Objective: This study investigated the influence of the vacuum phenomenon (VP) on surgical outcomes in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, comparing minimally invasive oblique lateral interbody fusion (MIS OLIF) and endoscopic decompression. Methods: A cohort of 110 patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis underwent either endoscopic decompression or MIS OLIF. Patients were classified into two groups based on the presence or absence of the VP on preoperative CT scans, non-VP (n = 42) and VP (n = 68). Radiologic and clinical outcomes, including back and leg pain assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the EuroQol-5 Dimension (Eq5D), were compared pre- and postoperatively over a 2-year follow-up period. Results: Preoperatively, the VP group exhibited significantly greater leg pain (p = 0.010), while no significant differences were observed in back pain or the ODI between the groups. In the non-VP group, decompression and fusion yielded similar outcomes, with decompression showing a better ODI score at 1 month (p = 0.018). In contrast, in the VP group, patients who underwent fusion showed significantly improved long-term leg pain outcomes compared to those who underwent decompression at both 1-year (p = 0.042) and 2-year (p = 0.017) follow-ups. Conclusions: The VP may indicate segmental instability and may play a role in the persistence of radiculopathy. Fusion surgery appears to offer better long-term relief in patients with the VP, whereas decompression alone is a viable option in non-VP cases. These findings suggest that the VP may be a useful factor in guiding surgical decision-making.

Background: Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) is a minimally invasive technique used to manage degenerative lumbar conditions. The presence of vacuum phenomenon (VP) and associated endplate sclerosis may increase the risk of cage subsidence. This study evaluated the relationship between VP grade, endplate sclerosis, and subsidence in OLIF. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 165 patients who underwent a single-level OLIF for lumbar stenosis. Patients were stratified into VP grades (0–3) based on preoperative computed tomography scans. Disc height, endplate sclerosis, and cage subsidence were radiologically assessed. Clinical outcomes, including back and leg pain visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and EuroQol-5 Dimension, were measured preoperatively and at follow-up. Results: High VP grades were associated with low preoperative disc height and increased endplate sclerosis. Although no significant differences in clinical outcomes or final fusion rates across VP grades were observed, the subsidence rate increased with VP grade, with a significant difference between VP grades 1 and 2 (p = 0.045) and between VP grades 2 and 3 (p = 0.032), indicating that subsidence rates increased as the VP grade advanced. Conclusions: High VP grades, particularly grades 2 and 3, may increase the risk of cage subsidence following OLIF. Therefore, VP grading may be worth considering during surgical planning to reduce the subsidence risk and improve outcomes.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of iliac crest height on clinical and radiological outcomes following oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) at the L4–5 level. Methods: Data of patients who underwent single-level OLIF at the L4–5 level for degenerative spinal stenosis were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were categorized into three groups based on their iliac crest height measured relative to the L4 and L5 pedicles. Categorical and quantitative analyses, including univariate and multivariate logistic regressions, were performed to identify subsidence predictors. Clinical outcomes, including visual analog scale scores for back and leg pain, were assessed over a minimum 2-year follow-up. Results: No significant differences in cage obliquity were observed across the iliac crest height groups (axial angles, p = 0.39; coronal angles, p = 0.79). However, subsidence was significantly more common in patients with higher iliac crest heights, particularly at crest level III, where the subsidence rate reached 43% (p = 0.01). Subsidence was predominantly associated with damage to the L5 endplate, which occurred in 83% of subsidence cases at crest level III. A cutoff value of 12 mm for iliac crest height, above which the risk of subsidence significantly increased, was identified (AUC = 0.688, p = 0.042). Conclusions: Iliac crest height is a critical factor for predicting subsidence following OLIF at the L4–5 level. Surgeons should consider alternative strategies and meticulous preoperative planning in patients with an iliac crest height ≥ 12 mm to reduce the risk of adverse outcomes. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and to explore their long-term implications.