Zheya Lin

Zheya Lin


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 September 2024 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sima AbdoliSima Abdoli
Sima Abdoli
Behnam Asgari LajayerBehnam Asgari Lajayer
Behnam Asgari Lajayer
ZDZahra Dehghanian
Zahra Dehghanian
NBNazila Bagheri
Nazila Bagheri
AVAmir Hossein Vafaei
Amir Hossein Vafaei
GPGordon Price
Gordon Price
Phosphorus (P) discharge from anthropogenic sources, notably sewage effluent and agricultural runoff, significantly contributes to eutrophication in aquatic environments. Stringent regulations have heightened the need for effective P removal technologies in wastewater treatment processes. This paper provides a comprehensive review of current P removal methods, focusing on both biological and chemical approaches. Biological treatments discussed include enhanced biological P removal in activated sludge systems, biological trickling filters, biofilm reactors, and constructed wetlands. The efficiency of microbial absorption and novel biotechnological integrations, such as the use of microalgae and fungi, are also examined. Chemical treatments reviewed encompass the application of metal salts, advanced oxidation processes such as chlorination, ozonation, and the Fenton reaction, as well as emerging techniques including the Electro-Fenton process and photocatalysis. Analytical methods for P, including spectrophotometric techniques and fractionation analyses, are evaluated to understand the dynamics of P in wastewater. This review critically assesses the strengths and limitations of each method, aiming to identify the most effective and sustainable solutions for P management in wastewater treatment. The integration of innovative strategies and advanced technologies is emphasized as crucial for optimizing P removal and ensuring compliance with environmental regulations.

30 May 2024 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ZLZheya Lin
Zheya Lin
GPGordon Price
Gordon Price
CLChang Liang
Chang Liang
DBDavid L. Burton
David L. Burton
DLDerek H. Lynch
Derek H. Lynch
This study investigated the influence of biosolid applications on soil carbon storage and evaluated nutrient management strategies affecting soil carbon dynamics. The research assessed alterations in soil pH, soil carbon stock, and soil nitrogen content within short-term and long-term biosolids-amended soils in Bible Hill, Nova Scotia, Canada, extending to a depth of 0-60 cm. The findings indicated an increase in soil pH with alkaline treatment biosolids (ATB) applications across both study sites, with a legacy effect on soil pH noted in the long-term biosolids-amended soil following a single ATB application over 13 years. Both sites demonstrated significant increases in soil total carbon (STC) and soil organic carbon (SOC) within the 0-30 cm soil depth after biosolid application, and soil inorganic carbon (SIC) accounted for approximately 5-10% of STC, specifically in the surface soil layer (0-15 cm). In the long-term study site, annual 14, 28 and 42 Mg ATB ha-1 treatments resulted in a substantial rise in soil carbon stock (59.5, 60.1 and 68.0 Mg C ha-1), marking a 25% increase compared to control soil. The SOC content in biosolids-amended soil showed a declining trend with increasing soil depth at both study sites. Notably, the carbon stock in the short-term site was observed in composted biosolids (COMP) > ATB > liquid mesophilic anaerobically digested biosolids (LMAD) from the 0-60 cm soil depth. Approximately 79-80% of the variation in SOC response at both sites was concentrated within the top 30 cm soil. Soil total nitrogen (STN) showed no significant differences at the short-term site, and STN in biosolids-amended soil decreased with increasing soil depth at the long-term site. Biosolids-induced C retention coefficients (BCR) for ATB remained consistent at both sites, ranging from -13% to 31.4% with a mean of 11.12%. BCR values for COMP ranged from 1.9% to 34.4% with a mean of 18.73%, while those for LMAD exhibited variability, spanning from -6.2% to 106.3% with a mean of 53.9%.