Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 variants increase after two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine in both previously infected and naïve individuals.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common arthritis affecting synovial joints such as knees and hips of millions of people globally. Usage-related joint pain and reduced function are the most common symptoms experienced by people with OA. To improve pain management, there is a need to identify validated biomarkers predicting therapeutic responses in targeted clinical trials. Our study aimed to identify the metabolic biomarkers for pain and pressure pain detection thresholds (PPTs) in participants with knee pain and symptomatic OA using metabolic phenotyping. Metabolite and cytokine measurements were done on serum samples using LC-MS/MS (liquid gas chromatography integrated magnetic resonance mass spectrometry) and Human Proinflammatory panel 1 kit respectively. Regression analysis was done in a test (n = 75) and replication study (n = 79) to investigate the metabolites associated with current knee pain scores and pressure pain detection thresholds (PPTs). Meta-analysis and correlation were done estimating precision of associated metabolites and identifying relationship between significant metabolites and cytokines respectively. Acyl ornithine, carnosine, cortisol, cortisone, cystine, DOPA, glycolithocholic acid sulphate (GLCAS), phenylethylamine (PEA) and succinic acid were found to be significantly (FDR <.1) associated with pain scores in meta-analysis of both studies. IL-10, IL-13, IL-1β, IL2, IL8 and TNF-α were also found to be associated with the significant metabolites. Significant associations of these metabolites and inflammatory markers with knee pain suggests that targeting relevant pathways of amino acid and cholesterol metabolism may modulate cytokines and these could be targeted as novel therapeutics development to improve knee pain and OA management. PERSPECTIVE: Foreseeing the global burden of knee pain in Osteoarthritis (OA) and adverse effects of current pharmacological therapies, this study is envisaged to investigate serum metabolites and molecular pathways involved in knee pain. The replicated metabolites in this study suggests targeting amino-acid pathways for better management of OA knee pain.

Background/Objective: Although low-methoxy (LM) pectin (polysaccharides extracted from citrus peels) can reduce inflammation by binding to and inhibiting the TLR-2 pathway in animal models and in vitro studies, the anti-inflammatory effects of LM pectin in humans and mood have not been explored to date. The purpose of this study is to assess the role of dietary supplementation with LM pectin in healthy volunteers on inflammatory markers and on mood, specifically anxiety and depression. Methods: We carried out a 4-week dietary intervention with LM citrus pectin on healthy volunteers (N = 14, age 40 ± 16 y, BMI 24.7 ± 3.0 kg/m², sex F 57%) comparing the effects of daily supplementation with 20 g of LM citrus pectin versus 10 g of maltodextrin as the control (N = 15 age 43.2 ± 11 y, BMI 25.18 ± 2.0 kg/m², sex F 66%). The effects on mood and inflammation were also tested with LM pectin at 5 g, 10 g and 15 g (2 weeks each) in an independent cohort of n = 15 healthy volunteers (age 36 ± 21 y, BMI 23.5 ± 2.4 kg/m², sex F 80%). We assessed serum levels of TNF-alpha (downstream from TLR-2 activation), IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-10, INF-gamma, CRP, zonulin and TLR-2 concentration which were measured using ELISA in blood samples collected at both the baseline and follow-up visits. Validated measures of anxiety and depression were collected at baseline and follow-up. Results: Supplementation with 20 g of LM pectin resulted in decreases in the pro-inflammatory markers TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-6 and INF-gamma (all p < 0.05) and an increase in anti-inflammatory marker IL-10 (p = 0.01) at the end of the 4 weeks. No such effects were observed in the control group. In addition, a significant drop in anxiety scores (from 8.38 to 4.46, p < 0.006) was found with the 20 g/day intervention but not in the control arm. In the dose–response study, anti-inflammatory effects were seen only at 15 g for TNFα (p < 0.003) and a suggestive increase in IL-10 (p = 0.08), alongside a drop in TLR-2 (p < 0.027). No significant anti-inflammatory effects were observed at 5 g and 10 g doses of LM pectin supplementation. Significant dose-dependent drops in both anxiety and depression scores were found with 10 g (p < 0.001) and 15 g per day (p < 0.0002). Conclusions: The current study identifies anxiety-reducing and anti-inflammatory effects of supplementation with 15 g/day LM pectin in healthy humans. Further research is needed to elucidate the precise mechanism and to validate the efficient dose and minimum duration of supplementation.

Background: Emerging evidence links the gut microbiome to chronic pain processing. Inulin, a prebiotic fibre, modulates the gut microbiome, while physiotherapy-supported exercise (PSE) improves pain and function. We evaluated the effects of inulin supplementation with and without PSE on knee osteoarthritis (OA) pain. Methods: In a 2 × 2 factorial RCT, 117 community-dwelling adults with knee OA received 6 weeks of: (A) 20 g/day inulin, (B) digital PSE (Joint Academy™), (C) inulin +PSE, or (D) 10 g/day maltodextrin. Primary outcome: pain (Numerical Rating Scale). Secondary: 30 s sit-to-stand (30-CST), timed up and go (TUG), grip strength, and quantitative sensory testing. Serum short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) were measured. The study was not powered to detect synergistic interaction. Results: A total of 117 participants (58.1% female; mean ± SD age = 67.5 ± 9.4 years; BMI = 29.5 ± 5.3 kg/m²; NRS = 3.96 ± 2.67) completed the trial. Pain improved with inulin (baseline-adjusted between-group mean difference (Δ) = −1.11 [95%CI −2.18, −0.04], p = 0.045) and PSE (Δ = −1.55 [95%CI −2.52, −0.58], p = 0.002) compared to placebo, with no synergistic effect. PSE improved TUG (p = 0.02) and 30-CST (p = 0.0004), while inulin improved grip strength (p = 0.002), pressure pain thresholds (p = 0.009) and temporal summation (p = 0.025) compared to placebo and had significantly lower dropout rates (3.6%) compared with PSE (21% p < 0.01). Only inulin increased SCFA butyrate (p = 0.0248) and GLP-1 (p = 0.0109), and higher GLP-1 was associated with improved grip strength, suggesting a gut–muscle link. Conclusions: Inulin and PSE each produced meaningful pain reductions. Only inulin improved pain sensitivity and grip strength, the latter paralleled by increased GLP-1, and had much higher rates of retention compared to PSE.

Objective To assess the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in healthcare workers and subsequent transmission to their close contacts within their household. To assess changes in immunoglobulin (Ig) and neutralising antibodies (nAbs) in exposed participants. Setting Two acute National Health Service (NHS) hospitals within the East Midlands region of England. Background The UK has been one of the most severely affected countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Transmission from healthcare workers to the wider community is a potential major vector for spread of SARS-CoV-2 which is not well described in the current literature. Methods Healthcare workers (HCW) were recruited from two Hospitals within the East Midlands of England and underwent serial blood sampling for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (both nucleocapsid and spike protein for IgG, IgM and IgA) between 20 April and 30 July 2020, with the presence of neutralising antibodies (nAbs) assessed for positive participants. Cohabitees of the volunteers were invited to attend testing in July -August 2020 and underwent identical serological testing as the HCWs. Results 633 healthcare professionals were recruited. 178 household contacts of 137 professionals volunteered for the study. 18% of healthcare professionals (115 out of 633) tested as seropositive during the study period, compared to an estimated seroprevalence of 7% within the general population. The rate of symptomatic COVID-19 was 27.5% compared to an asymptomatic rate of 15.1%. Rates of positivity declined across the study period for all immunoglobulins (overall positivity from 16.7% to 6.9%). 7.2% of the cohabitees tested as seropositive. 58 cohabitees lived with a serologically positive HCW; this group had a seropositive rate of 15.5%, compared to 2.5% of cohabitees without a seropositive HCW, a six-fold increase in risk (Odds ratio 7.16 95% CI 1.86 to 27.59), p = 0.0025). Given the observed decay rates and data from Public Health England, we estimate that the proportion of seropositive cohabitees living with a seropositive HCW at the height of the first wave could have been as high as 44%. 110 out of 115 (95.7%) HCWs and 12 out of 13 (92.3%) cohabitees who tested positive developed detectable nAbs. 56.5% (65 out of 115) of SARS-CoV-2 positive HCWs developed a neutralising titre with an IC50 1/300 dilution; no cohabitee achieved this level. Conclusions Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 between healthcare professionals and their home contacts appears to be a significant factor of viral transmission, but, even accounting for the decline in seropositivity over time, less than 44% of adult cohabitees of seropositive healthcare workers became seropositive. Routine screening and priority vaccination of both healthcare professionals and their close contacts should be implemented to reduce viral transmission from hospitals to the community.