The XVI-th Banff Meeting for Allograft Pathology was held in Banff, Alberta, Canada, from 19th-23rd September 2022, as a joint meeting with the Canadian Society of Transplantation. To mark the 30^th anniversary of the first Banff Classification, pre-meeting discussions were held on the past, present, and future of the Banff Classification. This report is a summary of the meeting highlights that were most important in terms of their effect on the Classification, including discussions around microvascular inflammation and biopsy-based transcript analysis for diagnosis. In a post-meeting survey, agreement was reached on the delineation of the following phenotypes: (1) "Probable antibody-mediated rejection (AMR)", which represents DSA-positive cases with some histological features of AMR but below current thresholds for a definitive AMR diagnosis; and (2) "Microvascular inflammation (MVI), DSA-negative and C4d-negative", a phenotype of unclear cause requiring further study, which represents cases with MVI not explained by DSA. Although biopsy-based transcript diagnostics are considered promising and remain an integral part of the Banff Classification (limited to diagnosis of AMR), further work needs to be done to agree on the exact classifiers, thresholds, and clinical context of use.

The non‐pathogenic and ubiquitous Torque Teno virus (TTV) is associated with immunosuppression in solid organ transplant recipients. Studies in kidney transplant patients proposed TTV quantification for risk stratification of graft rejection and infection. In this prospective trial (DRKS00012335) 386 consecutive kidney transplant recipients were subjected to longitudinal per‐protocol monitoring of plasma TTV load by PCR for 12 months post‐transplantation. TTV load peaked at the end of month 3 post‐transplantation and reached steady state thereafter. TTV load after the end of month 3 was analyzed in the context of subsequent rejection diagnosed by indication biopsy and infection within the first year post‐transplantation, respectively. Each log increase in TTV load decreased the odds for rejection by 22% (OR 0.78, 95%CI 0.62‐0.97; P=.027) and increased the odds for infection by 11% (OR 1.11, 95%CI 1.06‐1.15; P<.001). TTV was quantified at a median of 14 days before rejection was diagnosed and 27 days before onset of infection, respectively. We defined a TTV load between 1x10⁶ and 1x10⁸ copies/mL as optimal range to minimize the risk for rejection and infection. These data support the initiation of an interventional trial assessing the efficacy of TTV‐guided immunosuppression to reduce infection and graft rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

The XVIth Banff Meeting for Allograft Pathology was held in Banff, Alberta, Canada, from September 19 to 23, 2022, as a joint meeting with the Canadian Society of Transplantation. In addition to a key focus on the impact of microvascular inflammation and biopsy-based transcript analysis on the Banff Classification, further sessions were devoted to other aspects of kidney transplant pathology, in particular T cell-mediated rejection, activity and chronicity indices, digital pathology, xenotransplantation, clinical trials, and surrogate endpoints. Although the output of these sessions has not led to any changes in the classification, the key role of Banff Working Groups in phrasing unanswered questions, and coordinating and disseminating results of investigations addressing these unanswered questions was emphasized. This paper summarizes the key Banff Meeting 2022 sessions not covered in the Banff Kidney Meeting 2022 Report paper and also provides an update on other Banff Working Group activities relevant to kidney allografts.

Despite major advances in transplant medicine, improvements in long-term kidney allograft survival have not been commensurate with those observed shortly after transplantation. The formation of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and ongoing antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) processes may critically contribute to late graft loss. However, appropriate treatment for late AMR has not yet been defined. There is accumulating evidence that the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib may substantially affect the function and integrity of alloantibody-secreting plasma cells. The impact of this agent on the course of late AMR has not so far been systematically investigated. The BORTEJECT Study is a randomized controlled trial designed to clarify the impact of intravenous bortezomib on the course of late AMR. In this single-center study (nephrological outpatient service, Medical University Vienna) we plan an initial cross-sectional DSA screening of 1,000 kidney transplant recipients (functioning graft at ≥180 days; estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >20 ml/minute/1.73 m²). DSA-positive recipients will be subjected to kidney allograft biopsy to detect morphological features consistent with AMR. Forty-four patients with biopsy-proven AMR will then be included in a double-blind placebo-controlled intervention trial (1:1 randomization stratified for eGFR and the presence of T-cell-mediated rejection). Patients in the active group will receive two cycles of bortezomib (4 × 1.3 mg/m² over 2 weeks; 3-month interval between cycles). The primary end point will be the course of eGFR over 24 months (intention-to-treat analysis). The sample size was calculated according to the assumption of a 5 ml/minute/1.73 m² difference in eGFR slope (per year) between the two groups (alpha: 0.05; power: 0.8). Secondary endpoints will be DSA levels, protein excretion, measured glomerular filtration rate, transplant and patient survival, and the development of acute and chronic morphological lesions in 24-month protocol biopsies. The impact of anti-humoral treatment on the course of late AMR has not yet been systematically investigated. Based on the hypothesis that proteasome inhibition improves the outcome of DSA-positive late AMR, we suggest that our trial has the potential to provide solid evidence towards the treatment of this type of rejection. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01873157 .

The Banff antibody mediated rejection (ABMR) classification is vulnerable to misinterpretation, but the reasons are unclear. To better understand this vulnerability, we evaluated how ABMR is diagnosed in practice. To do this, the Banff Antibody‐Mediated Injury Workgroup electronically surveyed an international cohort of nephrologists/surgeons (n=133) and renal pathologists (n=99). Most providers (97%) responded that they use the Banff ABMR classification at least sometimes, but DSA information is often not readily available. Only 41.1%(55/133) of nephrologists/surgeons and 19.2%(19/99) of pathologists reported that they always have DSA results when the biopsy is available. Additionally, only 19.6%(26/133) of nephrologists/surgeons responded that non‐HLA antibody or molecular transcripts are obtained when ABMR histologic features are present but DSA is undetected. Several respondents agreed that histologic features concerning for ABMR in the absence of DSA and/or C4d are not well accounted for in the current classification [31.3% (31/99) pathologists and 37.6%(50/133) nephrologist/surgeons]. The Banff ABMR classification appears widely accepted, but efforts to improve the accessibility of DSA information for the multidisciplinary care team are needed. Further clarity is also needed in Banff ABMR nomenclature to account for the spectrum of ABMR and for histologic features suspicious for ABMR when DSA is absent.

The XVIIth Banff meeting for transplant pathology was held in Paris, France, from September 16, 2024 to September 20, 2024, hosted by the Paris Institute for Transplantation & Organ Regeneration. The Banff 2024 meeting resulted in no changes to the Banff kidney classification. Important outputs of the meeting were a reaffirmation of the clinical usefulness of the clinical reasoning framework and flowchart for cases with microvascular inflammation/antibody-mediated rejection introduced at the Banff 2022 meeting and the introduction of a similar flowchart for tubulointerstitial inflammation and intimal arteritis (v lesion). The meeting highlighted the complexity of the immunologic processes (alloimmune and others) that lead to allograft inflammation and the need to strengthen the Banff system for differential diagnostic reasoning. Guidance is put in place for cases with incomplete/mixed phenotypes, which acknowledges the limits of our understanding. A proposal for potential future implementation of activity and chronicity indices was discussed, as well as digital and biopsy-based molecular tools that have the potential to help transform the classification into a probabilistic tool reflective of the underlying immunologic processes. Finally, guidelines for reporting of glomerular disease in the posttransplant setting were developed.