Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to (I) evaluate the evidence on the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in hypertensive patients; (II) determine whether HIIT impacts SBP and DBP differently; and (III) assess the clinical relevance of these effects. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple electronic databases, resulting in the inclusion of seven randomized clinical trials in the meta-analysis. The outcomes were analyzed using random-effects models to compute mean differences (MD) and standardized mean differences (SMD) for SBP and DBP. Results: A small reduction in SBP was observed with HIIT interventions (MD −3.00; 95% CI −4.61 to −1.39; p < 0.0001; SMD −0.28; 95% CI −0.42 to −0.13; p = 0.0003). However, no statistically significant reductions were detected for DBP (MD −0.70; 95% CI −1.80 to 0.39; p = 0.21; SMD −0.07; 95% CI −0.22 to 0.08; p = 0.35). Despite demonstrating statistical significance for SBP, the effects did not reach clinical relevance. Conclusions: HIIT interventions yield small reductions in SBP, with minimal impact on DBP. These findings suggest limited clinical relevance in the management of hypertension. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to standardize HIIT protocols, with specific emphasis on intensity control and manipulation, to better understand their potential role in hypertensive populations.
Fibromyalgia (FM) is characterized by persistent widespread pain that severely impacts quality of life. Immersive virtual reality-based exercise (iVRE) is emerging as a therapeutic modality for chronic pain management. However, research on iVRE in FM patients has primarily focused on perceived pain intensity (PI), with limited exploration of underlying analgesic mechanisms. This study aims to explore the effects of iVRE on PI, considering risk of poor outcomes (RPO) stratification, and on mechanical pain sensitivity (MPS) in FM. A single-arm, uncontrolled, pre-post-test exploratory study was conducted in subjects with FM. The intervention included 2 weekly 15-min iVRE sessions for 6 weeks. PI (numeric rating scale [NRS]) and MPS (pressure pain thresholds [PPTs] at the upper trapezius, lumbar spine, and knee) were assessed at baseline, after the first session (to assess exercise-induced hypoalgesia), and postintervention. RPO was assessed using the Keele STarT MSK Tool. Eleven participants completed the study. No adverse effects were reported. Clinically important reductions were observed in PI (mean difference [MD]: −2.36, 95% CI: [−4.15, −0.58], d = 0.89; p < 0.05) with this effect being associated with baseline RPO. No observable changes were found in PPTs (all 95% CIs included 0, p > 0.05). In this sample, iVRE appears to reduce PI but not PPTs, suggesting the persistence of MPS and limitations in activating endogenous pain inhibitory mechanisms. Further randomized controlled trials with larger samples are needed to corroborate these results.
INPLASY202480131 Effects of manipulation and intensity control of high-intensity interval training on blood pressure in persons with arterial hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of …
Optimal hydration is crucial for maintaining health and athletic performance in young soccer players. This requires constant monitoring by medical and sports teams during training sessions and competitions. Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine hydration status based on variations in body weight, fluid intake, and urine specific gravity during three training sessions and a FIFA competition in elite U-17 youth soccer players, national team members. Methods: Twenty-one elite soccer players, aged 17.2 ± 0.29 years, with a body weight of 72.1 ± 6.95 kg and a height of 1.80 ± 0.05 m, participated in the study. To determine hydration status, percentage weight loss, fluid intake, and urine density were measured during three training sessions and one FIFA-level competition. Results: Differences in body weight were observed in two of the training sessions, with greater variation in the competition (3.5% of BW, p < 0.001). Significant differences were found between weight losses in training sessions vs. matches. An increase in initial weight was associated with lower urine density. Regression coefficients showed that differences in body weight can predict urine density during training and competition (p < 0.05). A decrease in final body weight could be a valid indicator as a predictor of higher urinary density.
Objectives: To evaluate the validity, accuracy, and reliability of the G-Force force platform during isometric tests, through comparison with a gold-standard force platform in physically active young adults. Methods: Nine physically active participants (23.67 ± 4.97 years; body mass index: 25.79 ± 3.02 kg/m2) performed isometric posterior lower limb muscle tests per leg, following a standardized warm-up and familiarization protocol. The G-Force platform and compared against a gold-standard device, the Valkyria Trainer Balance (VTB) force platform. The measured variables included Peak Force and peak rate of force development (RFD) at 50, 100 and 150 ms (RFD50, RFD100 and RFD150). Intra- and inter-platform reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), coefficient of variation (CV%), Bland–Altman analysis and Pearson’s correlation coefficients between both platforms. Results: Peak Force showed excellent intra-platform repeatability (ICC = 0.86–0.91) and moderate-to-good inter-platform reliability (ICC = 0.75–0.77), with the G-Force platform generally reporting slightly lower absolute values than VTB. RFD measures demonstrated moderate reproducibility (ICC = 0.75–0.87) and higher variability (CV = 47–57%). Bland–Altman analyses revealed minimal bias for Peak Force, while regression analyses indicated strong, significant associations between G-Force and VTB measurements (R2 = 0.55–0.77; β = 0.74–0.88; p < 0.05). Conclusions: The G-Force force platform is a valid, reliable, and low-cost tool for assessing isometric strength in physically active young adults.
1 October 2026 in Sportis. Scientific Journal of School Sport, Physical Education and Psychomotricity
Initial Physical Education teacher education has been debated in relation to biomedical and health-oriented rationalities; however, credit distribution alone cannot capture biologisation as an epistemological, discursive, and pedagogical phenomenon. This study conducted a documentary curriculum mapping of 28 Chilean university programmes in force up to January 2026, distributed across public (n = 12), private (n = 9), and G9 universities (n = 7). Courses were classified into Biology, Basic Medicine, and Health Sciences using the OECD Fields of Research and Development taxonomy, and their relative credit weight was calculated. Group comparisons used one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis tests according to statistical assumptions. Overall, the analysed areas represented 12.25% of programme credits: Biology, 0.70%; Basic Medicine, 4.22%; and Health Sciences, 7.28%. The total proportion differed across university groups, F(2,25) = 4.56, p = 0.0205, η² = 0.267; Tukey’s HSD showed higher values in G9 than private universities (difference = 5.61 percentage points; 95% CI 0.92–10.30; p = 0.0168). Health Sciences also differed, H(2) = 6.84, p = 0.0327, ε² = 0.194, with higher mean ranks in G9 than private universities (Dunn–Holm p = 0.0270), although Welch’s ANOVA did not confirm the overall result (p = 0.0943). No differences were observed in Biology or Basic Medicine. These findings describe explicit credit allocation but do not establish cross-curricular biomedical orientation or hierarchical differences among university types.