Qingsheng Liu

Dr. Qingsheng Liu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 August 2024 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QLQingsheng Liu
Qingsheng Liu
QLQiling Lu
Qiling Lu
LZLiudong Zhang
Liudong Zhang
SWShufang Wang
Shufang Wang
AZAiqing Zou
Aiqing Zou
LCLihong Chen
Lihong Chen
In order to address the increasingly prominent issues of water resource protection and agricultural non-point source pollution in the Erhai Lake Basin, this study conducted a two-year field experiment in Gusheng Village, located in the Erhai Lake Basin. In 2022, two irrigation treatments were set up: conventional flooding irrigation (CK) and controlled irrigation (C), with three replicates for each treatment. In 2023, aiming to enhance the utilization rate of rainwater resources and reduce the direct discharge of dry-farming tailwater from upstream into Erhai Lake. The paddy field was used as an ecological storage basin, and the water storage depth of the paddy field was increased compared to the depth of 2022. Combined with the deep storage of rainwater, the dry-farming tailwater was recharged into the paddy field to reduce the drainage. In 2023, two water treatments, flooding irrigation with deep storage and controlled drainage (CKCD) and water-saving irrigation with deep storage and controlled drainage (CCD) were set up, and each treatment was set up with three replicates. The growth and physiological index of rice at various stages were observed. Nitrogen leaching of paddy field in surface water, soil water, and groundwater under different water treatments after tillering fertilizer were observed. The research results show that the combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers under organic planting can provide more reasonable nutrient supply for rice, promote dry matter accumulation and other indices, and also reduce the concentration of NH4+-N in surface water. Compared with CK, the yield, 1000-grain weight, root-to-shoot ratio, and leaf area index of C are increased by 4.8%, 4.1%, 20.9%, and 9.7%, respectively. Compared with CKCD, the yield, 1000-grain weight, root-to-shoot ratio, and leaf area index of CCD are increased by 6.5%, 3.8%, 19.6%, and 21.9%, respectively. The yield in 2023 is 19% higher than that in 2022. Treatment C can increase the growth indicators and reduce the net photosynthetic rate to a certain extent, while CCD rain-flood storage can alleviate the inhibition of low irrigation lower limit on the net photosynthetic rate of rice. Both C and CCD can reduce nitrogen loss and irrigation amount in paddy fields. CCD can reduce the tailwater in the Gusheng area of the Erhai Lake Basin to Erhai Lake, and also can make full use of N, P, and other nutrients in the tailwater to promote the formation and development of rice. In conclusion, the paddy field rain-flood storage methodology in the Erhai Lake Basin can promote various growth and physiological indicators of rice, improve water resource utilization efficiency, reduce direct discharge of tailwater into Erhai Lake, and decrease the risk of agricultural non-point source pollution.

8 April 2025 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YWYing Wang
Ying Wang
QLQingsheng Liu
Qingsheng Liu
LCLihong Chen
Lihong Chen
QLQilin Lu
Qilin Lu
SLShiwei Li
Shiwei Li
SWShufang Wang
Shufang Wang
This study aimed to improve water use efficiency at side deep fertilization paddy fields and reduce the direct discharge of tailwater from upstream dry-farming into Erhai Lake. Field experiments were conducted at Erhai Lake Basin in 2023 and 2024. In this study, paddies were used as storage basins. Two water managements were set with three replicates: flooding irrigation with deep storage and controlled drainage (CKCD), and water-saving irrigation with deep storage and controlled drainage (CCD). The rice growth indicators were observed. The results show that, in 2023, compared with CKCD, the root volume, root-to-shoot ratio, stem node spacing, stem diameter, plant height, tiller number, leaf area index and yield of CCD increased by 13.6, 19.6, 12.1, 4.1, 9.4, 3.0, 21.9, and 6.5%, respectively. For CCD, the total irrigation amount decreased by 27.3%, while irrigation productivity increased by 46.7%. In 2024, there were similar trends as in 2023. However, the tiller number and leaf area index of CCD decreased by 11 and 1.5%, respectively. Additionally, in CCD, the total irrigation amount decreased 52.5%, and the irrigation productivity increased by 1.4 kg/m3. There were similar regulars in soil temperature and its relationship with other growth indicates in 2023 and 2024. Soil temperature in CCD was generally higher than in CKCD. It positively correlated with stem diameter, but negatively with root volume. Additionally, root volume positively correlated with plant height and dry matter accumulation. Overall, the CCD approach could promote the indices of rice growth, increase the paddy capacity of tailwater storage, and reduce water consumption to further achieve water savings and increased yields.