Jane Jepsen

Dr. Jane Jepsen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2006 in Ecological Modelling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VGVolker Grimm
Volker Grimm
UBUta Berger
Uta Berger
FBFinn Bastiansen
Finn Bastiansen
SESigrunn Eliassen
Sigrunn Eliassen
VGVincent Ginot
Vincent Ginot
DDDonald L. DeAngelis
Donald L. DeAngelis

3 February 2020 in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PLPhilipp Lehmann
Philipp Lehmann
TATea Ammunét
Tea Ammunét
MBMadeleine Barton
Madeleine Barton
ABAndrea Battisti
Andrea Battisti
SESanford D Eigenbrode
Sanford D Eigenbrode
CBChrister Björkman
Christer Björkman
Although it is well known that insects are sensitive to temperature, how they will be affected by ongoing global warming remains uncertain because these responses are multifaceted and ecologically complex. We reviewed the effects of climate warming on 31 globally important phytophagous (plant‐eating) insect pests to determine whether general trends in their responses to warming were detectable. We included four response categories (range expansion, life history, population dynamics, and trophic interactions) in this assessment. For the majority of these species, we identified at least one response to warming that affects the severity of the threat they pose as pests. Among these insect species, 41% showed responses expected to lead to increased pest damage, whereas only 4% exhibited responses consistent with reduced effects; notably, most of these species (55%) demonstrated mixed responses. This means that the severity of a given insect pest may both increase and decrease with ongoing climate warming. Overall, our analysis indicated that anticipating the effects of climate warming on phytophagous insect pests is far from straightforward. Rather, efforts to mitigate the undesirable effects of warming on insect pests must include a better understanding of how individual species will respond, and the complex ecological mechanisms underlying their responses.


1 September 2003 in Ecological Modelling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CCChristopher John Christopher
Christopher John Christopher
THTine S. Hansen
Tine S. Hansen
TJThomas S. Jensen
Thomas S. Jensen
JJJane Jepsen
Jane Jepsen
FNFrank Nikolajsen
Frank Nikolajsen
POPeter Odderskær
Peter Odderskær

29 March 2020 in Ecography
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RSRupert Seidl
Rupert Seidl
JHJuha Honkaniemi
Juha Honkaniemi
TATuomas Aakala
Tuomas Aakala
AAAleinikov Alexei
Aleinikov Alexei
PAPer Angelstam
Per Angelstam
CSCornelius Senf
Cornelius Senf
Disturbance regimes are changing in forests across the world in response to global climate change. Despite the profound impacts of disturbances on ecosystem services and biodiversity, assessments of disturbances at the global scale remain scarce. Here, we analyzed natural disturbances in boreal and temperate forest ecosystems for the period 2001–2014, aiming to 1) quantify their within‐ and between‐biome variation and 2) compare the climate sensitivity of disturbances across biomes. We studied 103 unmanaged forest landscapes with a total land area of 28.2 × 10 6 ha, distributed across five continents. A consistent and comprehensive quantification of disturbances was derived by combining satellite‐based disturbance maps with local expert knowledge of disturbance agents. We used Gaussian finite mixture models to identify clusters of landscapes with similar disturbance activity as indicated by the percent forest area disturbed as well as the size, edge density and perimeter–area‐ratio of disturbed patches. The climate sensitivity of disturbances was analyzed using Bayesian generalized linear mixed effect models and a globally consistent climate dataset. Within‐biome variation in natural disturbances was high in both boreal and temperate biomes, and disturbance patterns did not vary systematically with latitude or biome. The emergent clusters of disturbance activity in the boreal zone were similar to those in the temperate zone, but boreal landscapes were more likely to experience high disturbance activity than their temperate counterparts. Across both biomes high disturbance activity was particularly associated with wildfire, and was consistently linked to years with warmer and drier than average conditions. Natural disturbances are a key driver of variability in boreal and temperate forest ecosystems, with high similarity in the disturbance patterns between both biomes. The universally high climate sensitivity of disturbances across boreal and temperate ecosystems indicates that future climate change could substantially increase disturbance activity.

15 November 2010 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JJJane Jepsen
Jane Jepsen
LKLauri Kapari
Lauri Kapari
SHSnorre B. Hagen
Snorre B. Hagen
TSTino Schott
Tino Schott
OVOle Petter L. Vindstad
Ole Petter L. Vindstad
RIRolf A. Ims
Rolf A. Ims