Stefan Ast

Mr. Stefan Ast


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 March 2015 in Classical and Quantum Gravity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TCThe LIGO Scientific Collaboration
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration
JAJ Aasi
J Aasi
BAB P Abbott
B P Abbott
RAR Abbott
R Abbott
TAT Abbott
T Abbott
JZJ Zweizig
J Zweizig
The Advanced LIGO gravitational wave detectors are second-generation instruments designed and built for the two LIGO observatories in Hanford, WA and Livingston, LA, USA. The two instruments are identical in design, and are specialized versions of a Michelson interferometer with 4 km long arms. As in Initial LIGO, Fabry–Perot cavities are used in the arms to increase the interaction time with a gravitational wave, and power recycling is used to increase the effective laser power. Signal recycling has been added in Advanced LIGO to improve the frequency response. In the most sensitive frequency region around 100 Hz, the design strain sensitivity is a factor of 10 better than Initial LIGO. In addition, the low frequency end of the sensitivity band is moved from 40 Hz down to 10 Hz. All interferometer components have been replaced with improved technologies to achieve this sensitivity gain. Much better seismic isolation and test mass suspensions are responsible for the gains at lower frequencies. Higher laser power, larger test masses and improved mirror coatings lead to the improved sensitivity at mid and high frequencies. Data collecting runs with these new instruments are planned to begin in mid-2015.

21 July 2013 in Nature Photonics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JAJ. Aasi
J. Aasi
JAJ. Abadie
J. Abadie
BAB. P. Abbott
B. P. Abbott
RAR. Abbott
R. Abbott
TAT. D. Abbott
T. D. Abbott
JZJ. Zweizig
J. Zweizig
Nearly a century after Einstein first predicted the existence of gravitational waves, a global network of Earth-based gravitational wave observatories1,2,3,4 is seeking to directly detect this faint radiation using precision laser interferometry. Photon shot noise, due to the quantum nature of light, imposes a fundamental limit on the attometre-level sensitivity of the kilometre-scale Michelson interferometers deployed for this task. Here, we inject squeezed states to improve the performance of one of the detectors of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) beyond the quantum noise limit, most notably in the frequency region down to 150 Hz, critically important for several astrophysical sources, with no deterioration of performance observed at any frequency. With the injection of squeezed states, this LIGO detector demonstrated the best broadband sensitivity to gravitational waves ever achieved, with important implications for observing the gravitational-wave Universe with unprecedented sensitivity.

13 May 2015 in Classical and Quantum Gravity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JAJ Aasi
J Aasi
JAJ Abadie
J Abadie
BAB P Abbott
B P Abbott
RAR Abbott
R Abbott
TAT Abbott
T Abbott
JZJ Zweizig
J Zweizig
In 2009–2010, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) operated together with international partners Virgo and GEO600 as a network to search for gravitational waves (GWs) of astrophysical origin. The sensitivity of these detectors was limited by a combination of noise sources inherent to the instrumental design and its environment, often localized in time or frequency, that couple into the GW readout. Here we review the performance of the LIGO instruments during this epoch, the work done to characterize the detectors and their data, and the effect that transient and continuous noise artefacts have on the sensitivity of LIGO to a variety of astrophysical sources.

1 December 2011 in Optics Express
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMoritz Mehmet
Moritz Mehmet
SAStefan Ast
Stefan Ast
TETobias Eberle
Tobias Eberle
SSSebastian Steinlechner
Sebastian Steinlechner
HVHenning Vahlbruch
Henning Vahlbruch
RSRoman Schnabel
Roman Schnabel
Optics InfoBase is the Optical Society's online library for flagship journals, partnered and copublished journals, and recent proceedings from OSA conferences.

4 September 2013 in Physical Review D
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JAJ. Aasi
J. Aasi
JAJ. Abadie
J. Abadie
BAB. P. Abbott
B. P. Abbott
RAR. Abbott
R. Abbott
TAT. D. Abbott
T. D. Abbott
JZJ. Zweizig
J. Zweizig
Compact binary systems with neutron stars or black holes are one of the most promising sources for ground-based gravitational-wave detectors. Gravitational radiation encodes rich information about source physics; thus parameter estimation and model selection are crucial analysis steps for any detection candidate events. Detailed models of the anticipated waveforms enable inference on several parameters, such as component masses, spins, sky location and distance, that are essential for new astrophysical studies of these sources. However, accurate measurements of these parameters and discrimination of models describing the underlying physics are complicated by artifacts in the data, uncertainties in the waveform models and in the calibration of the detectors. Here we report such measurements on a selection of simulated signals added either in hardware or software to the data collected by the two LIGO instruments and the Virgo detector during their most recent joint science run, including a “blind injection” where the signal was not initially revealed to the collaboration. We exemplify the ability to extract information about the source physics on signals that cover the neutron-star and black-hole binary parameter space over the component mass range 1 M⊙–25 M⊙ and the full range of spin parameters. The cases reported in this study provide a snapshot of the status of parameter estimation in preparation for the operation of advanced detectors.

2 April 2014 in The Astrophysical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JAJ. Aasi
J. Aasi
JAJ. Abadie
J. Abadie
BAB. P. Abbott
B. P. Abbott
RAR. Abbott
R. Abbott
TAT. Abbott
T. Abbott
BSB. W. Stappers
B. W. Stappers