Ethan Daniel Fechter-Leggett

Dr. Ethan Daniel Fechter-Leggett

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 August 2022 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ju-Hyeong ParkJu-Hyeong Park
Ju-Hyeong Park
Eungul LeeEungul Lee
Eungul Lee
EFEthan Daniel Fechter-Leggett
Ethan Daniel Fechter-Leggett
EWEllie Williams
Ellie Williams
SYShobha Yadav
Shobha Yadav
GCGinger L. Chew
Ginger L. Chew

24 July 2015 in Journal of Community Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EFEthan Daniel Fechter-Leggett
Ethan Daniel Fechter-Leggett
AVAmbarish Vaidyanathan
Ambarish Vaidyanathan
ECEkta Choudhary
Ekta Choudhary

24 December 2024 in The Journal of the American Dental Association
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EFEthan Daniel Fechter-Leggett
Ethan Daniel Fechter-Leggett
RLRuth D. Lipman
Ruth D. Lipman
STSuzanne E. Tomasi
Suzanne E. Tomasi
RNRandall C Nett
Randall C Nett
JCJean Mary Cox-Ganser
Jean Mary Cox-Ganser

26 October 2022 in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KBKellan E Baker
Kellan E Baker
DCD’lAne Compton
D’lAne Compton
EFEthan Daniel Fechter-Leggett
Ethan Daniel Fechter-Leggett
CGChris Grasso
Chris Grasso
CKClair A Kronk
Clair A Kronk
To propose an approach for semantic and functional data harmonization related to sex and gender constructs in electronic health records (EHRs) and other clinical systems for implementors, as outlined in the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) report Measuring Sex, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation and the Health Level 7 (HL7) Gender Harmony Project (GHP) product brief “Gender Harmony—Modeling Sex and Gender Representation, Release 1.” Authors from both publications contributed to a plan for data harmonization based upon fundamental principles in informatics, including privacy, openness, access, legitimate infringement, least intrusive alternatives, and accountability. We propose construct entities and value sets that best align with both publications to allow the implementation of EHR data elements on gender identity, recorded sex or gender, and sex for clinical use in the United States. We include usability- and interoperability-focused reasoning for each of these decisions, as well as suggestions for cross-tabulation for populations. Both publications agree on core approaches to conceptualization and measurement of sex- and gender-related constructs. However, some clarifications could improve our ability to assess gender modality, alignment (or lack thereof) between gender identity and assigned gender at birth, and address both individual-level and population-level health inequities. By bridging the GHP and NASEM recommendations, we provide a path forward for implementation of sex- and gender-related EHR elements. Suggestions for implementation of gender identity, recorded sex or gender, and sex for clinical use are provided, along with semantic and functional justifications.

AFAnne Foreman
Anne Foreman
AOAmel Omari
Amel Omari
KMKristin J Marks
Kristin J Marks
ATAlyssa Troeschel
Alyssa Troeschel
EHEmily Haas
Emily Haas
GCGinger L. Chew
Ginger L. Chew
Hurricane Ida, a Category 4 hurricane, made landfall in southern Louisiana in August of 2021, causing widespread wind damage and flooding. The objective of this study was to investigate knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to post-hurricane mold exposure and cleanup among residents and workers in areas of Louisiana affected by Hurricane Ida and assess changes in knowledge, attitudes, and practices that have occurred over the past 16 years since Hurricane Katrina. We conducted in-person interviews with 238 residents and 68 mold-remediation workers in areas in and around New Orleans to ask about their mold cleanup knowledge and practices, personal protective equipment use, and risk perceptions related to mold. Knowledge of recommended safety measures increased since the post-Katrina survey but adherence to recommended safety measures did not. Many residents and some workers reported using insufficient personal protective equipment when cleaning up mold despite awareness of the potential negative health effects of mold exposure.

1 February 2022 in Health Security
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EFEthan Daniel Fechter-Leggett
Ethan Daniel Fechter-Leggett
KFKathleen B. Fedan
Kathleen B. Fedan
JCJean M. Cox-Ganser
Jean M. Cox-Ganser
MMMartin I. Meltzer
Martin I. Meltzer
BABishwa B. Adhikari
Bishwa B. Adhikari
CDChad H. Dowell
Chad H. Dowell
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, demand for N95 respirators far exceeded the supply, leading to widespread shortages. Initially, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention did not recommend N95 respirators in nonhealthcare settings, in order to reserve them for healthcare workers. As N95s became more available, the recommendations were updated in May 2021 to include N95 respirators for nonhealthcare settings. In this study, we estimated the numbers of N95s needed for nonhealthcare essential workers in the United States. This information is valuable for crisis preparedness and planning for future large-scale communicable respiratory infectious disease epidemics or pandemics. We adapted a spreadsheet-based tool originally built to estimate the potential demand for N95 respirators during an influenza pandemic. We defined nonhealthcare essential occupations according to the 2020 US Department of Homeland Security guidance and used US Bureau of Labor Statistics employment numbers and Occupational Information Network data as model parameters. We modeled minimum, intermediate, and maximum N95 provision scenarios (as 1, 2, and 5 N95 respirators, respectively) per week per worker, for pandemic durations of 15 and 40 weeks. For 85.15 million nonhealthcare essential workers during a 15-week pandemic, an estimated 1.3 billion N95 respirators would be needed under minimum provision scenarios, 2.6 billion for intermediate provision, and 6.4 billion for maximum provision. During a 40-week pandemic, these estimates increased to 3.4 billion, 6.8 billion, and 17 billion. Public health authorities and policymakers can use these estimates when considering workplace respirator-wearing practices, including prioritization of allocation, for nonhealthcare essential workers. Our novel spreadsheet-based tool can also be used to quickly generate estimates of other preparedness and response equipment.