
FIFrancisco M. Izquierdo-García
Francisco M. Izquierdo-García
Ramos-Pascua LR, et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2016 Mar;8(1):106-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2016.8.1.106

26 November 2021 in Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CHCarlos Hernández-Pascual
Carlos Hernández-Pascual
JSJosé Ángel Santos-Sánchez
José Ángel Santos-Sánchez
JGJuan Manuel Garcia-Gonzalez
Juan Manuel Garcia-Gonzalez
CSCarlos Fernando Silva-Viamonte
Carlos Fernando Silva-Viamonte
CPCarmen Pablos-Hernández
Carmen Pablos-Hernández
JOSÉ ANTONIO MIRÓN-CANELOJOSÉ ANTONIO MIRÓN-CANELO
JOSÉ ANTONIO MIRÓN-CANELO
Background: Few publications have assessed long-term results of distal locking of short endomedullary nails for extracapsular hip fracture. Virtually all of them focus on immediate differences. Criteria for the use of static or dynamic locking are unclear in most nailing systems, and use is advised in unstable fracture patterns or with risk of bell-clapper effect, but often influenced by the “orthopaedic school”. Materials and methods: This is a historical cohort study on patients diagnosed and operated in 2014 and followed up until endpoint, considered as consolidation or major complication, plus evaluation of overall long-term survival. They were categorised as static distal locking (ST) or dynamic distal locking (DN). Both are comparable, except for all stable pre-operative classifications, Fracture Mobility Score (FMS) at discharge, and immediate post-operative loading, all of which were in favour of DN. Results: Consolidation took place in > 95% of patients, with a non-statistically significant delay trend in ST. Less than 6% in both ST and DN had major complications, with no differences. Most cases suffered early cut-out. Significant fracture collapse was the most frequent minor complication. There were more statistically significant minor and total complications in ST. Infection, without differences, can precede cut-out. Lateral thigh pain was similar and could be related to back-out. In DN, 21.1% of cases were truly dynamised. We did not find differences in mobility or in long-term survival. Conclusions: Any type of distal locking seems to be safe for consolidation, despite a slightly longer consolidation time in static locking. Early cut-out was the main complication, while others were very infrequent, which is an advantage over helical blade devices. There was a higher rate of minor and overall mechanical complications in ST, but infection and lateral thigh pain were similar. Most non-traumatic mechanical complications occurred around 5–6 weeks. About one in five of the DN truly dynamised, with all cases occurring before 8 weeks. Mobility until endpoint and overall long-term survival were not influenced by the locking mode used. Level of evidence: Therapeutic study, level 2b.