Haze aerosols have a profound impact on air quality and pose serious health risks to the public. Due to its geographical location, Beijing experienced haze events in the spring of 2024. Lidar is an active remote sensing technology with a high spatiotemporal resolution and the ability to classify aerosols, and it is essential for effective haze monitoring. This study utilizes fluorescence–Raman–Mie polarization lidar with an emission wavelength of 355 nm, employing the - method based on the particle depolarization ratio at 355 nm () and the fluorescence capacity (), and combines meteorological data and backward-trajectory analysis to observe and classify low-altitude haze aerosols in Beijing during the spring of 2024. Notably, a mining dust event with strong fluorescence backscatter was detected. The haze aerosols were categorized into three types: pollution aerosols, desert dust, and mining dust. Their optical properties were summarized and compared. Desert dust showed a particle depolarization ratio range of 0.23–0.39 and a fluorescence capacity range from 0.18 × 10−4 to 0.63 × 10−4. Pollution aerosols had a larger fluorescence capacity but a lower depolarization ratio compared to desert dust, with a fluorescence capacity ranging from 0.55 × 10−4 to 1.10 × 10−4 and a depolarization ratio ranging from 0.10 to 0.17. Mining dust shared similar depolarization characteristics with desert dust but had a larger fluorescence capacity, ranging from 0.71 × 10−4 to 1.23 × 10−4, with a depolarization ratio range of 0.30–0.39. This study validates the effectiveness of the - method in classifying low-altitude haze aerosols in Beijing. Additionally, it offers a new perspective for more detailed dust classification using lidar. Furthermore, utilizing the - classification method and the - distributions of three typical aerosol samples, we developed a set of equations for the analysis of mixed aerosols. This method facilitates the separation and fraction analysis of aerosol components under various mixing scenarios. It enables the characterization of variations in the three types of haze aerosols at different altitudes and times, offering valuable insights into the interactions between desert dust, mining dust, and pollution aerosols in Beijing.
The remote sensing of water clouds is useful for studying their spatial and temporal variations and constraining physical processes in climate and weather prediction models. However, radar-only detection provides inadequate information for the cloud droplet size distribution. Here, we propose a novel lookup-table method, which combines lidar (1064, 532 nm) and radar (8.6 mm) to retrieve profiles of cloud optical (backscatter coefficient and extinction coefficient) and microphysical properties (effective diameter and liquid water content). Through the iteration of the extinction-to-backscatter ratio, more continuous cloud optical characteristics can be obtained. Sensitivity analysis shows that a 10% error of the lidar constant will lead to a retrieval error of up to 30%. The algorithm performed precise capture of the ideal cloud signal at a specific height and at full height and the maximum relative error of the backscatter coefficients at 1064 nm and 532 nm were 6% and 4%, respectively. With the application of the algorithm in the two observation cases on single or multiple cloud layers, the results indicate that the microphysical properties mostly agree with the empirical radar measurements but are slightly different when larger particles cause signal changes of different extents. Consequently, the synergetic algorithm is capable of computing the cloud droplet size distribution. It provides continuous profiles of cloud optical properties and captures cloud microphysical properties well for water cloud studies.
The pure rotational Raman (PRR) lidar technique relies on calibration functions (CFs) to extract temperature information from raw detection data. The choice of CF significantly impacts the accuracy of the retrieved temperature. In this study, we propose a method that combines multiple Monte Carlo simulation experiments with a statistical analysis, and we first conduct simulated comparisons of the calibration effects of different CFs while considering the impact of noise. We categorized ten common CFs into four groups based on their functional form and the number of calibration coefficients. Based on functional form, specifically, we defined 1/T = f(lnQ) as a forward calibration function (FCF) and lnQ = g(1/T) as a backward calibration function (BCF). Here, T denotes temperature, and Q denotes the signal intensity ratio. Their performance within and outside the calibration interval is compared across different integration times, smoothing methods, and reference temperature ranges. The results indicate that CFs of the same category exhibit similar calibration effects, while those of different categories exhibit notable differences. Within the calibration interval, the FCF performs better, especially with more coefficients. However, outside the calibration interval, the linear calibration function (which can be considered a two-coefficient FCF) has an obvious advantage. Conclusions based on the simulation results are validated with actual data, and the factors influencing calibration errors are discussed. Utilizing these findings to guide CF selection can enhance the accuracy and stability of PRR lidar detection.
Auto-adaptive background subtraction (AABS) is proposed as a denoising method for data processing of the coherent Doppler lidar (CDL). The method is proposed specifically for a low-signal-to-noise-ratio regime, in which the drifting power spectral density of CDL data occurs. Unlike the periodogram maximum (PM) and adaptive iteratively reweighted penalized least squares (airPLS), the proposed method presents reliable peaks and is thus advantageous in identifying peak locations. According to the analysis results of simulated and actually measured data, the proposed method outperforms the airPLS method and the PM algorithm in the furthest detectable range. The proposed method improves the detection range approximately up to 16.7% and 40% when compared to the airPLS method and the PM method, respectively. It also has smaller mean wind velocity and standard error values than the airPLS and PM methods. The AABS approach improves the quality of Doppler shift estimates and can be applied to obtain the whole wind profiling by the CDL.