Background: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a long-term and complex chronic disease that seriously affects the physical and mental health and quality of life of patients. Massage, as one of the methods in traditional Chinese medicine, can treat both symptoms and root causes and is widely used to treat CFS. The main purpose is to systematically evaluate the impact of massage therapy on the efficacy and safety of CFS patients, providing a reference for clinical practice. Methods: By searching for literature published in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, Wanfang Database, VIP Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database until November 2023, randomized controlled trial studies were selected according to the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Cochrane system evaluation manual was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies, and RevMan5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. Results: 32 randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 2594 CFS patients. Meta-analysis showed that the total score of the fatigue scale (FS-14) in the treatment group, MD = −1.59, 95% CI (−1.84, −1.34), P < .00001; Physical fatigue score, MD = −1.30, 95% CI (−1.60, −1.00), P < .00001; Mental fatigue score, MD = −0.84, 95% CI (−0.99, −0.72), P < .0001]; Effective rate [RR = 1.23, 95% CI (1.19,1.28), P < .00001]; all indicators were superior to the control group, Only one study reported adverse reactions, including local swelling, skin bruising, and nausea. Conclusion: Our research findings suggest that massage therapy has a significant therapeutic effect on CFS, avoiding adverse reactions and improving fatigue symptoms. Therefore, massage therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome should be further promoted and applied.

Background: More and more studies have shown that Chinese medicine can effectively and safely treat allergic rhinitis (AR) in children. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety differences between conventional therapy and the Chinese herbal medicine Cang-Er-Zi-San (CEZS) from an evidence-based perspective, and guide the clinical treatment of pediatric AR. Methods: This study aims to compare the effects of intervention with traditional Chinese medicine formula CEZS on the clinical symptoms of pediatric AR, determine the effectiveness and safety of CEZS in treating pediatric AR, and obtain high-quality clinical evidence. Research method: based on the preferred reporting item (PRISMA) statement of systematic review and meta-analysis, inclusion and exclusion criteria were established. Retrieve 7 mainstream medical databases to obtain randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of traditional Chinese medicine CEZS for the treatment of pediatric AR. Include RCTs that meet research requirements. Then extract the data information and evaluate the quality using the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan software on the effective rate, clinical symptom relief time, recurrence rate, and adverse event indicators. Calculate relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI), test heterogeneity identify its source, evaluate publication bias through funnel plots. Results: 15 RCTs and 1361 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the efficacy of Chinese herbal compound CEZS in the treatment of children with AR was significantly superior to other therapies. Effective rate (RR = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.15, 1.26) The difference was statistically significant, and the symptom relief time, Recurrence rate, adverse event, the time of symptom relief in the treatment group were all better than those in the control group. It is suggested that CEZS therapy is more suitable for the clinical treatment of children with AR. Conclusion: CEZS has a definite therapeutic effect on children with AR and is an effective method for treating it. However, due to biased results and limited research, a large number of high-quality studies are needed to validate the effectiveness of CEZS and provide new treatments for clinical reference.

Background: Functional abdominal pain syndrome (FAPS) is a relatively uncommon functional gastrointestinal disorder. Recent years have witnessed substantial advancements in the study of FAPS; however, no bibliometric analyses have been conducted to date. Objective: This study systematically reviews current research and emerging issues in the field of FAPS using bibliometric methods to understand research trends and future development prospects. Methods: The foundational literature in the field of FAPS was sourced from the Web of Science database. Visual analysis was performed using CiteSpace and VOSviewer software, focusing on factors such as the number of published papers, countries (regions), research institutions, journals, authors, highly cited papers, and keywords. Results: From 1996 to 2025, 996 publications were analyzed, showing a phased growth in annual publication volume peaking in 2021. The United States led in publications and centrality. The “Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition” had the highest publication count. Marc A. Benninga authored the most articles, notably “Functional Disorders: Children and Adolescents.” The prevalent keyword was “children.” Research on FAPS focuses on evolving disease definitions, the “brain–gut interaction disorder” paradigm, the microbiota–gut–brain axis, children with irritable bowel syndrome, functional abdominal pain, and nonpharmaceutical therapies like probiotics, dietary interventions, and cognitive behavioral therapy. Pediatric populations and non-pharmacological interventions were the most prominent themes, whereas adult-specific research and biomarker-related studies appeared less frequently. Conclusion: This bibliometric study identified key research areas including the microbiota–gut–brain axis, pediatric populations, and non-pharmacological interventions, alongside emerging topics such as gut–brain interaction disorders. These findings suggest that future research should prioritize large-scale trials validating non-pharmacological therapies and biomarkers for central sensitization. Clinically, the development of age-specific diagnostic protocols and interdisciplinary management teams integrating gastroenterology, neurology, and psychology is warranted to improve patient outcomes.