John Paoli

Prof. Dr. John Paoli

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 May 2014 in British Journal of Dermatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJosep Malvehy
Josep Malvehy
AHA. Hauschild
A. Hauschild
CCC. Curiel‐Lewandrowski
C. Curiel‐Lewandrowski
PMP. Mohr
P. Mohr
RHR. Hofmann‐Wellenhof
R. Hofmann‐Wellenhof
UBUlrik Birgersson
Ulrik Birgersson
Background Even though progress has been made, the detection of melanoma still poses a challenge. In light of this situation, the Nevisense electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) system (SciBase AB, Stockholm, Sweden) was designed and shown to have the potential to be used as an adjunct diagnostic tool for melanoma detection. Objectives To assess the effectiveness and safety of the Nevisense system in the distinction of benign lesions of the skin from melanoma with electrical impedance spectroscopy. Methods This multicentre, prospective, and blinded clinical study was conducted at five American and 17 European investigational sites. All eligible skin lesions in the study were examined with the EIS‐based Nevisense system, photographed, removed by excisional biopsy and subjected to histopathological evaluation. A postprocedure clinical follow‐up was conducted at 7 ± 3 days from the initial measurement. A total of 1951 patients with 2416 lesions were enrolled into the study; 1943 lesions were eligible and evaluable for the primary efficacy end point, including 265 melanomas – 112 in situ and 153 invasive melanomas with a median Breslow thickness of 0·57 mm [48 basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and seven squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs)]. Results The observed sensitivity of Nevisense was 96·6% (256 of 265 melanomas) with an exact one‐sided 95% lower confidence bound estimated at 94·2% and an observed specificity of 34·4%, and an exact two‐sided 95% confidence bound estimated at 32·0–36·9%. The positive and negative predictive values of Nevisense were 21·1% and 98·2%, respectively. The observed sensitivity for nonmelanoma skin cancer was 100% (55 of 48 BCCs and seven SCCs) with an exact two‐sided 95% confidence bound estimated at 93·5–100·0%. Conclusions Nevisense is an accurate and safe device to support clinicians in the detection of cutaneous melanoma.

1 May 2008 in Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJohn Paoli
John Paoli
MSMaria Smedh
Maria Smedh
AWAnn-Marie Wennberg
Ann-Marie Wennberg
MEMarica B. Ericson
Marica B. Ericson

19 July 2017 in British Journal of Dermatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Aimilios LallasAimilios Lallas
Aimilios Lallas
ZAZoe Apalla
Zoe Apalla
DID. Ioannides
D. Ioannides
ELE. Lazaridou
E. Lazaridou
AKATHANASSIOS KYRGIDIS
ATHANASSIOS KYRGIDIS
PTPhilipp Tschandl
Philipp Tschandl

1 February 2015 in Acta Dermato-Venereologica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ABA Börve
A Börve
JGJ Gyllencreutz
J Gyllencreutz
KTK Terstappen
K Terstappen
EBE Backman
E Backman
AAA Aldenbratt
A Aldenbratt
JPJohn Paoli
John Paoli
In this open, controlled, multicentre and prospective observational study, smartphone teledermoscopy referrals were sent from 20 primary hea...

1 December 2017 in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSChristoph Sinz
Christoph Sinz
PTPhilipp Tschandl
Philipp Tschandl
CRCliff Rosendahl
Cliff Rosendahl
BABengu Nisa Nisa Akay
Bengu Nisa Nisa Akay
Giuseppe ArgenzianoGiuseppe Argenziano
Giuseppe Argenziano
HKHARALD KITTLER
HARALD KITTLER

12 February 2015 in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SVSergio Vano-Galvan
Sergio Vano-Galvan
AMA.M. Molina‐Ruiz
A.M. Molina‐Ruiz
PFP. Fernández‐Crehuet
P. Fernández‐Crehuet
ARA. R. Rodrigues‐Barata
A. R. Rodrigues‐Barata
SAS. Arias‐Santiago
S. Arias‐Santiago
FCF.M. Camacho
F.M. Camacho