The objective of the study is to examine the effects of investor sentiment on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) index returns in bull and bear market conditions. Accordingly, this study uses monthly data to construct a new market-wide investor sentiment index and test its effects on the JSE aggregated and disaggregated index returns in alternating market conditions for the period March 2007 to January 2024. The findings of the Markov regime-switching model reveal that when the JSE is in a bull market condition, the JSE oil and gas sector returns and the JSE telecommunication sector returns are affected positively by investor sentiment. Similarly, in a bearish state, the JSE health sector returns and JSE telecommunication sector returns are negatively affected by investor sentiment. Collectively, the findings suggest that the effects of investor sentiment on JSE index returns are regime-specific and time-varying, such that they are dependent on the market conditions (bull or bear) and the type of JSE index (aggregated or disaggregated index). Accordingly, investors must consider this information to ensure resilient investment decisions and risk management strategies in sentiment-induced markets and alternating market conditions.

The excess levels of investor participation coupled with irrational behaviour in the South African bond market causes excess volatility, which in turn exposes investors to losses. Consequently, the study aims to examine the effect of market-wide investor sentiment on government bond index returns of varying maturities under changing market conditions. This study constructs a new market-wide investor sentiment index for South Africa and uses the two-state Markov regime-switching model for the sample period 2007/03 to 2024/01. The findings illustrate that the effect investor sentiment has on government bond indices returns of varying maturities is regime-specific and time-varying. For instance, the 1–3-year government index return and the over-12-year government bond index were negatively affected by investor sentiment in a bull market condition and not in a bear market condition. Moreover, the bullish market condition prevailed among the returns of selected government bond indices of varying maturities. The findings suggest that the government bond market is adaptive, as proposed by AMH, and contains alternating efficiencies. The study contributes to the emerging market literature, which is limited. That being said, it uses market-wide investor sentiment as a tool to make pronunciations on asset selection, portfolio formulation, and portfolio diversification, which assists in limiting investor losses. Moreover, the findings of the study contribute to settling the debate surrounding the efficiency of bond markets and the effect between market-wide sentiment and bond index returns in South Africa. That being said, it is nonlinear, which is a better modelled using nonlinear models and alternates with market conditions, making the government bond market adaptive.

The co-movement of multi-asset markets in emerging markets has become an important determinant for investors seeking diversified portfolios and enhanced portfolio returns. Despite this, studies have failed to examine the determinants of the co-movement of multi-asset markets such as investor sentiment and changing market conditions. Accordingly, this study investigates the effect of investor sentiment on the co-movement of South African multi-asset markets by introducing alternating market conditions. The Markov regime-switching autoregressive (MS-AR) model and Markov regime-switching vector autoregressive (MS-VAR) model impulse response function are used from 2007 March to January 2024. The findings indicate that investor sentiment has a time-varying and regime-specific effect on the co-movement of South African multi-asset markets. In a bull market condition, investor sentiment positively affects the equity–bond and equity–gold co-movement. In the bear market condition, investor sentiment has a negative and significant effect on the equity–bond, equity–property, bond–gold, and bond–property co-movement. Similarly, in a bull regime, the co-movement of South African multi-asset markets positively responds to sentiment shocks, although this is only observed in the short term. However, in the bear market regime, the co-movement of South African multi-asset markets responds positively and negatively to sentiment shocks, despite this being observed in the long run. These observations provide interesting insights to policymakers, investors, and fund managers for portfolio diversification and risk management strategies. That being, the current policies are not robust enough to reduce asset market integration and reduce sentiment-induced markets. Consequently, policymakers must re-examine and amend current policies according to the findings of the study. In addition, portfolio rebalancing in line with the findings of this study is essential for portfolio diversification.

The growing prominence of generating a well-diversified portfolio by holding securities from multi-asset markets has, over the years, drawn criticism. Various financial market events have caused asset markets to co-move, especially in emerging markets, which reduces portfolio diversification and enhances return losses. Consequently, this study examines the time–frequency co-movement of multi-asset classes in South Africa by using the Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic–Asymmetrical Dynamic Conditional Correlation (MGARCH-DCC) model, Maximal Overlap Discrete Wavelet Transformation (MODWT), and the Continuous Wavelet Transform (WTC) for the period 2007 to 2024. The findings demonstrate that the equity–bond, equity–property, equity–gold, bond–property, bond–gold, and property–gold markets depict asymmetrical time-varying correlations. Moreover, correlation in these asset pairs varies at investment periods (short-term, medium-term, and long-term), with historical events such as the 2007/2008 Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and the COVID-19 pandemic causing these asset pairs to co-move at different investment periods, which reduces diversification properties. The findings suggest that South African multi-asset markets co-move, affecting the diversification properties of holding multi-asset classes in a portfolio at different investment periods. Consequently, investors should consider the holding periods of each asset market pair in a portfolio as they dictate the level of portfolio diversification. Investors should also remember that there are lead–lag relationships and risk transmission between asset market pairs, enhancing portfolio volatility. This study assists investors in making more informed investment decisions and identifying optimal entry or exit points within South African multi-asset markets.

The exponential growth in popularity of ETFs over the last three decades has solidified ETFs as an essential component of many investors’ portfolios. Investor sentiment is one of the factors that influence market returns of ETFs during times of market volatility. This article highlights the gap in the literature by examining the role sentiment plays in ETF volatility and providing a more comprehensive understanding of how sentiment interacts with market conditions to affect ETF pricing in the South African context. This article aims to determine the effect of investor sentiment on JSE-listed ETF returns under changing market conditions. The study followed a quantitative methodology using monthly closing prices of seven JSE ETFs and an investor sentiment index. A sample period from October 2008 to December 2023 was used. For a more complex understanding of how sentiment evolved and influenced market regimes, the Markov regime-switching model was integrated with Principal Component Analysis. The results found that investor sentiment had a significant impact on most of the ETFs in both the bull and bear regimes. The bull market was more dominant than the bear market across the ETF returns. Therefore, investor sentiment affected the returns of JSE ETFs. Identifying the effect of investor sentiment on ETFs results in ETF portfolios being less affected by changing market conditions by using risk management techniques and diversifying across asset classes and investing methods.

The stability and profitability of commercial banks are closely tied to macroeconomic conditions, yet the precise nature of this relationship remains debated, especially in emerging markets like South Africa. Consequently, the objective of this study is to examine the effect of macroeconomic factors on South African commercial bank returns under changing market conditions. Using a two-state Markov regime-switching model, the study analyses data from six major South African banks over the period 2002 to 2023, including crucial financial periods like the global financial crisis (GFC) and the COVID-19 pandemic. The study finds that ABSA, Capitec, Nedbank, First Rand Bank, Standard Bank and Investec bank returns are influenced both positively and negatively by macroeconomic variables. Furthermore, such an effect alternates with bull and bear conditions which makes the effect nonlinear, time-varying and regime specific. This research contributes to the literature by applying regime-switching methodologies to an emerging market, revealing the non-linear and time-varying effects of macroeconomic conditions on bank returns. The study offers vital insights for policymakers and investors, emphasizing the need for adaptive financial strategies in managing bank performance under fluctuating economic conditions. By highlighting the differential effects of macroeconomic factors in various market regimes, this research provides a framework for more resilient financial decision-making in the South African banking sector.