During the COVID-19 pandemic, the majority of the firms and institutions implemented work from home to continue their operations and keep the well-being of their employees. Indeed, organizations including the universities operate successfully amid the implementation of quarantine, digitalization, and limited face-to-face communication. We studied the impacts of the acceptance of work from home and well-being on individual work performance. We found that acceptance of work from home have indications of significant influences on employees' well-being and individual work performance. For the selected university employees, work from home is moderately preferred because of the cherished activities like commuting, time with friends, and the occurrence of more physical activities. The incidence of illnesses, sleep disturbance, anxiety, dissatisfaction, and loneliness were indicators of well-being concerns that influence individual work performance. Appreciation by others and the increased spirituality motivate the employees during the work from the home set-up. COVID-19 pandemic brings various issues in communication, resources, emotions, environment, financial difficulties, work-life imbalance, time management, stress, less work, and lack of access to office materials, to the employees. However, there are opportunities for better learning, better well-being, and more often family routines. Focus on work, work-life balance fit, positive attitude, less stress, and savings are benefits of working from home. University leadership, supervisors, and managers have an overview of the issues to be provided with solutions. The qualitative responses are potential research instruments to be tested for reliability. An adequate number of employees in different positions and universities to create a quantitative model is encouraged for future researchers.ReferencesAnderson, D. R., Sweeney, D. J., Williams, T. A., Camm, J. D., & Cochran, J. J. (2018). Modern Business Statistics with Microsoft Office Excel (6th ed.). SouthWestern/Thomson Learning.Arruda, W. (2020). Ways COVID-19 will change the workplace forever. Working from home effectiveness during Covid-19: Evidence from university staff in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 27 (1), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.05.002Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2018). Multiple levels in job demandsresources theory: Implications for employee well-being and performance. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of Well-being. DEF Publishers. https://doi.org/nobascholar.comBrown, C., Spiro, J., & Quinton, S. (2020). The role of research ethics committees: Friend or foe in educational research? An exploratory study. British Educational Research Journal, 46 (4), 747-769. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3654Cankir, B. & Sahin, S. (2018). Psychological well-being and jobperformance: The mediating role of engagement. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi – Yıl, 11 Sayı 3, 2550-2560. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330022893_Psychological_Well-Being_and_Job_Performance_The_Mediating_Role_of_Work_EngagementCharoensukmongkol, P. & Phungsoonthorn, T. (2020). The interaction effect of crisis communication and social support on the emotional exhaustion of university employees during the COVID-19 crisis. International Journal of Business Communication, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488420953188Creswell, J.W. (2013). Steps in conducting a scholarly mixed methods study. DBER Speaker Series, 48, 1-54. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dberspeakers/48Drasler, V., Bertoncelj, J., Korosec, M., Zontar, T. P., Ulrih, N. P. & Cigic, B. (2021). Difference in the attitude of students and employees of the University of Ljubljana towards work from home and online education: Lessons from COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13 (5118), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095118Evanoff, B. A., Strickland, J. R., Dale A. M., Hayibor, L., Page, E., Duncan, J. G., Kannampallil, T. & Gray, D. L. (2020). Workrelated and personal factors associated with mental well-being during the COVID-19 response: Survey of Health Care and Other Workers, 22 (8), 2-11. https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e29069Fakis, A., Hilliam, R., Stonely, H. & Towned, M. (2014). Quantitative analysis of qualitative information from interviews: A systematic literature review. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8 (2), 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813495111Funder, D. C. & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202Gandy, W. M., Coberley, C., Pope, J. E., Wells, A. & Rula, E. Y. (2014). Comparing the contributions of well-being and disease status to employee productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000109Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M. & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and How to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31 (1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203Hashim R., Bakar, A., Noh, I. & Mahyudin, H. A. (2020). Employees’ job satisfaction and performance through working from home during the pandemic lockdown. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 5(15), 461-467. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v5i15.2515Ipsen, C., van Veldhoven, M., Kirchner, K., Hansen, J.P. (2021).Six key advantages and disadvantages of working from home in Europe during COVID-19. Int. J. Environ. Res. and Public Health, 18 (1826). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041826Irawanto, D. W., Novianti, K. R. & Roz, K. (2021). Work from home: Measuring satisfaction between work-life balance and work stress during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Economies, 9, 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9030096Giovanis E. & Ozdamar O. (2021) Implications of COVID-19: the effect of working from home on...